Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 01:35 02 May 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 tomorrow - Walk to Pilning
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM

On this day
2nd May (1859)
Royal Albert Bridge opens

Train RunningNo cancellations or delays
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 02, 2025, 01:46:25 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[127] Low passenger numbers due to train unreliability
[82] Steam excursion - except there's much more diesel than steam!
[65] Spain / Portugal power outage
[51] Brighton Belle - merged topics
[44] Cash payments for transport services
[43] "Save the Last Remaining British Rail Hovercraft from Destruct...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: three bridges, but not Three Bridges  (Read 5384 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43948



View Profile WWW Email
« on: August 29, 2009, 20:18:31 »

One of these should be easy, one middlin and one quite tough ... but all three pictures show bridges that carry or carried railway lines that may not all be quite within FGW (First Great Western) territory, but aren't many miles from it either.






Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5347


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 29, 2009, 21:19:25 »

1. Waterloo - Waterloo East link bridge.

Did a double take when I saw the trees though  Undecided

Paul
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: August 29, 2009, 21:43:27 »

Second bridge is just east of Swindon on the A420?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43948



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #3 on: August 29, 2009, 22:04:58 »

1. Waterloo - Waterloo East link bridge.

Did a double take when I saw the trees though  Undecided

Paul

Yes ... the upper bridge is the current footbridge, the lower bridge used to carry the linking railway and in the background is the bridge from Charing Cross to Waterloo (East)

Second bridge is just east of Swindon on the A420?

Yes ... formally the Wilts and Berks canal went through the right mast arch

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: August 29, 2009, 22:08:27 »


Yes ... formally the Wilts and Berks canal went through the right mast arch


How can a canal be formal? Did it wear a bow tie?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43948



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #5 on: August 29, 2009, 22:17:31 »

How can a canal be formal? Did it wear a bow tie?

No - a cravat - the canal was around long before bow ties

"Formerly" it should have said!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19310



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: August 29, 2009, 22:36:26 »

No3. Wireworks Branch Bridge over the River Wye. Photo taken from the grounds of Tintern Abbey?
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43948



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #7 on: August 29, 2009, 22:53:54 »

No3. Wireworks Branch Bridge over the River Wye. Photo taken from the grounds of Tintern Abbey?

Yes, it *is* at Tintern over the Wye take from close to (but not in) the Abbey grounds.    It sounds like you know something more about this bridge that I do ... can you tell us more about "The Wireworks" and how it justified its own branch and bridge?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19310



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: August 29, 2009, 23:22:08 »

No3. Wireworks Branch Bridge over the River Wye. Photo taken from the grounds of Tintern Abbey?

Yes, it *is* at Tintern over the Wye take from close to (but not in) the Abbey grounds.    It sounds like you know something more about this bridge that I do ... can you tell us more about "The Wireworks" and how it justified its own branch and bridge?
This might help.....it's where I found the answer! Although I only looked for conformation. I visited Tintern Abbey many years ago on a school trip and remember walking over the bridge.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tintern_Wireworks_Branch
http://www.urban75.org/photos/wales/wye_photos.html
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43948



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #9 on: August 30, 2009, 06:11:45 »

This might help.....it's where I found the answer! Although I only looked for conformation. I visited Tintern Abbey many years ago on a school trip and remember walking over the bridge.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tintern_Wireworks_Branch
http://www.urban75.org/photos/wales/wye_photos.html

Many thanks for the follow up ... I woke this morning and woke, with a coffee, and reading the background information as why an incredibly short branch to nowhere-in-particular seems to heva been built in spite of such heavy engineering
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: August 30, 2009, 10:29:25 »

When I saw the title my immediate answer was the Brentford Branch.

To add to the fun now the answers are out why would I think Brentford Branch?

Also on the three bridges theme where was the only alledged place where three railway lines crossed each two on bridges one above the other?

And to make it harder what were the three railway companies (pre 1922)?

« Last Edit: August 30, 2009, 10:40:41 by eightf48544 » Logged
kazbear
Full Member
***
Posts: 31


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: August 30, 2009, 11:31:04 »

When I saw the title my immediate answer was the Brentford Branch.

To add to the fun now the answers are out why would I think Brentford Branch?
3 bridges on top of each other. Rail, Grand Union canal and the A4127
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #12 on: August 30, 2009, 12:23:48 »

When I saw the title my immediate answer was the Brentford Branch.

To add to the fun now the answers are out why would I think Brentford Branch?
3 bridges on top of each other. Rail, Grand Union canal and the A4127

Spot on. What about the second part, can give a clue definitely not GW» (Great Western - used as an abbreviation for the area / lines under the Great Western franchise, as opposed to FGW which includes "First", the company operating them too. For tickets - about)?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43948



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #13 on: August 31, 2009, 20:13:08 »


I'm blank on this one.   I'm thinking that it might be a South Wales Valley where there was a high level line going right across the valley and two others crossing below, but something from the distant past nags "Dudley" and I wouldn't be surprised if there was somewhere that three tube lines all go one above t'other.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
jakemonkfish
Full Member
***
Posts: 51


View Profile Email
« Reply #14 on: August 31, 2009, 21:05:22 »

Kings cross /St pancras mainlines north , as well as High speed 1 and say the north london line or possibly the circle & meteropolitean lines (though probably lots of 2 sets of lines crossing very close together). On a similar theme Clapham junction/battersea area especially with the West London line diving under to get to Clapham juntion. My other thought was yorkshire with disused lines crisscrossing each other ( inspired by railway walks)
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page