is it me or are the class 142's now the most reliable?
No! All forms of railbus are consistently at the bottom of the fleet performance tables that Modern Railways publishes every year.
Miles per casualty are, I recall, well below 10,000, though there are variations between 142s, 143s and 144s and within the classes, depending on what duties they are on and, it would appear, the maintenance they get from operator to operator. The same variations in reliability also appear from operator to operator with other types of train, eg Silverlink/London Midland 321s get more miles per casualty than NX East Anglia's.
In terms of railbuses, the Devon Metro fleet ought to be good performers.They aren't thrashed up and down steep hills all day - apart from Exeter St David's to Central - unlike many of their Welsh and North of England cousins and I'm guessing most, if not all, the
FGW▸ sets return home to Exeter depot every night, so the fitters can keep a close eye on them. Some
ATW▸ sets overnight at the end of the Valley lines and Northern's sets are outbased all over the place, so visits to main depots are less frequent.