Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 13:55 01 May 2025
 
- Snake halts Japanese bullet trains after wrapping around power line
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 05/05/25 - Walk to Pilning
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM

On this day
1st May (1971)
Amtrak founded (*)

Train RunningCancelled
12:24 Reading to Gatwick Airport
13:05 London Paddington to Newbury
13:23 London Paddington to Oxford
13:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
13:46 Bristol Temple Meads to Warminster
13:55 London Paddington to Heathrow Terminal 5
13:57 Heathrow Terminal 5 to London Paddington
13:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
14:02 Oxford to London Paddington
14:12 Newbury to Reading
14:23 London Paddington to Oxford
14:25 London Paddington to Heathrow Terminal 5
14:27 Heathrow Terminal 5 to London Paddington
14:34 Didcot Parkway to Banbury
14:55 London Paddington to Heathrow Terminal 5
14:57 Heathrow Terminal 5 to London Paddington
15:03 Oxford to London Paddington
15:07 Oxford to Didcot Parkway
15:25 London Paddington to Heathrow Terminal 5
15:27 Heathrow Terminal 5 to London Paddington
15:34 Didcot Parkway to Oxford
15:55 London Paddington to Heathrow Terminal 5
15:57 Heathrow Terminal 5 to London Paddington
16:27 Heathrow Terminal 5 to London Paddington
17:34 Oxford to Didcot Parkway
18:00 Didcot Parkway to Oxford
18:34 Oxford to Didcot Parkway
19:05 Didcot Parkway to Oxford
Short Run
11:57 Great Malvern to London Paddington
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
12:37 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
12:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:08 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
13:09 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
13:11 Taunton to Cardiff Central
13:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
13:27 Okehampton to Exeter Central
13:38 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
13:42 Banbury to Didcot Parkway
13:48 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
14:08 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
14:15 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
14:32 Exeter Central to Okehampton
14:38 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
16:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
Delayed
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
12:35 Didcot Parkway to Banbury
12:51 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
13:00 Oxford to London Paddington
14:06 London Paddington to Newbury
etc
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 01, 2025, 14:00:08 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[114] Brighton Belle - merged topics
[99] Cash payments for transport services
[56] Steam excursion - except there's much more diesel than steam!
[46] May Timetable Change
[46] Longer distance canal walks - public transport for one way sec...
[32] "Save the Last Remaining British Rail Hovercraft from Destruct...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 76 77 [78] 79 80 ... 176
  Print  
Author Topic: Great Western Main Line electrification - ongoing discussion  (Read 1217169 times)
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10240



View Profile
« Reply #1155 on: April 12, 2015, 18:04:20 »

I assume the footbridge in the foreground will now be removed.

Pardon the pun, but it is hardly a step forward if the new footbridge is further from the station exit or further to walk for potential passengers wanting to cross the line for a train.  However without a number of lengthy possessions I suppose there was no alternative.
Logged
BerkshireBugsy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1642


Berkshire Bugsy Jr


View Profile
« Reply #1156 on: April 12, 2015, 18:09:23 »

I assume the footbridge in the foreground will now be removed.

Pardon the pun, but it is hardly a step forward if the new footbridge is further from the station exit or further to walk for potential passengers wanting to cross the line for a train.  However without a number of lengthy possessions I suppose there was no alternative.

Bobm - there is still some work to be done on the new bridge before it can be put into use. For example at the bottom of the bridge steps (on the Thatcham side at least) there is a big gap which will need to be filled with concrete.

I know this has been discussed elsewhere in a different thread but as expected  there are no ramps or lifts and as bobm says they are quite a way down the platform.

Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5347


View Profile
« Reply #1157 on: April 12, 2015, 19:15:11 »

Is there a level crossing behind the photographer?   The OHLE (Over-Head Line Equipment (electrification via catenary)) sometimes has to rise up in height over a crossing, and this might constrain the footbridge position, as will the existing platform buildings of course.  There might be no other position that clears the existing buildings on either side and also allows for space beyond for future lifts to be added.

There remains a slim possibility they chose the site at random...

Paul
Logged
Thatcham Crossing
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 793


View Profile
« Reply #1158 on: April 12, 2015, 19:34:29 »

Yes, there is Paul7755, Berkshire Bugsy was standing on the crossing when he took the picture.

The new bridge must have gone up over the weekend BB as it definitely wasn't there on Friday evening when I drove past.
Logged
BerkshireBugsy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1642


Berkshire Bugsy Jr


View Profile
« Reply #1159 on: April 12, 2015, 19:37:48 »

Yes, there is Paul7755, Berkshire Bugsy was standing on the crossing when he took the picture.

The new bridge must have gone up over the weekend BB as it definitely wasn't there on Friday evening when I drove past.

Thanks TC (Train Crew, or Travelling Chef, depending on context) - I drove up Friday night and think I would have seen it.

Here are a couple of additional pictures showing the new bridge placement in respect of the existing structures. I have had trouble posting these so apologies if they are duplicates
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #1160 on: April 20, 2015, 13:09:20 »

I assume the footbridge in the foreground will now be removed.

Pardon the pun, but it is hardly a step forward if the new footbridge is further from the station exit or further to walk for potential passengers wanting to cross the line for a train.  However without a number of lengthy possessions I suppose there was no alternative.

Bobm - there is still some work to be done on the new bridge before it can be put into use. For example at the bottom of the bridge steps (on the Thatcham side at least) there is a big gap which will need to be filled with concrete.

I know this has been discussed elsewhere in a different thread but as expected  there are no ramps or lifts and as bobm says they are quite a way down the platform.


Really? No ramps or lifts? I'm very surprised if that's not in contravention of the Disabled Access Act, or whatever it's called.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
BerkshireBugsy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1642


Berkshire Bugsy Jr


View Profile
« Reply #1161 on: April 20, 2015, 13:12:13 »

I assume the footbridge in the foreground will now be removed.

Pardon the pun, but it is hardly a step forward if the new footbridge is further from the station exit or further to walk for potential passengers wanting to cross the line for a train.  However without a number of lengthy possessions I suppose there was no alternative.



Bobm - there is still some work to be done on the new bridge before it can be put into use. For example at the bottom of the bridge steps (on the Thatcham side at least) there is a big gap which will need to be filled with concrete.

I know this has been discussed elsewhere in a different thread but as expected  there are no ramps or lifts and as bobm says they are quite a way down the platform.


Really? No ramps or lifts? I'm very surprised if that's not in contravention of the Disabled Access Act, or whatever it's called.

I haven't been down there for a week but my understanding is that because there are ramps to each platform and it is possible to cross via the level crossing they are not needed.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13350


View Profile Email
« Reply #1162 on: April 20, 2015, 13:14:00 »

Yes, that is correct
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #1163 on: April 20, 2015, 13:17:21 »

Ok, thanks!
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6624


View Profile
« Reply #1164 on: May 11, 2015, 06:16:07 »

If you want to see what services are looking like during the work between Bath-Chippenham 18-31 July and from 1 August, these are now showing on Real Time Trains. A place I regularly visit for timetables during Engineering works on the FGW (First Great Western) network now FGW don't bother any more (sigh)
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6624


View Profile
« Reply #1165 on: June 12, 2015, 16:50:34 »

We have a timetable for phase 1 of the works between Chippenham and Bath from 18th-31st July:
https://www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/-/media/pdf/travel-updates/gw1506%20bath%20timetable%20v4.pdf?la=en
Logged
Phil
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2062



View Profile
« Reply #1166 on: June 12, 2015, 19:31:32 »

Parochial, I know, but I can't help but love how Melksham gets a namecheck in the timetable headings ["LONDON TO SWINDON, MELKSHAM, BATH,
BRISTOL AND SOUTH WALES"] whereas Trowbridge doesn't. Ha.
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6643


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #1167 on: June 12, 2015, 23:25:41 »

Parochial, I know, but I can't help but love how Melksham gets a namecheck in the timetable headings ["LONDON TO SWINDON, MELKSHAM, BATH,
BRISTOL AND SOUTH WALES"] whereas Trowbridge doesn't. Ha.

Surely a mere oversight, given Trowbridge's legendary status in the field of, er, ...
Logged

Now, please!
Phil
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2062



View Profile
« Reply #1168 on: June 13, 2015, 06:46:20 »


Surely a mere oversight, given Trowbridge's legendary status in the field of, er, ...

Shorthand. Isaac Pitman was born there. To be fair, Trowbridge knew their rightful place in the world right up until British Rail's days, when the station was named "Trowbridge - Junction for Melksham"; it's only in recent years it's got ideas above it's station (as it were)

Anyway, back to the original subject....
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43944



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1169 on: June 13, 2015, 07:02:23 »

For those two weeks, Trowbridge will share the distinction with Coombe of being a station where trains pull up just short of the station (not at a platform) and reverse to carry on their journey.  I can kinda understand it at Coombe ... at a county town with a population of around 30,000 and 850,000 passenger journeys per year, it seems a bit of an odd thing to be doing!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 76 77 [78] 79 80 ... 176
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page