Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 14:15 01 May 2025
 
- Snake halts Japanese bullet trains after wrapping around power line
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 05/05/25 - Walk to Pilning
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM

On this day
1st May (1972)
Bristol Parkway station opens

Train RunningCancelled
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
13:46 Bristol Temple Meads to Warminster
13:57 Exmouth to Paignton
13:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
14:12 Newbury to Reading
14:23 London Paddington to Oxford
14:25 London Paddington to Heathrow Terminal 5
14:27 Heathrow Terminal 5 to London Paddington
14:34 Didcot Parkway to Banbury
14:55 London Paddington to Heathrow Terminal 5
14:57 Heathrow Terminal 5 to London Paddington
15:03 Oxford to London Paddington
15:07 Oxford to Didcot Parkway
15:25 London Paddington to Heathrow Terminal 5
15:27 Heathrow Terminal 5 to London Paddington
15:34 Didcot Parkway to Oxford
15:55 London Paddington to Heathrow Terminal 5
15:57 Heathrow Terminal 5 to London Paddington
16:27 Heathrow Terminal 5 to London Paddington
17:34 Oxford to Didcot Parkway
18:00 Didcot Parkway to Oxford
18:34 Oxford to Didcot Parkway
19:05 Didcot Parkway to Oxford
Short Run
11:57 Great Malvern to London Paddington
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
12:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:08 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
13:09 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
13:11 Taunton to Cardiff Central
13:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
13:38 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
13:42 Banbury to Didcot Parkway
14:08 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
14:32 Exeter Central to Okehampton
14:38 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
16:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
Delayed
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
12:51 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
13:34 Didcot Parkway to Oxford
14:06 London Paddington to Newbury
14:15 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
14:48 London Paddington to Swansea
15:30 Banbury to Didcot Parkway
15:34 Oxford to Didcot Parkway
16:07 Didcot Parkway to Oxford
16:35 Didcot Parkway to Banbury
16:35 Oxford to Didcot Parkway
etc
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 01, 2025, 14:34:25 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[114] Brighton Belle - merged topics
[99] Cash payments for transport services
[56] Steam excursion - except there's much more diesel than steam!
[46] May Timetable Change
[46] Longer distance canal walks - public transport for one way sec...
[32] "Save the Last Remaining British Rail Hovercraft from Destruct...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 89 90 [91] 92 93 ... 176
  Print  
Author Topic: Great Western Main Line electrification - ongoing discussion  (Read 1217603 times)
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10456


View Profile
« Reply #1350 on: November 10, 2015, 13:18:13 »

It would be nice if a design award was in the pipeline (as a matter of fact I think the design of the small part stuff is rather pleasing, less so the gantries!), but far more important for me is that the wires don't come down when it gets windy and if a pantograph gets snagged up it only pulls down the wires above one track rather than all four so trains can keep running.  The recent installations to a similar design in the North-West seem to be achieving that aim, so I'm hopeful the GWML (Great Western Main Line) scheme will as well.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5503


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #1351 on: November 10, 2015, 13:23:23 »

I do appreciate that the BT&CC was a tramway system.   Smiley

I don't accept that 25kV is intrinsically ugly: choices are made which result in an ugly appearance. NR» (Network Rail - home page) seems to be the last bastion of brutalism; the civils on the Borders Railway look quite awful in places. Ugly doesn't necessarily mean cheap either; it can be a sign of bad (rushed?) design.







Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Gordon the Blue Engine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 753


View Profile
« Reply #1352 on: November 10, 2015, 14:36:28 »


I don't accept that 25kV is intrinsically ugly: choices are made which result in an ugly appearance. NR» (Network Rail - home page) seems to be the last bastion of brutalism; the civils on the Borders Railway look quite awful in places. Ugly doesn't necessarily mean cheap either; it can be a sign of bad (rushed?) design.

I agree. The railway industry expends a lot of effort into making trains, bridges, stations etc look aesthetically pleasing.  So why doesn^t the same effort go into OHLE (Over-Head Line Equipment (electrification via catenary)) design?  OHLE is never going to look pretty, but what is going up between Reading and Didcot looks far worse than it need be - just have a look of some earlier OHLE around the country eg at the detail design of the mast/gantry interface.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19310



View Profile
« Reply #1353 on: November 10, 2015, 14:54:42 »

If it makes the trains go and doesn't come down in a light breeze I care little what it looks like.
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #1354 on: November 10, 2015, 15:28:01 »

Does anybody have any photographs of what has been installed in the disputed area?  I don't normally travel that way so haven't seen recent progress.  Is it anything like this http://www.furrerfrey.ch/en/furrerfrey/news-overview/2015/q1/TTC-SIC-MAB.html in which case if it is then I don't really see what all the fuss is about Tongue Roll Eyes
« Last Edit: November 10, 2015, 15:45:38 by SandTEngineer » Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #1355 on: November 10, 2015, 15:33:33 »

Have nothing on your railway that you do not know to be useful and believe to be beautiful.

But what might be true for the personal seems less so for the public, due to the wide variance in what we believe to be beautiful and even what we consider useful. Despite this, beauty in the public might even be more important than in the private sphere simply because it is public. And function even more so! If a functional object is flawed in its function by attempts to make it beautiful then it cannot truly be said to be either beautiful or functional.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13350


View Profile Email
« Reply #1356 on: November 10, 2015, 15:37:43 »

Does anybody have any photographs of what has been installed in the disputed area? 



Logged
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1454


View Profile
« Reply #1357 on: November 10, 2015, 15:43:35 »

When I saw the second photo on the campaign website I thought it didn't make a good case as it showed a built up area.
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #1358 on: November 10, 2015, 15:52:20 »

Hang on a minute.  Is that a NG (Natural Gas) Powerline I see in the distance of the second photograph?  The OLE (Overhead Line Equipment, more often "OHLE") looks quite good compared with that as its obviously at a much lower level.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13350


View Profile Email
« Reply #1359 on: November 10, 2015, 15:55:09 »

Those lines were likely in place before the AONB (Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty) was established
Logged
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1454


View Profile
« Reply #1360 on: November 10, 2015, 17:21:58 »

There have been power lines in the area at least since the 1940s (probably the 1930s) - albeit they would have been a lower voltage grid then.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8643



View Profile
« Reply #1361 on: November 10, 2015, 18:43:38 »

I'm a believer in form following function but that second photo looks awful, those stanchions are a blot on the landscape  Sad
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5680



View Profile
« Reply #1362 on: November 10, 2015, 19:08:45 »

Has the second picture been digitally enhanced I wonder ?
It almost looks as though the trees behind the OHLE (Over-Head Line Equipment (electrification via catenary)) have been rendered darker than would be natural, in order that the relatively light coloured galvanised steelwork is more conspicuous than in real life.

Or perhaps a similar effect was achieved naturally on a day with intermittent sun and cloud, by waiting for the trees to under cloud and thereby darker, but the steelwork to be in brighter light and therefore more noticeable ?

The viewpoint also looks a little odd, perhaps taken from an aircraft, or drone, or from atop a tower, rather than from near ground level.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Visoflex
Full Member
***
Posts: 66


View Profile
« Reply #1363 on: November 10, 2015, 19:34:32 »


...Going back to OHLE (Over-Head Line Equipment (electrification via catenary)), my main point is that there appear to be multiple designs which make sense from cost and engineering, given that a variety of designs have been implemented. It would seem sensible to have involved the locals at an early stage, to try and avoid the suituation we apparently have now with NIMBYs moaning when it really is too late for NR» (Network Rail - home page) to realisticly do anything.

OHLE doesn't have to be fugly - like everything else, it's a choice:


Something like this perhaps
http://www.ribacompetitions.com/ols/shortlisted.html
« Last Edit: November 10, 2015, 23:52:18 by Visoflex » Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43946



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1364 on: November 10, 2015, 20:05:25 »


...Going back to OHLE (Over-Head Line Equipment (electrification via catenary)), my main point is that there appear to be multiple designs which make sense from cost and engineering, given that a variety of designs have been implemented. It would seem sensible to have involved the locals at an early stage, to try and avoid the suituation we apparently have now with NIMBYs moaning when it really is too late for NR» (Network Rail - home page) to realisticly do anything.


I have just come from a Network Rail Stakeholder's briefing in Bath, and (paraphrasing) comments included one that suggested that there were so many different sets of ground conditions, what needs to go on top, and what's around that "nearly every one is different".   A further comment suggested that a great dal of work has been done with interested institutional stakeholders of getting designs right for Bath to smooth the way of final designs through upcoming formal planning applications.  There is a significant issue through Sidney Gardens in terms of protecting both the look and feel of the place, and the safety of the public when electric wires at 25kV are put through and some compromises needed.   
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 89 90 [91] 92 93 ... 176
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page