This is a test of GDPR / Cookie Acceptance [about our cookies]
Really irritating test - cookie expires in 24 hour!
London Waterloo - station, services, facilities, incidents - and some quirks / odd facts (merged posts)
6.5.2025 (Tuesday) 10:06 - All running AOK
 
London Waterloo - station, services, facilities, incidents - and some quirks / odd facts (merged posts)
Posted by JayMac at 00:48, 14th December 2012
 
In aid of The Samaritans, South West Trains have announced via twitter that actor Brian Blessed will be doing station announcements at London Waterloo on 18th December 2012.

https://twitter.com/SW_Trains/status/279268210388393987

Brian is a famously sweary bloke (plenty of youtube evidence for that) so I hope he will stick to his script on the day!

Re: Brian Blessed to be station announcer at Waterloo on 18th December 2012.
Posted by BerkshireBugsy at 06:35, 14th December 2012
 
Now that I would love to see - err - I mean hear !

Re: Brian Blessed to be station announcer at Waterloo on 18th December 2012.
Posted by trainer at 09:06, 14th December 2012
 
WILL HE NEED TO USE THE SPEAKER SYSTEM AS HE CAN BE VERY LOUD? 

(Sorry got into character when writing this.   )

Re: Brian Blessed to be station announcer at Waterloo on 18th December 2012.
Posted by BerkshireBugsy at 09:20, 14th December 2012
 
WILL HE NEED TO USE THE SPEAKER SYSTEM AS HE CAN BE VERY LOUD? 

(Sorry got into character when writing this.   )

Thanks for posting what I was thinking!

Re: Brian Blessed to be station announcer at Waterloo on 18th December 2012.
Posted by Thatcham Crossing at 10:58, 14th December 2012
 
Would be great to hear some recordings....or You Tube clips from the Station of these being done :-)

Re: Brian Blessed to be station announcer at Waterloo on 18th December 2012.
Posted by BerkshireBugsy at 11:03, 14th December 2012
 
Would be great to hear some recordings....or You Tube clips from the Station of these being done :-)

Actually if the "please wait behind the yellow line" announcer at Reading P7 was not available, I would recommend Brian Blessed be hired on a temporary basis to make the announcements..

I can just hear it now "will be idiot on platform 7 who has 5 suitcases and 15 kids stop getting in everyones way"...mind you the intended recipient probably would hear it unless they take their earphones out

Re: Brian Blessed to be station announcer at Waterloo on 18th December 2012.
Posted by inspector_blakey at 22:30, 14th December 2012
 
Sick as a dog that I'm on annual leave on Tuesday...!!

Re: Brian Blessed to be station announcer at Waterloo on 18th December 2012.
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 03:56, 16th December 2012
 
Surely 'youtube'TM will be the answer? 

One of my favourites is Stephen Fry doing Brian Blessed impressions on QI ... 

Re: Brian Blessed to be station announcer at Waterloo on 18th December 2012.
Posted by Brucey at 19:48, 20th December 2012
 
It is such a shame that during this attempt to raise money for the Samaritans, a person was hit by a train at Earlsfield which resulted in the cancellation of all services from Waterloo during the evening peak.

Re: Brian Blessed to be station announcer at Waterloo on 18th December 2012.
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 09:44, 21st December 2012
 
Sad, and rather ironic ... 

Major Emergency Engineering at Waterloo - Sunday 14/04/2013
Posted by Brucey at 14:00, 13th April 2013
 
From a SWT email.  Anyone travelling Thursday or Friday evening will probably have already felt the effects of this track defect.
Major Emergency Engineering at London Waterloo affecting the South West Trains Network Sunday 14th April 2013

A rail defect was identified between London Waterloo and Vauxhall on Thursday afternoon. The nature of the defect has meant that a temporary speed restriction has had to be imposed which has resulted in a reduction to the number of trains we are able to run across the affected area.

Our engineers have been conducting regular inspections of the area and have advised us that the defect needs to be repaired as quickly as possible, before it deteriorates. We have looked at all possible options to carry out the work in a manner that will have the least amount of impact to our customers.

The engineering team will require 16 hours of access to the track to allow them to remove a rail crossing and replace it with a brand new one. The access required by the engineers will mean that platforms 1 to 10 at London Waterloo will be out of use on Sunday 14th April until approximately 16:00hrs. A very limited train service will run out of London Waterloo as a result of this work.

Please see below for a summary of train services affected by this work. Check here for  engineering improvement work that is already planned to take place aound the network.

West of England

Crewkerne to London Waterloo services at 22 minutes past each hour will terminate at Woking. The 13:22 service from Crewkerne will be the first train to run through to London Waterloo (as will all subsequent departures from Crewkerne).

London Waterloo to Crewkerne services will start from Woking (at 46 minutes past each hour). The 17:15 service will be the first train to start from London Waterloo (as will all subsequent departures).

A train service will run between London Waterloo and Woking in both directions however we expect these services to be very busy.

Suburban - Ewell West

Buses will replace trains between Ewell West and Wimbledon until approximately 15:00. Customers should change at Wimbledon for an onward train service. The times of the first trains to run between Ewell West and London Waterloo are listed below:

14:50 Ewell West to Waterloo
16:32 London Waterloo to Ewell West

All subsequent departures after these times will be trains services (not buses).

Until approximately 15:00 Buses will depart Wimbledon bound for Ewell West at 2 & 32 minutes past each hour, and Ewell West bound for Wimbledon at 19 & 49 minutes past each hour.

Suburban - Guildford (via Cobham)

London Waterloo to Guildford (via Cobham) services will start from Surbiton (at 32 minutes past each hour). The 17:00 service will be the first train to start from London Waterloo (as will all subsequent trains).

Guildford to London Waterloo (via Cobham) services at 50 minutes past each hour will terminate at Surbiton. The 14:50 service from Guildford will be the first train to run though to London Waterloo (as will all subsequent departures). A train service will run between Surbiton and London Waterloo in both directions however we expect these services to be very busy.

Suburban - Chessington South

London Waterloo to Chessington South services will start from Wimbledon (at 10 & 40 minutes past each hour). The 16:51 service will be the first train to start from London Waterloo (as will all subsequent departures).

Chessington South to London Waterloo services at 10 & 40 minutes past each hour will terminate at Wimbledon. The 15:10 service will be the first train to run through to London Waterloo (as will all subsequent departures).

A train service will run between London Waterloo and Wimbledon in both directions however we expect these services to be very busy.

Windsor & Eton Riverside

An hourly service will run between London Waterloo and Windsor & Eton Riverside in both directions until mid-afternoon. Trains will depart London Waterloo at 44 minutes past each hour. Trains will depart Windsor & Eton Riverside at 01 minute past each hour. A twice hourly service will resume between London Waterloo and Windsor & Eton Riverside by mid-afternoon.

Kingston

Kingston to London Waterloo services at 11 minutes past each hour will not run until 15:11 (and all subsequent trains). Alternative train services are available from Kingston to London Waterloo via Richmond.

London Waterloo to Kingston services at 56 minutes past each hour will not run until 15:56 (and all subsequent trains). Alternative train services are available from London Waterloo to Kingston via Richmond.

We are sorry for the inconvenience the additional work this Sunday will cause  while you travel on our network. We are working to repair the fault at the earliest possible opportunity to enable us to deliver our full service again from Monday 15th April.

Re: Major Emergency Engineering at Waterloo - Sunday 14/03/2013
Posted by Oxman at 16:07, 13th April 2013
 
You might like to correct the date in the topic heading.

Re: Major Emergency Engineering at Waterloo - Sunday 14/04/2013
Posted by Brucey at 16:12, 13th April 2013
 
You might like to correct the date in the topic heading.
Thanks Oxman.  Clearly not thinking correctly today.

Re: Major Emergency Engineering at Waterloo - Sunday 14/04/2013
Posted by bobm at 19:24, 13th April 2013
 
It could have been worse - had it occured on either of the two previous weekends when FGW were using Waterloo for WoE services.

Re: Major Emergency Engineering at Waterloo - Sunday 14/04/2013
Posted by ChrisB at 14:39, 14th April 2013
 
Or next Sunday - the London Marathon....

Re: Major Emergency Engineering at Waterloo - Sunday 14/04/2013
Posted by Brucey at 14:43, 14th April 2013
 
Person hit by a train at South Croydon earlier resulted in considerable delays on all routes from London to Southampton and Portsmouth.  That is in addition to the engineering work already planned between Haslemere-Petersfield.

Re: Major Emergency Engineering at Waterloo - Sunday 14/04/2013
Posted by MrC at 17:20, 14th April 2013
 
Or next Sunday - the London Marathon....

Oops. Work not carried out due to on-site equipment failure and currently proposed to be re-scheduled for 20/21.......

Re: Major Emergency Engineering at Waterloo - Sunday 14/04/2013
Posted by Brucey at 17:29, 14th April 2013
 
B****r.  I am making several tight connections through Waterloo on both Saturday and Sunday next week.

Here is the official info from SWT: http://www.southwesttrains.co.uk/MEW.aspx

Copied here, for when the website is updated:
Work was due to take place on 13/14 April to repair a rail defect in the Waterloo area. This was a major piece of work that needed around 16 hours to complete and this work had been scheduled to take place at the earliest possible opportunity.

Unfortunately due to a problem with the technical equipment being used by our external contractors carrying the work, the work could not be completed over the weekend. These technical equipment problems were only uncovered as the work commenced.

We are extremely disappointed that this work could not take place as planned and we are following this up with our external contractors as a matter of priority.

The work is now being planned to take place at the next possible opportunity and to ensure the least amount of impact on our customers.  The work is currently scheduled to take place over the weekend of 20/21 April.  We will confirm more details about the impact this major engineering work will have on our services early next week.  In the meantime, our dedicated team of engineers will continue to monitor the area to enable us to continue to deliver our normal train service.

At this stage, we are not expecting this to have any impact on any of our services over the coming week, and we are planning to run our full train service on Monday 15 April.   We will keep you informed of any further changes needed to facilitate this major engineering work.
Laughable is an understatement.

Re: Major Emergency Engineering at Waterloo - Sunday 14/04/2013
Posted by ChrisB at 19:47, 14th April 2013
 
And how many 000's of marathon runners wont niw be able to use the trains to get into London. Reckon there's going to be trouble ahead....

Re: Major Emergency Engineering at Waterloo - Sunday 14/04/2013
Posted by Brucey at 22:09, 14th April 2013
 
It will be interesting to see the revised timetable.  One would hope the bulk of the work will be done overnight.

Re: Major Emergency Engineering at Waterloo - Sunday 14/04/2013
Posted by Brucey at 14:08, 16th April 2013
 
The amended timetable has been released at http://www.southwesttrains.co.uk/MEW.aspx

I won't copy the entire timetable here, just the summary is included below:
Work was due to take place on 13/14 April to repair a rail defect in the Waterloo area. This was a major piece of work that needed around 16 hours to complete.

Unfortunately due to a problem with the technical equipment supplied by our external contractors, the work could not be completed on 13/14 April.

The work has now been planned to take place on Sunday 21st April. Customers with advance tickets that are booked to travel on specific trains are able to use other services as  fare restrictions have been lifted on Sunday 21 April.  A normal Saturday train service will run on Saturday 20th April.

The access required by the engineers will mean that platforms 1 to 10 at London Waterloo will be out of use on Sunday 21 April until approximately 16:00hrs.

A very limited train service will run out of London Waterloo as a result of this work.

Once the work has been completed at 1600hrs a full Sunday service will operate with some trains formed of more coaches than normal.

This work will be taking place in addition to our regular programme of engineering improvement work. Please check here to see how these works may also affect your journey.

London Marathon Participant / Spectator Advice

We strongly advise customers travelling on our services to check before you travel and allow more time to complete your journey. This is due to a significant reduction in the number of trains we can run into and out of London Waterloo until 1600hrs due to the work taking place; we expect all services running into London Waterloo will be extremely busy.

Alterations to your Train Service

Please use the expandable links below for more details about the service on Sunday 21 April. Please also note that our timetable is being amended to reflect these alterations and this information is currently not showing in the online Journey Planners. This will be available on Thursday 18 April.

London Waterloo - station, services, facilities, incidents - and some quirks / odd facts (merged posts)
Posted by johngreg at 14:15, 5th July 2013
 
Given the fact that Platform 20 is apparently coming back into use next year, what is the difference with this platform to the others?

http://www.southwesttrains.co.uk/Historic-journey-marks-the-first-anniversary-of-the-South-West-Trains-and-Network-Rail-Alliance.aspx

Re: Eurostar platforms at Waterloo
Posted by stuving at 15:14, 5th July 2013
 
I think it can be accessed on the level from 19. For the others they would need to rebuild what is now access from underneath.

Re: Eurostar platforms at Waterloo
Posted by Andrew1939 from West Oxon at 16:25, 5th July 2013
 
Why is it necessary to rebuild? It was always easy enough to move to and from domestic and the international trains in the days of Eurostar use. Most people arriving or departing Waterloo go to or from the outside world simply because it is a terminus. There can be some domestic transfer traffic but how much is that of the total movements?

Re: Eurostar platforms at Waterloo
Posted by Brucey at 16:59, 5th July 2013
 
The international platforms (except 20) all require access via an escalator or stairs to the concourse below.

Being a Waterloo commuter, I can imagine the chaos if you tried to fit as 12 coach Class 450 of passengers (over 1000 people, all of whom are in an unnecessary rush) down the few escalators that are there at present.

Re: Eurostar platforms at Waterloo
Posted by Electric train at 17:46, 5th July 2013
 
Number of factors.
The concourses below platform level were constructed as separate arrivals and departures apparently its not easy to link them together, also they exit at low level all of which were not built to the passenger density of commuter trains
The throat for the international platforms was built for 4 per hour arrival and departure to make use of all the international platforms will require extensive throat remodelling.
There are also longer term plans being expressed by the land owners of the office buildings along York Road which could incorporate the international platforms, its likely the international station will be demolished in the longer term

London Waterloo - station, services, facilities, incidents - and some quirks / odd facts (merged posts)
Posted by broadgage at 17:23, 2nd August 2013
 
Due to emergency engineering work, dont know if it is heat related or something else.
Many cancellations, and other services running only part of the route.

Details on SWT website.

Re: Major disruption at Waterloo tonight (02/08/2013)
Posted by Brucey at 20:31, 2nd August 2013
 
There were two issues, one at Waterloo and the other somewhere between New Malden and Surbiton on the down fast.

This was the second day of disruption for many Waterloo commuters.

Domestic Trains start to use Waterloo International Platforms
Posted by ChrisB at 15:04, 23rd October 2013
 
First test train - a 5car 485, I think - in & out of Platform 20 this morning.

RealTime Trains has it thus

Re: Domestic Trains start to use Waterloo International Platforms
Posted by paul7575 at 15:33, 23rd October 2013
 
It was apparently just a normal in service 455 diverted into P20 as it's been declared available for public use.  Testing and train crew familiarity runs using various stock has been going on for some months, and is still planned, looking ahead in realtime trains; but there doesn't seem to be any regular passenger services in the short term.

Photo from Paul Bigland here:  http://paulbigland.zenfolio.com/p368327642/h39272067#h39272067

The 458/5s are are not yet in passenger service, I wouldn't expect them to be accepted for a few weeks yet.  With the second only arriving this week I'd expect they've still got multiple working to test, and mileage accumulation etc etc.

Paul

Re: Domestic Trains start to use Waterloo International Platforms
Posted by ChrisB at 15:40, 23rd October 2013
 
Yes, it was Paul Bigland's tweets that alerted me.

There are some photos of the 458/5s in his photo set too

Re: Domestic Trains start to use Waterloo International Platforms
Posted by Brucey at 19:12, 23rd October 2013
 
Regular use of this platform is much needed.  There is often a queue for platforms during the peaks (mainly built into the timetable, so journey times may reduce).

The design of Waterloo's tracks also means that one simple problem can put four platforms out of use immediately and over half the station whilst it is being repaired.

London Waterloo - station, facilities, incidents - and some quirks / odd facts (merged posts)
Posted by stuving at 23:29, 23rd March 2016
 
Network Rail and SWT have officially announced the start and schedule for the planned work to increase capacity at Waterloo. They have headlined it as costing ^800 million, which sounds a lot for stretching platforms 1-4 a bit and reopening 21-24. I'm sure they are counting the Class 707 order in that, and probably other things too. I'm also a bit puzzled why it would take nearly two years (ending December 2018) to make Waterloo International operation again, unless they are going to do a lot to the track.

The BBC's report in this case confuses things somewhat - I can't see platforms 1-4 serving Reading! But NR's statement, as well as SWT News, are a bit more factual:
  • Rebuild the former Waterloo International Terminal, allowing platforms 20-24 to be brought back into use with modern facilities, new track and signalling and a layout suitable for thousands of domestic passengers.
  • Extend platforms 1-4 to allow longer ten-car trains to run to London suburban stations. This work will take place during August 2017 and requires significant changes to the usual passenger timetable.
  • Create a spacious, modern and accessible station concourse near platforms 20-24.

There should be a DfT announcement too, but I can't see one (apart from a similar sounding one about new platforms and trains from 2011!)

Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Posted by Electric train at 06:50, 24th March 2016
 
Network Rail and SWT have officially announced the start and schedule for the planned work to increase capacity at Waterloo. They have headlined it as costing ^800 million, which sounds a lot for stretching platforms 1-4 a bit and reopening 21-24. I'm sure they are counting the Class 707 order in that, and probably other things too. I'm also a bit puzzled why it would take nearly two years (ending December 2018) to make Waterloo International operation again, unless they are going to do a lot to the track.

There is a lot of trackwork required to make the former International platforms work for domestic services; the International platforms were designed for I think 8 tph (4 in and 4 out) and have very limited connections to the domestic network.  There is also quite a bit of structural work to alter the old International station internal layout.

This announcement may also include the re-signalling already going on in the Waterloo area an perhaps the forthcoming Feltham re-signalling.

Its about time the owner of the International station (DfT) got their fingers out, if it had been anyone else leaving a major asset like that used in such a key transport hub there would have been questions in the House and much feet holding to flames in Select Committees.

Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Posted by IndustryInsider at 07:45, 24th March 2016
 
I heard this is causing problems for GWR as a planned diversion into Waterloo might not be able to happen.  Last I heard was a rumour they were investigating the possibility of HST's into Victoria!

Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Posted by Timmer at 08:14, 24th March 2016
 
I heard this is causing problems for GWR as a planned diversion into Waterloo might not be able to happen.  Last I heard was a rumour they were investigating the possibility of HST's into Victoria!
Interesting. Here's a challenge for someone, has an HST ever visited Victoria before?

Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Posted by paul7575 at 10:17, 24th March 2016
 
The BBC's report in this case confuses things somewhat - I can't see platforms 1-4 serving Reading! But NR's statement...

I think the main NR article has been updated since yesterday.   It previously included a link to an earlier article that included a timeline for the works, but this timeline seems to now be included.   

The timeline actually first surfaced in January, and showed that they have separated the platform work for the international platforms to allow temporary use next summer to work on P1-P8, but they will then re-close the international side for its new concourse and retail work to be finished:  http://www.networkrail.co.uk/wcip/   That earlier piece also does include a false statement that P1-P8 would close for a period in August 2017 to allow for 10 car trains to run to Windsor and Reading.   

The current misleading info seems to be that the work will allow 10 car trains to run on the main suburban side for the 'first time', yet they already run in small numbers into higher numbered platforms, i.e. other than the short P1-P4.

Paul

Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Posted by stuving at 10:04, 3rd November 2016
 
From the Architects' Journal:
Council approves plans to convert Grimshaw's former Eurostar terminal into shops
2 November, 2016 By Colin Marrs

Corstorphine + Wright has won permission to transform part of the former Eurostar terminal at Waterloo into shops, restaurants, cafés and bars – after Historic England declined to consider the Grimshaw structure for listing

London Borough of Lambeth’s planning committee last night (1 November) gave the thumbs-up to the new scheme to overhaul the former international departures and arrivals lounges, creating 12,444m² of new facilities.

Work has already started on revamping the five platforms within the disused station - the landmark building with its lattice-work arches which sits above the proposed shopping and leisure complex - to increase the number of domestic train services into Waterloo.

In May the 20th Century Society applied for the entire structure to be Grade II listed, but this option has been rejected by Historic England.
...

Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Posted by paul7575 at 11:46, 3rd November 2016
 
I don't see any architectural merit at all in the concrete box structures that exist below platform level.

The problem for me (with a range of similar articles over the years) is that they often don't adequately explain which area of the station they are going on about.   I wish they'd emphasise more that they are at the outside (York Rd) street level, and one floor above, and won't really be seen from the station concourse.

Paul

Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Posted by Surrey 455 at 21:27, 3rd November 2016
 
A leaflet from Network Rail and SWT I was given a few weeks ago states that fewer trains will run into Waterloo between 5th to 28th August 2017 because platforms 1-9 will be closed so they can extend platforms 1-4 . These platforms are used for routes via Wimbledon.

Detailed information will be published later about how routes and stations are going to be affected.

Delays and cancellations out of London Waterloo - 31 Jan 17
Posted by bobm at 16:10, 31st January 2017
 
A lot of disruption on SWT services after two people hit by trains in separate incidents at New Malden and Woking.

Warnings of delays up to two hours until the end of service.

Re: Delays and cancellations out of London Waterloo - 31 Jan 17
Posted by ChrisB at 16:26, 31st January 2017
 
Kingston Loop & Haslemere services withdrawn for the day

New voice at Waterloo
Posted by Surrey 455 at 23:12, 25th July 2017
 
I've been away for 2 weeks and when I got back to work yesterday I noticed that Phil Sayers announcements had been replaced by a new female voice. It wasn't Celia and it wasn't the voice at Paddington and others. I haven't heard that voice before. Don't yet know if it's being used at other SWT stations.

I presume the new voice has been commissioned because of the change of franchise coming up and that the name of the new franchise operator has already recorded. As Phil passed away last year it would not have been possible to announce the new name using the existing recordings.

Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Posted by stuving at 10:04, 26th July 2017
 
It was announced at the beginning of July that platform 10 will be closed as well as 1-9. Supposedly this is to make sure the work can be finished in the time allowed. So, whatever you had been expecting, expect worse!

Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Posted by paul7575 at 10:55, 26th July 2017
 
It was announced at the beginning of July that platform 10 will be closed as well as 1-9. Supposedly this is to make sure the work can be finished in the time allowed. So, whatever you had been expecting, expect worse!

I think it's because the track layout (S&C) changes in the throat extend much further out than originally expected. So preventing trains reaching P10. This might be an indication that certain works that should have been completed in advance were not done when planned.  As well as the obvious lengthening of P1-4, P5-6 are being shortened, and the nose of P7-8 is being realigned.

It's surprising there's not yet been detailed 'before and after' track plans in the rail mags, it's been known that the former international platforms and approaches were finished some months back, test running started a few weeks ago.

Another news item is that for the last (short Tue-Fri) working week of August, while London Bridge area is closed, Southeastern are running a 2 tph Ramsgate service into P21/22.

Paul

Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Posted by Electric train at 20:44, 27th July 2017
 
Another news item is that for the last (short Tue-Fri) working week of August, while London Bridge area is closed, Southeastern are running a 2 tph Ramsgate service into P21/22.

To achieve this has take 8 months of prep work on the Linford Street Curve, since Eurostar ceased the line had been effectively mothballed, the electrification equipment had suffered severe damage due to lightning a number of years ago, the DfT agreeing to leaving it out of service, a temporary solution is being put in place for this August use and possible use at Christmas. 

Driver route training commence at the beginning of July

Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Posted by stuving at 21:24, 27th July 2017
 
Most of the material produced on this upgrade (both material and immaterial) has the logos of NR, SWT, and "funded by UK government". However, NR's animated video showing what they are doing (on SWT's upgrade site) ends with "in partnership with" LCR as well as the other two. Do they still have some form of ownership of the erstwhile international terminal?

Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Posted by Electric train at 22:25, 27th July 2017
 
Most of the material produced on this upgrade (both material and immaterial) has the logos of NR, SWT, and "funded by UK government". However, NR's animated video showing what they are doing (on SWT's upgrade site) ends with "in partnership with" LCR as well as the other two. Do they still have some form of ownership of the erstwhile international terminal?

Yes LCR do as their web site says For over 20 years, LCR has been managing, developing and disposing of property assets within a railway context, and in particular assets associated with major infrastructure projects. As guardians of public land, we have a role to play in the Government’s drive for homes, jobs and economic growth.

Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Posted by ellendune at 22:45, 27th July 2017
 
LCR are not really who you think they are. They no longer own the CTRL (HS1) and are essential another government owned property company.  For a full explanatiom see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_and_Continental_Railways

Re: New voice at Waterloo
Posted by Surrey 455 at 23:37, 27th July 2017
 
I noticed today both AM and PM and yesterday evening that the new automated announcements at Waterloo are suffering with teething problems. A platform announcement will be made and often there is either a long pause before continuing or a long pause whilst reading out a list of some stations served and missing out others.

Re: New voice at Waterloo
Posted by Louis94 at 13:02, 28th July 2017
 
It is Celia, however she has re-recorded everything and sounds quite different. It is an upgraded system SWT have been slowly implementing, this is the latest addition however it is the first for a few months. It is at a number of other stations including Eastleigh, Winchester and Southampton Airport Parkway. It does seem to be a bit unreliable mind.

Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Posted by IndustryInsider at 12:14, 14th August 2017
 
The traditional timelapse video of the 'orange army' of work so far completed can be viewed here:

https://www.networkrailmediacentre.co.uk/news/timelapse-60-000-man-hours-in-60-seconds#

Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Posted by rogerw at 16:43, 14th August 2017
 
Off to have my own look on Thursday, at least as much as you can see from a train.

Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Posted by SandTEngineer at 18:16, 14th August 2017
 
If you want to look at it all from your armchair, this link was posted on the WNXX Forum: http://sentry.og2.co.uk/waterloo

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by Timmer at 07:52, 15th August 2017
 
Well what they hoped wouldn't happen has happened, an incident outside Waterloo station involving an engineering train and a passenger train having a coming together at a set of points.

SWT are saying 'avoid Waterloo'.

Judging by the pictures on Paul Clifton's Twitter feed there could be major disruption for quite sometime:
https://twitter.com/PaulCliftonBBC

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by GBM at 08:44, 15th August 2017
 
From the BBC http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-40933704
Train derails outside London Waterloo station
5 minutes ago
Three people were checked over by London Ambulance Service but no-one was hurt
Passengers have been advised to avoid London Waterloo station all day after a train derailed outside the station.
The train partly left the tracks as it was pulling away from a platform at low speed at 05:40 BST, Network Rail said.
Three people were checked over by London Ambulance Service but nobody was taken to hospital.
Ten platforms are already shut as part of engineering works to enlarge the station's capacity.
The station is usually one of the busiest in the UK
Passengers were already affected by ongoing engineering works
Waterloo works: What you wanted to know
Emergency services including police, paramedics and fire crews were called to the scene.
Photos shared by passengers on social media suggest the passenger train had struck an engineering wagon.
Chris Denham, a spokesman for Network Rail, told the BBC the partially derailed train had blocked three of the platforms so only very limited services could run.
"If you don't have to travel to Waterloo today, please don't," he said.
Passengers are being advised to use alternative routes
South West Trains said there would be a very limited service running to and from Waterloo "which is expected for the rest of today".
Many of the trains running have been cancelled or are are stopping or starting short of the station, the rail operator said.
Passengers are being advised to use alternative routes and have been warned other stations in the area will be "very busy" with the possibility of queuing systems being put in place.
The ongoing £800m engineering project at Waterloo will prepare the station for longer trains and provide space for 30% extra passengers during the busiest times of the day.
The station is usually one of the busiest in the UK, with an average of 270,000 journeys made to and from it each day.

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by BBM at 09:55, 15th August 2017
 
There appears to be some diversions of SWT West of England services into Reading. I've just spotted on Open Train Times a 1Z26 which has gone via Mortimer into P3 at RDG. It's not showing up on RTT but on LDB there's a 0945 arrival at Reading from Exeter St David's via Salisbury and Basingstoke. The next departure that way showing on LDB is a 1002 from RDG to Salisbury. That's then followed by a 1011 arrival from EXD departing back there at 1047. None of these currently appear on RTT at RDG.

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by SandTEngineer at 10:24, 15th August 2017
 
Back to Waterloo.  You can see the position of the engineering train wagons and the derailed train here: http://sentry.og2.co.uk/images/ICE00012/2017-08-15/ICE00012-2017-08-15_102200.jpg



Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by Timmer at 10:36, 15th August 2017
 
There appears to be some diversions of SWT West of England services into Reading. I've just spotted on Open Train Times a 1Z26 which has gone via Mortimer into P3 at RDG. It's not showing up on RTT but on LDB there's a 0945 arrival at Reading from Exeter St David's via Salisbury and Basingstoke. The next departure that way showing on LDB is a 1002 from RDG to Salisbury. That's then followed by a 1011 arrival from EXD departing back there at 1047. None of these currently appear on RTT at RDG.
Yes according to Journeycheck all Exeter to Waterloo services are being diverted to/from Reading. The Benefits of diesel powered trains.

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by stuving at 11:10, 15th August 2017
 
That engineering train is in P10, isn't it? The very one that (with its approach line(s)) was made part of the possession by a late change in July? So, if there was something in the plans or instructions to signallers that wasn't changed then, so a train leaving P11 could use the line to P10 ...

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by paul7575 at 11:18, 15th August 2017
 
That engineering train is in P10, isn't it? The very one that (with its approach line(s)) was made part of the possession by a late change in July? So, if there was something in the plans or instructions to signallers that wasn't changed then, so a train leaving P11 could use the line to P10 ...

AIUI the engineering train has been in that position every day since the work started.  It ought to be impossible to set a route onto the line it is standing on.  Suggestions elsewhere that it is there as a physical barrier to protect the worksite.  So did it work?

Paul

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by broadgage at 11:39, 15th August 2017
 
Looking at the pictures, it seems a possibility that the engineering train was longer than was expected, or it had been moved, and that the passenger train then collided sidewise where the lines converge.
The damage looks limited perhaps suggesting that the driver of the EMU had time to brake, but not time to stop.
The EMU was leaving the station, so it must have arrived safely.

Under normal circumstances, track circuits on the line occupied by the freight should be interlocked with the platform starting signal and thus prevent this sort of accident.
During large scale engineering work, it is possible that the equipment was defective or disconnected, or even that it was BELIEVED to be defective when in fact it was working correctly.

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by paul7575 at 11:51, 15th August 2017
 
Looking at the pictures, it seems a possibility that the engineering train was longer than was expected, or it had been moved, and that the passenger train then collided sidewise where the lines converge.
I've been in and out of Waterloo half a dozen times recently and that train has been an almost permanent feature, at the current length.  The line it is on is within the possession until well beyond the point of impact.

It can be seen present, (either with the cab just at the platform end, or just beyond) in a number of online images and videos taken at different times, e.g. this from 8th Aug by Paul Bigland: http://PaulBigland.zenfolio.com/p671909530/e92a8b12d

Paul


Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by ChrisB at 11:57, 15th August 2017
 
Causing horrendous problems getting into Waterloo from suburban stations now. A colleague's journey from Surbiton this morning kicked her out at Raynes Park, and eventually told to get a bus to Wimbledon & the tube from there. Expected at 0930, she's still on her way.

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by stuving at 12:00, 15th August 2017
 
Looking at the pictures, it seems a possibility that the engineering train was longer than was expected, or it had been moved, and that the passenger train then collided sidewise where the lines converge.
I've been in and out of Waterloo half a dozen times recently and that train has been an almost permanent feature, at the current length.  The line it is on is within the possession until well beyond the point of impact.

It can be seen present, (either with the cab just at the platform end, or just beyond) in a number of online images and videos taken at different times, e.g. this from 8th Aug by Paul Bigland: http://PaulBigland.zenfolio.com/p671909530/e92a8b12d

Paul



But the engineering train shouldn't affect the signalling, should it? All track within the possession should be off limits, - I'm not sure whether that would involve screwdrivers and crocodile leads these days, but the effect should be the same. The issues concerns the boundary - all track entering the possession should appear "occupied" permanently, and be marked by sticky tape on the panel (or its soft equivalent on-screen).

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by paul7575 at 12:22, 15th August 2017
 
But the engineering train shouldn't affect the signalling, should it? All track within the possession should be off limits, - I'm not sure whether that would involve screwdrivers and crocodile leads these days, but the effect should be the same. The issues concerns the boundary - all track entering the possession should appear "occupied" permanently, and be marked by sticky tape on the panel (or its soft equivalent on-screen).

Quite right AFAIK, but my post was only intended to explain to the earlier poster that that particular engineering train shouldn't have caught anyone out, because this morning it appears to be not significantly different, in either length or position, to any other day.

Paul

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by Timmer at 14:37, 15th August 2017
 
SWT are now advising not to travel on their network tomorrow as well as the rest of today:
https://www.southwesttrains.co.uk/disruptions/96AF36FED17149D9BF98F22568F054DC/

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by Oxonhutch at 15:32, 15th August 2017
 
It will be interesting what the RAIB come up with as the underlying cause but the barrier train did exactly what it was supposed to do and probably prevented deaths or serious injuries on the ground in the work site. Good use of belt and braces against, what I can only presume, was a perceived risk of incursion - or, more likely, worker excursion.

Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Posted by CyclingSid at 18:20, 15th August 2017
 
On the re-direct to Reading; last Saturday I went to Salisbury and found there was a direct train from Reading (P3).Very convenient. On the way back, it appeared that the train sat at Basingstoke for 30 minutes or so, presumably to allow the normal BSK-RDG and XTC services to maintain their timetable. Apparently there were positive comments from RDG passsengers, plus "you should bring back the Brighton service" (how long ago?).

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by PhilWakely at 21:29, 15th August 2017
 
From my very untrained eye, it looks to me that a set of points leading away from the platform from which the EMU was leaving had somehow been set so that the EMU went into the path of the engineering train
: photo from BBC report

The points must have somehow been set between the time the EMU entered the platform and left it.

Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Posted by Timmer at 05:56, 16th August 2017
 
Good news is that platforms 11 and 12 are back in use with just platform 13 closed.

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by paul7575 at 10:18, 16th August 2017
 
Good news is that platforms 11 and 12 are back in use with just platform 13 closed.

That looks like some evidence of their having been two issues (as was reported on SWT's website yesterday morning), perhaps the points giving access to P13 from the P14 approach track are a separate fault?  P13 is now showing NOGO on the opentraintimes map, and as you say P11 and P12 are seeing normal movements via yesterdays main incident site.

http://www.opentraintimes.com/maps/signalling/wat

Paul

Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Posted by Timmer at 10:59, 16th August 2017
 
That looks like some evidence of their having been two issues (as was reported on SWT's website yesterday morning), perhaps the points giving access to P13 from the P14 approach track are a separate fault?  P13 is now showing NOGO on the opentraintimes map, and as you say P11 and P12 are seeing normal movements via yesterdays main incident site.

http://www.opentraintimes.com/maps/signalling/wat

Paul
Which is a bit of a shame that the advice given was not to travel today. I know with what was known at the time it was the best advice to give, but how many didn't make their journey today based on that advice? In the case of those who have to travel to work probably not many. Perhaps those who were planning a day out to London may have postponed doing so.

Slightly sad that the last days of the SWT franchise will be remembered for the blockade at Waterloo that will benefit the new franchise and not all the many good things that SWT have achieved over the years. Not saying they were perfect but it has been one of the better franchises.

Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Posted by IndustryInsider at 11:16, 16th August 2017
 
Slightly sad that the last days of the SWT franchise will be remembered for the blockade at Waterloo that will benefit the new franchise and not all the many good things that SWT have achieved over the years. Not saying they were perfect but it has been one of the better franchises.

I'm guessing you're not a member of the South Hampshire Rail User Group then?   

First Group must be relieved it didn't happen just after they'd taken over, as that would no doubt have been a difficult start from which to recover.

Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Posted by stuving at 11:31, 16th August 2017
 
Slightly sad that the last days of the SWT franchise will be remembered for the blockade at Waterloo that will benefit the new franchise and not all the many good things that SWT have achieved over the years. Not saying they were perfect but it has been one of the better franchises.

I'm guessing you're not a member of the South Hampshire Rail User Group then?   

First Group must be relieved it didn't happen just after they'd taken over, as that would no doubt have been a difficult start from which to recover.

How do you know it won't have?

Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Posted by Timmer at 11:43, 16th August 2017
 
I'm guessing you're not a member of the South Hampshire Rail User Group then?   
LOL Nope

Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Posted by paul7575 at 12:04, 16th August 2017
 
I guess SHRUG will be wound down now, because he's been pushing the line that everything that ever goes wrong is down to SWT for years now. 

(I always assume there are very few members of SHRUG - and they don't deserve the coverage  they get.)

Obviously everything will be perfect again from Sunday, just like it was under BR...

Paul

Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Posted by ChrisB at 13:00, 16th August 2017
 
Further points failures affecting Pl 13....

Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Posted by IndustryInsider at 13:08, 16th August 2017
 
I guess SHRUG will be wound down now, because he's been pushing the line that everything that ever goes wrong is down to SWT for years now. 

(I always assume there are very few members of SHRUG - and they don't deserve the coverage  they get.)

Obviously everything will be perfect again from Sunday, just like it was under BR...

Their website, whilst being triumphant about the change, does state that it will take a while for First to unravel the years of bad work from Stagecoach.  I would expect, if it does continue, that positive news will actually get a mention and any negative news will be either not mentioned or they will claim it only happened because of the poor legacy left by Stagecoach.

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by paul7575 at 15:48, 16th August 2017
 
Further points failures affecting Pl 13....
To the best of my knowledge that has been the case all day, hence my earlier post. 

Looking at the track diagram, I suspect that if the "double slip (diamond) crossing", (which was the scene of yesterdays incident), is still defective, and it was secured in the 'normal' position for access into P11 and P12, then it would prevent use of P13.

Maybe one of our signalling gurus would like to offer a better opinion?

Paul

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by eightf48544 at 16:21, 16th August 2017
 
What ever happened to clipping, scotching and padlocking points in such circumstances?

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by IndustryInsider at 16:54, 16th August 2017
 
What ever happened to clipping, scotching and padlocking points in such circumstances?

I think that's what Paul meant by securing the points in the 'normal' position.

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by paul7575 at 17:31, 16th August 2017
 
What ever happened to clipping, scotching and padlocking points in such circumstances?

I think that's what Paul meant by securing the points in the 'normal' position.
Yes - that's what I intended.   I'm sure the RAIB report will be interesting in due course.

Paul

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by stuving at 18:25, 16th August 2017
 
SWT's excuses page has this:
What's Going On:
A reoccurred points failure affecting platforms 11 and 12, an earlier points failure affecting trains using platforms 20 to 24 at London Waterloo and a low-speed partial derailment yesterday has caused disruption to services. Points are sections of track that allow trains to change from one line to another.

Trains are now able to use platforms 11 and 12 at London Waterloo after engineers investigated a problem with a set of points.

Trains are still unable to use platform 13 at London Waterloo for the remainder of the day following the derailment yesterday. Engineers will continue to make repairs today and overnight tonight so that this platform can be brought back into use.

That appears to say the the "unrelated" points failure yesterday was at the other side (though I can't see any trains that were affected), while this P11-13 issue has happened before. (Could that be what happened last week?) 

It gives the impression that work has been going on at the entrance to P13, though that seems a bit unlikely. More like sitting thinking and planning what to do later? Whether what needs mending at or near that crossing was the cause of the derailment, its result, or due to the rerailing operations is unclear, and may not be 100% clear to those on site.

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by stuving at 18:38, 16th August 2017
 
It was obvious in an earlier post that I didn't know what technology was involved in signalling at Waterloo, more specifically in the interlocking which is what seems to have failed yesterday. The blurb about this upgrade programme said control was going to Basingstoke ROC, and even that this would be done starting last year. Yet the Sectional Appendix (June 2017) still says Wimbledon SC. That would still count as remote, I imagine, but what is it?

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by SandTEngineer at 19:10, 16th August 2017
 
Waterloo is a 1990 relay interlocking controlled from Wimbledon SCC by duplicated Time Division Multiplex (TDM) remote control and indication systems.  The interlocking is divided into 'Main Line' and 'Windsor' sides and each half is controlled by separate panels at Wimbledon.

I am aware of the possible cause of the incident and rest assured the RAIB report will be very interesting reading.......

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by SandTEngineer at 19:14, 16th August 2017
 

Looking at the track diagram, I suspect that if the "double slip (diamond) crossing", (which was the scene of yesterdays incident), is still defective, and it was secured in the 'normal' position for access into P11 and P12, then it would prevent use of P13.

Maybe one of our signalling gurus would like to offer a better opinion?

Paul
Yes Paul, although I don't know the exact reason, its quite likely that that is the cause as the only route to Platform No.13 passes through those points whereas all other (functional) platforms have alternative routes to/from them.

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by IndustryInsider at 19:45, 16th August 2017
 
Do we know whether the derailment has caused any delays to the programme of works being undertaken?

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by paul7575 at 21:21, 16th August 2017
 
Do we know whether the derailment has caused any delays to the programme of works being undertaken?

I think if anything the civils work is progressing anyway.  Someone suggested in another forum any knock on effects will more likely be to the stage work on the signalling alterations.

I was looking at various webcam pics over the last few days and (at least to my eye) the platforms and track alterations seem on the home straight now; I think they are about to start the top surfaces of the 3 modified islands.

Paul

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by paul7575 at 21:33, 16th August 2017
 
Waterloo is a 1990 relay interlocking controlled from Wimbledon SCC by duplicated Time Division Multiplex (TDM) remote control and indication systems.  The interlocking is divided into 'Main Line' and 'Windsor' sides and each half is controlled by separate panels at Wimbledon.

Yes, I've seen the way the panels are currently split, and it suggests an interesting medium term problem because the station and approaches effectively operate now with a split down the middle, with the main line (fast and slow) side covering P1-14, and the Windsor side panel covering the rest including P20-24, and the two signalling diagrams only have limited overlapping information.   

However, in the post Dec 2018 set up, the mainline side spreads out from P1 as far as P18 - with the main suburban apparently having P1-6, and the longer distance trains P7-18.   The Windsor side services will use the same split of approach tracks through Vauxhall, but their trains will only normally use P19-24. 

IIRC this sort of horizontal split runs all the way through to Clapham Junction - which as most people know doesn't really operate as a junction, more of a 'coming together'... 

Sounds like they might need some significant changes to the signallers MMI...

Paul

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by SandTEngineer at 21:47, 16th August 2017
 
IIRC this sort of horizontal split runs all the way through to Clapham Junction - which as most people know doesn't really operate as a junction, more of a 'coming together'... 

Sounds like they might need some significant changes to the signallers MMI...

Paul
Yes, the split continues through Clapham Junction to Earlsfield on the Mains and to Putney on the Windsors.  There is a seperate 'Yard Shunters Panel' at Clapham Junction that interfaces to both Wimbledon panels and to signal a train, for example, from the Mains, through the Yard, and back out to the Windsors requires some complex electrical controls and the co-operation of the three signallers!  I know this because I was Project Engineer for the design team back in 1989-1992

I would guess that when the reconfiguration of the control centre to VDUs comes on stream that it will be easier to implement a different split.

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by Timmer at 07:59, 17th August 2017
 
Platform 13 remains out of use again today so would appear they couldn't fix the problem overnight.

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by SandTEngineer at 08:30, 17th August 2017
 
On the WNXX Forum it was mentioned that the derailed train (once rerailed) was stabled in Platform No.13 so perhaps its still there?

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by Gordon the Blue Engine at 08:41, 17th August 2017
 
I wonder whether perhaps the points were set wrong when the inward working entered P13 some 20 minutes earlier.  This “trailing” of the points would not of course have caused a derailment, but would have damaged them and could have lead to the 0540 outward working derailing when passing over them. 

Partial/complete replacement of the moving bits of the points may be necessary, which they may have decided to postpone for now.

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by paul7575 at 09:39, 17th August 2017
 
On the WNXX Forum it was mentioned that the derailed train (once rerailed) was stabled in Platform No.13 so perhaps its still there?
I believe it ran to Clapham Yard yesterday morning about 0815, 5Z50 was the train ID mentioned elsewhere. I think I saw it in P11 on the opentraintimes map beforehand but cannot be sure.

Paul

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by paul7575 at 11:06, 17th August 2017
 
I wonder whether perhaps the points were set wrong when the inward working entered P13 some 20 minutes earlier.  This “trailing” of the points would not of course have caused a derailment, but would have damaged them and could have lead to the 0540 outward working derailing when passing over them. 
Not sure about this 'inward working to P13'?  The incident train was leaving P11, there have been various images online showing the majority of the train still in P11 after the event.  Another unit was trapped in P12 after the incident, and P13 was inaccessible, but IIRC empty at the time.

This Guardian article shows the aftermath, the barrier train being in the P10 approach:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/aug/16/rail-passengers-second-day-delays-waterloo-derailment

Paul 

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by bradshaw at 11:07, 17th August 2017
 

from the SWT journey check

Following a low-speed partial derailment on Tuesday, we are unable to use platform 13 at London Waterloo. Engineers attempted repairs overnight but were unable to complete them without causing significant disruption to morning services. As a result, the work to bring the platform back into use will take place overnight on Thursday 17 August.

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by paul7575 at 11:40, 17th August 2017
 

from the SWT journey check

Following a low-speed partial derailment on Tuesday, we are unable to use platform 13 at London Waterloo. Engineers attempted repairs overnight but were unable to complete them without causing significant disruption to morning services. As a result, the work to bring the platform back into use will take place overnight on Thursday 17 August.

That's just as you'd expect, (as post #47) - hence P11 and P12 are in use, (trains in there as I write) which indicates that the affected crossing is presently out of action and must be locked in position for 'straight across' moves from P11 or P12 towards the Up Main Relief.

It doesn't mean the original incident concerned trains entering or leaving P13 at all.

Paul

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by Gordon the Blue Engine at 14:20, 17th August 2017
 
I wonder whether perhaps the points were set wrong when the inward working entered P13 some 20 minutes earlier.  This “trailing” of the points would not of course have caused a derailment, but would have damaged them and could have lead to the 0540 outward working derailing when passing over them. 
Not sure about this 'inward working to P13'?  The incident train was leaving P11, there have been various images online showing the majority of the train still in P11 after the event.  Another unit was trapped in P12 after the incident, and P13 was inaccessible, but IIRC empty at the time.

This Guardian article shows the aftermath, the barrier train being in the P10 approach:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/aug/16/rail-passengers-second-day-delays-waterloo-derailment

Paul 

Sorry, my mistake, I should have said P11 not P13.

...[later]  and RTT shows the train in P12 arrived after the train in P11, so that's my theory blown out of the water!

Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Posted by paul7575 at 17:19, 17th August 2017
 

Sorry, my mistake, I should have said P11 not P13.

...[later]  and RTT shows the train in P12 arrived after the train in P11, so that's my theory blown out of the water!


No problem.  We are back on the same song sheet again...   

Paul...

 
The Coffee Shop forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western). The views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit https://www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site at admin@railcustomer.info if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules. Our full legal statment is at https://www.greatwesternrailway.info/legal.html

Although we are planning ahead, we don't know what the future will bring here in the Coffee Shop. We have domains "firstgreatwestern.info" for w-a-y back and also "greatwesternrailway.info"; we can also answer to "greatbritishrailways.info" too. For the future, information about Great Brisish Railways, by customers and for customers.
 
Current Running
GWR trains from JourneyCheck
 
 
Code Updated 11th January 2025