This is a test of GDPR / Cookie Acceptance [about our cookies]
Really irritating test - cookie expires in 24 hour!
Great Western Coffee Shop
23.7.2025 (Wednesday) 08:05 - All running AOK
Recent Public Posts - [guest]
Re: Bus Service 205
In "Transport for London" [363488/30357/46]
Posted by grahame at 07:45, 23rd July 2025
 
We have decided to change the 30 and 205 bus routes because there is no economic or environmental reason to run more buses than is required at the busiest time of day, location and direction. Usage of both has markedly reduced since the pandemic

•Weekday usage on route 30 has decreased by 25% weekdays, 13% on Saturdays and by 13% on Sundays
•Weekday usage on route 205 has decreased by 19% weekdays, 15% on Saturdays and by 12% on Sundays

Couldn't they have just reduced the frequency of both buses without changing the routes?

I noted that they make no comment about the social or passenger needs in the reasons they gave for making the change.  Purely listing cost (to them) and environment (greenwash is always a good pleaser that people won't argue against.

Yes - I do hear the overcapacity issue on the Paddington to Baker Street (quite short compared to the whole route) section. That's the way things work - routes often have busy middle sections and quite outer ends BUT if you cut the outer ends, you damage the economic case that they make for the middle section too. Classic examples are city centre to residential services where you trim the branches back and damage the core / trunk in the process.

Isn't it interesting too that they have halved the service from Paddington to Baker Street as I understand it - a 50% cut, even though traffic is only down 12% to 25%.  I would caution, though, about reducing frequencies.  The 205 need(ed) a reasonable frequency as a turn-up-and-go for people who may be arriving into Paddington or St Pancras late and are going to get angst with a long wait.

In my view,  the changes were a poor decision with little or no regard to the social changes, and perhaps someone or some organisation had noticed that getting people to use the underground / cross rail alternatives would bring in more income for TfL that bus fares / passes from people out of town?

I came through London (Paddington) on Sunday on my way to Liverpool Street.  No 205, and not tempted to change along the way with two rather than one waits for buses, and with a heavy pack. Took the Elizabeth Line, noting long queues for the lifts at Paddington and the one at Liverpool Street on the way up to the main station out of order.  Me thinks the inter station bus service has been culled without an adequate alternative for the less-than-athletic being provided.

Re: The next adventure ... and a comparison between passenger experiences
In "Introductions and chat" [363487/30476/1]
Posted by grahame at 06:55, 23rd July 2025
Already liked by PrestburyRoad, GBM, eightonedee
 
The schedule was the 08:29 from Odense to Copenhagen (Kastrup) Airport, change (10:12 to 10:30)  onto the train to Gothenburg there to arrive at 14:20, change (14:20 to 15:29) on the train to Orebro that arrived there at 18:19.

Not how it worked out.  I left my hotel at 08:00 and caught a late running train at around 08:15 into Copenhagen (Central).  A state of some chaos there and rather than wait for my train to reverse and carry on to Kastrup, I decided to have what turned out to be a very short look around - a platform change onto the train to Gothenburg scheduled an hour earlier, which left atound 20 minutes late but made up time and go to Gothenburg at 13:20.   No need to wait for the planned onward train to Orebro - there was one leaving a couple of platforms away at 13:29 and another quick change and on our way - due into Orebro ay 16:19 - a full two hours gained. 

All good stories that there not-so-wonderful parts.  The 13:29 to Orebro train failed and we crawled into the station at Aspen (no, not THAT Aspen) where we sat for a while.   Then we moved on to Floda where we went onto a side platform and also sat for a while.  Trains are computerised these days, and just like a laptop that's giving problems, rebooting does wonders and the train was gotten working again - though (translated for me by a couple of rail staff using it to get to their shifts) it had to then proceed at reduced speed. And we also had to wait in another station for the Stockholm Express to get past. We arrive in Orebro about 45 minutes late, at  17:05 - or 75 minutes early on my schedule.  Which gave me an extra hour to look around the town, the 7th largest in Sweden, but that's the next story.

Re: 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury
In "TransWilts line" [363486/29726/18]
Posted by grahame at 06:09, 23rd July 2025
 
06:35 Salisbury to Worcester Foregate Street due 09:47

Facilities on the 06:35 Salisbury to Worcester Foregate Street due 09:47.
This is due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time.
Will be formed of 3 coaches instead of 2.

Further Information

If you arrive at your destination 15 or more minutes late because your GWR train was delayed or cancelled, you can claim Delay Repay compensation. Please keep your ticket and visit GWR.com/DelayRepay
Last Updated:23/07/2025 05:04

Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2025
In "Across the West" [363485/29650/26]
Posted by a-driver at 20:53, 22nd July 2025
 
Consistency being maintained.....

Delays to services between London Paddington and Reading

Following a broken down train at Twyford some lines will be reopened shortly. Disruption is expected until 17:15 22/07.

Train services between London Paddington and Reading may be delayed by up to 15 minutes.

Broken down freight train.

Re: Inverness to Kyle of Lochalsh rail line closed after tracks flooded - 22/7/2025
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [363484/30481/51]
Posted by ChrisB at 20:45, 22nd July 2025
 
Lines reopen in the morning

Re: Bus Service 205
In "Transport for London" [363483/30357/46]
Posted by Surrey 455 at 20:25, 22nd July 2025
 
We have decided to change the 30 and 205 bus routes because there is no economic or environmental reason to run more buses than is required at the busiest time of day, location and direction. Usage of both has markedly reduced since the pandemic

•Weekday usage on route 30 has decreased by 25% weekdays, 13% on Saturdays and by 13% on Sundays
•Weekday usage on route 205 has decreased by 19% weekdays, 15% on Saturdays and by 12% on Sundays

Couldn't they have just reduced the frequency of both buses without changing the routes?

Re: Severn Valley Railway - heritage line, Worcestershire and Shropshire - merged posts
In "Heritage railways, Railtours, buses, canals, steamships and other public transport based attractions" [363482/6572/47]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 20:04, 22nd July 2025
 
From the BBC:

Timelapse shows heritage railway track repairs

Timelapse footage has been released showing engineers completing repairs on a section of track after a landslip closed a heritage railway line.

The Severn Valley Railway, which runs for 16 miles (26km) from Kidderminster, Worcestershire, to Bridgnorth, Shropshire, suffered a landslip in January.

It meant trains could only run to Hampton Loade, cutting out the Bridgnorth section of the line.

On Friday, the line will officially reopen as the famous Flying Scotsman locomotive steams into Bridgnorth.


Re: Bristol Airport - proposals for expansion and bus services - merged posts
In "Buses and other ways to travel" [363481/22894/5]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 19:31, 22nd July 2025
 
From the BBC:

Airport's new £60m transport hub officially opens


The new facility was officially opened by airport CEO Dave Lees (left), MP Sadik Al-Hassan (centre) and council leader Mike Bell (right)

A new £60m transport interchange has been officially opened at Bristol Airport.

The facility, one of the largest of its kind in the region, can hold an extra 2,000 parking spaces, as well as significantly expanding the number of bus and coach spaces. It will also home the airport's new "drop and go" zone and offer better pedestrian links to the terminal.

Dave Lees, chief executive of the Airport, said the new development was "really important as it represents a milestone in terms of improving the facilities for our customers". "Gone are the days of passengers having to walk up slopes here," he added, explaining that the number of bays for coaches and buses had been doubled, as well as the addition of new covered access routes, covered seating and toilet facilities. This signifies the airport's "level of ambition" as it "looks to the future", he added.

The project has taken more than two years to complete, and is part of a wider £400m "airport transformation programme" to improve transport links. Currently only about 15% of airport customers arrive at the site by bus.

North Somerset Council leader Mile Bell said the new facility was a "fantastic new piece of infrastructure" for customers but stressed that there was still work to be done. "I think we all recognise that we've still got more to do to make the access routes easier and introduce mass transit, particularly from Bristol city centre so people can get here easier, faster and cheaper using public transport," he said. Meanwhile, he added, passengers should "give public transport a try" and avoid antisocial parking in local communities around the airport.

His comments were echoed by North Somerset MP Sadik Al-Hassan, who also called for a mass transit to the airport and urged any further expansion of the airport to be "balanced with the views of the community". Telling the BBC there were "swings and roundabouts" with any airport expansion, he said: "This is allowing more people to come here by sustainable means, so I'm hoping it will help. but it's part of what needs to be a larger plan to look at how the airport sits within the wider economic area."


Inverness to Kyle of Lochalsh rail line closed after tracks flooded - 22/7/2025
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [363480/30481/51]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 18:19, 22nd July 2025
 
From the BBC:



Train services on a Highland rail line have been cancelled after the tracks were submerged by flood water.

Silt was washed onto the line at Achanalt, east of Achnasheen in Wester Ross, during heavy rainfall overnight.

ScotRail said all services between Inverness and Kyle of Lochalsh had been suspended.

Replacement bus services have been arranged and train tickets are being accepted on Stagecoach North bus services between Inverness and Dingwall and CityLink buses between Inverness and Kyle of Lochalsh.

There was also flooding reported at Garve, on the same line.

Met Office weather warnings for rain were in force across the region on Monday and overnight until 06:00.

Engineers arrived at Achanalt on Tuesday morning to carry out inspections.

Network Rail said they had a team on site to clear the debris and inspect the track and level crossing. "Floodwater has subsided, but the debris it's brought with it is blocking the track and the station area," it said in a statement.

ScotRail said they would provide an update on Wednesday's service later.

The rail company also closed part of the train line between Inverness and Aberdeen while repairs, which are now complete, were carried out on the track between Inverness Airport and Nairn.

Replacement buses were provided to take passengers from Aberdeen to Inverness and train tickets were accepted on Stagecoach buses while rail services were disrupted.


Re: Senior Railcard - ongoing issues, merged posts
In "Fare's Fair" [363479/26533/4]
Posted by Ralph Ayres at 17:47, 22nd July 2025
 

In practice it wont make any difference as the date on the railcard itself is correct. Just check the date on your renewed railcard/receipt is correct. As you probably know you'll need to fill in a new application form.

Presumably that's in case you've got younger in the intervening year and so no longer qualify for that Railcard?

Re: IEP seats in 2025
In "Across the West" [363478/29826/26]
Posted by 1st fan at 16:54, 22nd July 2025
 
I believe a new design of cushion is being considered/trialed for the 'quarter life' refurb that'll be coming up soon.  Worn ones are being replaced ad-hoc.  If you have a 'good' train manager if you mention it to them they can log that seat into the fault app.

I hope that refurb also includes proper buggy space provision and a redesigned bike space hook allowing for thicker rimmed bike wheels.  Normal USB and USB-C charging sockets would also be very useful - Chiltern's ongoing Class 168 refresh is featuring those.

Very good news if they are looking at seat cushion redesign. Don’t remember seeing the Train Manager actually.

Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2025
In "Across the West" [363477/29650/26]
Posted by TaplowGreen at 16:32, 22nd July 2025
 
Consistency being maintained.....

Delays to services between London Paddington and Reading

Following a broken down train at Twyford some lines will be reopened shortly. Disruption is expected until 17:15 22/07.

Train services between London Paddington and Reading may be delayed by up to 15 minutes.

Re: 'French infantry at Waterloo' - caption for an image
In "The Lighter Side" [363476/30479/30]
Posted by TonyK at 16:04, 22nd July 2025
Already liked by Oxonhutch, TaplowGreen, GBM, lympstone_commuter
 
C’est magnifique, mais ce n’est pas la gare.

(Apologies to Pierre Bosquet)


Never trust anything you read on the internet. 

         - Abraham Lincoln, 1808

Trains not calling at Crewkerne from 28 Jul 25
In "South Western services" [363475/30480/42]
Posted by bradshaw at 14:21, 22nd July 2025
 

Just appeared on SWR’s X site
From Monday 28 July, until further notice, trains will not call at Crewkerne due to temporary speed restriction.

A connecting bus service will run from Yeovil Junction to Axminster calling at Crewkerne.


More detail from their website

  We are experiencing some of the driest conditions for around 200 years, and in the Crewkerne area this has dried out and shrunk the clay soil embankments that support our tracks. This is a problem known as ‘soil moisture deficit’, which Network Rail explains here.

Because track levels have been disturbed, our trains cannot travel safely at their normal speeds, meaning we have to implement a 40mph speed restriction on four miles of track. Unfortunately, track levels cannot be restored to normal until ground conditions improve.

Why can’t trains call at Crewkerne?

If trains continue to call at Crewkerne it will create delays that will quickly spread along the West of England Line, leading to cancellations and large gaps between services.

As a result, we have had to make the difficult decision for trains not to call at Crewkerne.

When will trains call at Crewkerne again?

We will restore train services as soon as we possibly can, but until further notice, trains will not call at Crewkerne.

As hot and dry conditions are set to continue, we are warning customers that additional speed restrictions and further timetable changes are likely to be necessary west of Salisbury over the summer. We are carefully monitoring embankment and track conditions to understand when changes will be needed.

Re: The variety that is rail travel.
In "The Lighter Side" [363474/30464/30]
Posted by eightonedee at 13:50, 22nd July 2025
Already liked by grahame
 
Is the Molli Bahn station Heiligendamm?

Re: Bus Service 205
In "Transport for London" [363473/30357/46]
Posted by matth1j at 12:18, 22nd July 2025
 
we’re sorry to learn of the inconvenience this may cause to your journeys and those of the community you support.

... and wonder, if they are only learning of that now, how poor was the reach of their consultation or them taking note of the inputs it generated?
Hopefully you will give us Katie's reply to that question

Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2025
In "Across the West" [363472/29650/26]
Posted by a-driver at 11:49, 22nd July 2025
Already liked by Witham Bobby, Mark A, rogerw, PrestburyRoad, Oxonhutch
 
See also: https://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=30475.msg363433#msg363433 

CfN. 

Fair play to the SWR managers concerned for pitching up given the circumstances, it must have been quite uncomfortable for them. Would be good to see Hopwood et al at Paddington (or indeed anywhere!) doing a similar session during a GWR meltdown, seeing (and hearing) what their customers have to put up with at first hand may concentrate a few minds.........

I’d rather have the top brass from the DfT and Network Rail.  They’re the ones inflicting the misery.

Re: Bus Service 205
In "Transport for London" [363471/30357/46]
Posted by grahame at 11:15, 22nd July 2025
Already liked by matth1j, Worcester_Passenger, Mark A
 

I have dropped TfL a note asking for official advice ... let's see how / if they respond.

I am a repeated but not frequent use of bus service 205 from Paddington to St Pancras, interchanging from main line trains from Wiltshire where I live to onward services via Eurostar and also to places like Cambridge. I am also a passenger advocate advising others how best to travel and a number of us have mobility and sensory issues that mean we need to minimise interchanges, distance moved and level changes, even if lifts are provided.

I am disappointed to read that the through bus will no longer run from Paddington to Kings Cross as from a weeks time.  We heard this news late in the day as I understand that consultations have been with London residents - which we are not - we are visitors who together help make your city work and help you justify the public transport which is usually very good.

1. What consultation was done and reach put out to groups like ours who use London's services but don't live there?

2. Is there an alternative I have missed of direct surface provision that works without an extra interchange for those who find the underground difficult?

You say "no personal information" BUT you are very welcome to share my details and get back in touch as appropriate - indeed I encourage you to do so to help make systems / alternatives better and well known - Graham

Reply just received:

Ref: 21753394

22 July 2025

Dear Mr Ellis

Thank you for contacting us on 15 June regarding the recent changes to bus route 205. We truly appreciate hearing from passengers like yourself who not only use our services but also advocate for others, especially those with mobility and sensory needs.

We understand your disappointment at the withdrawal of the through service between Paddington and King’s Cross, and we’re sorry to learn of the inconvenience this may cause to your journeys and those of the community you support.

Your concerns have been shared with our Network Development Team, who have provided the following explanation.

We have decided to change the 30 and 205 bus routes because there is no economic or environmental reason to run more buses than is required at the busiest time of day, location and direction. Usage of both has markedly reduced since the pandemic

•Weekday usage on route 30 has decreased by 25% weekdays, 13% on Saturdays and by 13% on Sundays
•Weekday usage on route 205 has decreased by 19% weekdays, 15% on Saturdays and by 12% on Sundays
 
There is therefore excess capacity even at the busiest time on the combined corridor between Baker Street station and Paddington on routes 27 and 205, with six buses required to meet demand but twelve scheduled. We have a duty to make best use of public money and many competing objectives to fulfil with a limited budget. We have not cut frequencies on the City Road as part of this scheme.

It does mean that some journeys newly require the passenger to interchange or use a different route. All such trips can be made with one change of bus using same-stop interchange at stops that have facilities such as seating, lighting and shelter. We are also increasing frequency on route 27 at the busiest times. We also fairly newly have the wholly step-free Elizabeth line which parallels some of the route. The Circle and Hammersmith & City line have been upgraded as well between Paddington and Whitechapel. We have also invested in step free access at various stations along these lines such as Paddington, part of Euston Square, Kings Cross St Pancras, Moorgate, Liverpool Street and Whitechapel.

The consultation on this change ran between 21 October 2024 and 10 January 2025. A total of 1,359 responses were received of which 22 were from stakeholders, including MPs, parliamentary bodies, politicians, local authorities, statutory and advisory bodies, accessibility groups, community groups and charities, local business and user groups. Detail on all this can be found in the consultation report can be found herehttps://haveyoursay.tfl.gov.uk/30-205-bus-proposals

Thanks again for contacting us. If there is anything else we can help you with, please reply to this email. Alternatively, you can call us on 0343 222 1234 and we'll be happy to help you.

Kind regards

Katie Childs
Customer Service Adviser
Transport for London Customer Services

I note ...

we’re sorry to learn of the inconvenience this may cause to your journeys and those of the community you support.

... and wonder, if they are only learning of that now, how poor was the reach of their consultation or them taking note of the inputs it generated?

Re: Fifteen hurt after double-decker bus hits bridge - Eccles, Manchester, 21/7/2025
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [363470/30478/51]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 11:13, 22nd July 2025
 
An update, from the BBC:

Bus driver arrested after 20 injured in bridge crash

The driver of a double-decker bus that crashed into a canal bridge injuring 20 people, including three who were seriously hurt, has been arrested.

A passenger was thrown from the top deck when the vehicle's roof was torn off as it struck the Bridgewater Canal Aqueduct on Barton Lane in Eccles, Salford on Monday, Greater Manchester Police (GMP) said.

The force said a 19-year-old woman, and two men, one aged in his 20s and another in his 40s, sustained serious injuries and remain in hospital in a stable condition.

The driver, a man in his 50s, was arrested on suspicion of causing serious injury by careless driving and has been bailed pending further enquiries.

Police said 17 other people were also treated at the scene for injuries that were "non-life threatening or life-changing".

Barton Lane has since been reopened, and Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM) said it has launched an "immediate and urgent" investigation into the circumstances of the crash. This includes why the 100 service bus was "not taking its usual route", a TFGM spokesman said.



Police said there are height restriction warnings in place by the bridge, including hanging chains and signs.

Transport Commissioner for Greater Manchester Vernon Everitt said: "We are working closely with the investigation team at Greater Manchester Police and the bus operator, Stagecoach. This is clearly a distressing situation for everyone involved and we'd like to thank emergency services for their swift response."

The road was closed into Monday evening with diversions in place as authorities worked to move the damaged bus.



Labour MP for Worsley and Eccles Michael Wheeler said the crash was "unacceptable".  "It's not the first time this has happened, so after understanding what's happened we need to do everything we can to make sure it doesn't happen again," he told BBC Radio Manchester.

A bus has previously had its roof ripped off after striking the same bridge in April 2023.


Re: IEP seats in 2025
In "Across the West" [363469/29826/26]
Posted by IndustryInsider at 10:31, 22nd July 2025
Already liked by PrestburyRoad, Witham Bobby, Mark A, 1st fan, Timmer
 
I believe a new design of cushion is being considered/trialed for the 'quarter life' refurb that'll be coming up soon.  Worn ones are being replaced ad-hoc.  If you have a 'good' train manager if you mention it to them they can log that seat into the fault app.

I hope that refurb also includes proper buggy space provision and a redesigned bike space hook allowing for thicker rimmed bike wheels.  Normal USB and USB-C charging sockets would also be very useful - Chiltern's ongoing Class 168 refresh is featuring those.

Re: Fifteen hurt after double-decker bus hits bridge - Eccles, Manchester, 21/7/2025
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [363468/30478/51]
Posted by matth1j at 09:24, 22nd July 2025
 
Telegraph report has video, with a warning that some may find it distressing:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/gift/d8f0daef75f202c5
('gifted' link, non-subscribers should be able to view I believe)

Re: Timetable colours
In "The Lighter Side" [363467/30471/30]
Posted by matth1j at 09:18, 22nd July 2025
 
Am I correct in thinking that this forum is predominantly male?Not sure why nature has decided that one in 12 males should suffer from the condition,
Off the top of my head... (ok from Gemini)

The reason more males than females are color blind is primarily due to genetics, specifically how the genes for color vision are inherited on the X chromosome. This is known as X-linked recessive inheritance.

Here's a breakdown:

Chromosomes and Sex Determination:

Females typically have two X chromosomes (XX).

Males typically have one X and one Y chromosome (XY).

The genes responsible for the most common types of color blindness (red-green color blindness) are located on the X chromosome.

Recessive Trait: Color blindness is caused by a recessive gene. This means that a person needs to inherit two copies of the faulty gene (one from each parent) for the trait to be expressed, unless they only have one X chromosome.

Why Males are More Affected:

Males have only one X chromosome. If that single X chromosome carries the faulty gene for color vision, they will be color blind because there's no second X chromosome to provide a healthy, dominant gene to compensate.

Females have two X chromosomes. If a female inherits one X chromosome with the faulty gene, her other X chromosome usually carries a normal, dominant gene that can compensate, allowing her to have normal color vision. In this case, she is a "carrier" and can pass the gene on to her children, but she is not color blind herself. For a female to be color blind, she would need to inherit a faulty gene on both of her X chromosomes, which is much less likely.


In summary:

Males: 1 in 12 are affected by red-green color blindness.

Females: Only about 1 in 200 are affected by red-green color blindness.

This significant difference highlights the impact of X-linked inheritance on the prevalence of color blindness between the sexes.

Re: Fifteen hurt after double-decker bus hits bridge - Eccles, Manchester, 21/7/2025
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [363466/30478/51]
Posted by Mark A at 08:21, 22nd July 2025
 
That's the aqueduct carrying the Bridgwater Canal, fairly adjacent to the swing span across the Manchester Ship Canal, the driver appears to have passed very prominent placemaking cues and also an overhead structure from which hang a set of jangly chains intended to warn people in overheight vehicles, in this case apparently to no effect.

Mark

Re: London Waterloo 21/07/25 DO NOT TRAVEL
In "South Western services" [363465/30475/42]
Posted by Timmer at 07:21, 22nd July 2025
 
Looks like things are operating normally into Waterloo this morning which is good news. Let’s hope they really have found the fault this time and that it doesn’t happen again.

Re: Timetable colours
In "The Lighter Side" [363464/30471/30]
Posted by grahame at 07:17, 22nd July 2025
 
Am I correct in thinking that this forum is predominantly male?

Yes ... we're aware that our balance in this and other aspects differs from both the general population and from rail users.

Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2025
In "London to the Cotswolds" [363463/29711/14]
Posted by Worcester_Passenger at 06:59, 22nd July 2025
 
Tuesday July 22

11:52 London Paddington to Hereford due 14:44 will be started from Worcester Shrub Hill.
This is due to a shortage of train crew.
Last Updated:22/07/2025 03:43

Later (09:30) : this has disappeared from JourneyCheck (though it doesn't merit a "reinstated" listing).

Re: IEP seats in 2025
In "Across the West" [363462/29826/26]
Posted by infoman at 06:11, 22nd July 2025
 
You learn some thing new every day,

never gave it a though that window seats suffer from wear more than aisle seats.

I know that HST seats were easily removed and could have been swapped over,

although there was no need because they were spring loaded.

Not sure if when IET's are going for a major service,the seats could be swapped over to even out the wear,

or the alternative is to swap the seats over your self,although not sure how easy they are to swap over.

Re: 'French infantry at Waterloo' - caption for an image
In "The Lighter Side" [363461/30479/30]
Posted by infoman at 05:54, 22nd July 2025
 
The film Waterloo must be the only blockbuster film that I know,

 that does not come with sub-titles,

even if shown on terrestrial TV.

Please correct me if you have a DVD copy of the film that does have sub-titles.

Surprised considering it was an early 1970's film

Re: Timetable colours
In "The Lighter Side" [363460/30471/30]
Posted by infoman at 05:49, 22nd July 2025
 
Am I correct in thinking that this forum is predominantly male?

regarding the colour blindness condition.

Only one in 200 females suffer from the condition 

Not sure why nature has decided that one in 12 males should suffer from the condition,

thankfully I am not one of them.

Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2025
In "Across the West" [363459/29650/26]
Posted by TaplowGreen at 05:38, 22nd July 2025
 
See also: https://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=30475.msg363433#msg363433 

CfN. 

Fair play to the SWR managers concerned for pitching up given the circumstances, it must have been quite uncomfortable for them. Would be good to see Hopwood et al at Paddington (or indeed anywhere!) doing a similar session during a GWR meltdown, seeing (and hearing) what their customers have to put up with at first hand may concentrate a few minds.........

 
The Coffee Shop forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western). The views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit https://www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site at admin@railcustomer.info if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules. Our full legal statment is at https://www.greatwesternrailway.info/legal.html

Although we are planning ahead, we don't know what the future will bring here in the Coffee Shop. We have domains "firstgreatwestern.info" for w-a-y back and also "greatwesternrailway.info"; we can also answer to "greatbritishrailways.info" too. For the future, information about Great Brisish Railways, by customers and for customers.
 
Current Running
GWR trains from JourneyCheck
 
 
Code Updated 11th January 2025