Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 07:35 01 May 2025
 
- North Korea: First road bridge to Russia 'significant' development
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 05/05/25 - Walk to Pilning
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM

On this day
1st May (1928)
Inauguaral non stop "Flying Scotsman" London to Edinburgh

Train RunningCancelled
07:03 London Paddington to Newbury
07:22 Newbury to Reading
Short Run
05:53 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
06:47 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
07:00 Gloucester to Plymouth
08:48 Newbury to London Paddington
13:11 Taunton to Cardiff Central
16:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
Delayed
06:02 Bristol Parkway to Carmarthen
06:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 01, 2025, 07:36:48 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[96] Cash payments for transport services
[85] Longer distance canal walks - public transport for one way sec...
[59] What and why - on the platform
[56] Delays because of a points failure between Bristol Parkway and...
[44] Experiences of a newcomer(?) to rail travel
[38] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3
  Print  
Author Topic: GW franchise  (Read 17824 times)
Zoe
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 754


View Profile
« on: September 28, 2010, 20:17:42 »

I know we are a few years off from the end of the franchise but the reality of the situation is that First own power cars and if they didn't win the franchise they could refuse to let the new franchisee have access to them.  The result of this is that First are likely to retain the Greater Western franchise indefinitely.  Is this fair?  There seems little point in having it refranchised if First are certain to win.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19310



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: September 28, 2010, 20:23:49 »

I'm sure any future 'Invitation to Tender' will take account of the rolling stock available. But it does make the service provision decisions a little more difficult, because, as it stands, any new franchisee will struggle to offer the same service as FGW (First Great Western) currently do without those extra power cars.

A bit of a headache for the DfT» (Department for Transport - about), and I agree, it's a very strong bargaining chip for FGW.
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19585



View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: September 28, 2010, 20:29:50 »

Hmm.  Roll Eyes
 
Well, in view of the determination of previous governments to interfere with the running of the railways, and the Department for Transport's fixation with 'micromanaging' them, in terms of setting franchise requirements - is it any wonder that certain TOCs (Train Operating Company) have acted to protect their own interests?

Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post (a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London), depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Bob_Blakey
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 881


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: September 29, 2010, 07:03:37 »

Surely, in the event that First Group failed to 'win' the new franchise, they would turn themselves into a mini-ROSCO» (Rolling Stock Owning Company - about) and offer the power cars to the new franchisee under some sort of leasing arrangement; it seems unlikely that any commercial organisation would allow valuable assets to lie around rusting not earning revenue.

Unless of course there is some DfT» (Department for Transport - about) / ORR» (Office of Rail and Road, formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) rule which would prevent this!?! 
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13348


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: September 29, 2010, 09:51:41 »

The HSTs (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) will be almost life-expired if FGW (First Great Western) win their franchise....
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: September 29, 2010, 10:10:17 »

The HSTs (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) will be almost life-expired if FGW (First Great Western) win their franchise....

There is an interesting article in Modern railways this month called Stargate 2025 where a "Time Traveller" finds himself in a 23 metre coach weighing just 32 tonnes with seats lined up with the windows low seat backs powered, travelling to Aberdeen. At present with two diesel locos but easily substituted for an electric loco and a seated DVT (Driving Van Trailer (carriage) or Deep Vein Thrombosis, depending on context) when the wires are slung. Apparently it's 5 minuteds quicker than the IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project. This will offer more capacity on routes, save money, give a consistent and safe service and meet customer requirements. Intended to replace HSTs.) time for teh journey.

Allegedly called HST20 by Captain Deltic.

I can guess who the author is, a well known advocate of hauled stock with loco changes at the end of the wires.

HSTs Life Expired?
Logged
XPT
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 181


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: September 29, 2010, 10:13:50 »

I can see FGW (First Great Western) winning the franchise yet again in 2013.  I think FGW will just go on forever, at least during our lifetime anyway.

I'm looking forward to May 2013 to see if another operator takes over.  It will be a refreshing change.  But I think I'll be dissapointed.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13348


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: September 29, 2010, 10:15:53 »

I reckon they'll get their 3-year extension now - to 2016.....
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43937



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #8 on: September 29, 2010, 10:58:09 »

The headlines on the franchise were that First are paying the government 1.1 billion pounds over the life of the perhaps-extended franchise, but the small print shows that the heaviest three payments are actually made in the final three years - as far as I recall, the net payment over the first seven years is/was 200k, and then 900k for the final three years.

On that basis, with the economy not as bright as it was in 2005, the decision First have to make may be far from obvious, and the fact that they own some of their own rolling stock might leave them in a position of some strength.  We might also expect to see (and indeed we are already seeing) some short-termism in the company's stance on certain things on the basis that the payback for any investment they make now needs to be very fast.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13348


View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: September 29, 2010, 11:34:15 »

Which indicates that they'll apply for the extension, assuming that they are currently turning a profit, which I believe they are.
Logged
Super Guard
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1308


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: September 29, 2010, 12:20:12 »

Which indicates that they'll apply for the extension, assuming that they are currently turning a profit, which I believe they are.


Can you confirm a source for the GW» (Great Western - used as an abbreviation for the area / lines under the Great Western franchise, as opposed to FGW which includes "First", the company operating them too. For tickets - about) franchise itself making a profit for First?
Logged

Any opinions made on this forum are purely personal and my own.  I am in no way speaking for, or offering the views of First Great Western or First Group.

If my employer feels I have broken any aspect of the Social Media Policy, please PM me immediately, so I can rectify without delay.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13348


View Profile Email
« Reply #11 on: September 29, 2010, 12:36:03 »

Press articles at the time of their last published results.
Logged
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: September 29, 2010, 15:07:39 »

Devil's advocate here, but is there any point at all in speculating this far ahead of time? ChrisB I would agree with you, think it's a fairly safe bet that the franchise will be extended to its full 10-year duration to 2016 barring some sudden and dramatic plunge in performance. That means that it will be a good 4 years or more before anyone even thinks about re-letting the franchise, and who knows what the financial or political climates will be like then. Let's be honest, we don't even really know if the franchising regime will continue in the same way it currently has.

So isn't this all something of a waste of time?

XPT, on what basis do you think First will have the franchise forever and why would that disappoint you? Do you really think that any of the other big companies like National Express or Stagecoach would be better in charge? Whoever ends up running the franchise can only work with the cards they are dealt by the government under the current system, which for FGW (First Great Western) weren't that great - an ageing fleet that's not really big enough for the job, and the promise of new trains snatched away from them.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13348


View Profile Email
« Reply #13 on: September 29, 2010, 15:27:52 »

Let's be honest, we don't even really know if the franchising regime will continue in the same way it currently has.

Hmmm, I'm on a focus group at the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) tomorrow afternoon giving the public view on whatever they outline....
Logged
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: September 29, 2010, 15:31:41 »

Would be interesting to hear some of the detail from that meeting, assuming it's not confidential! Wink
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2 3
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page