Cross country - Long Distance, or providing full line service?

broadgage

Transport Scholar
Hero Member

Posts: 5415

Re: Cross country - Long Distance, or providing full line service?

« Reply #30 on: July 04, 2018, 17:31:42 »

I voted for option 4, alternate services serving all major stations and main interchanges only.

However I agree strongly with those who state that the lack of capacity is by far the greatest problem, full length trains are needed before any tinkering with calling patterns.
And yes LONGER trains, NOT squeezing a few more seats into the existing trains.

Fixed formation at least 8 car, with provision for lengthening to at least 10 car. NOT flexible length. Whilst I don't think much of voyagers, I cant support scrapping them, they should be retained for lightly used services.


	Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU^▸ is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.

Adelante_CCT

Transport Scholar
Hero Member

Posts: 1314

Re: Cross country - Long Distance, or providing full line service?

« Reply #31 on: July 04, 2018, 18:09:31 »

Nothing about full length buffets broadgage? Shocked

I agree, capacity is the number one issue before anything else.

Being a little picky though, and actually a disadvantage to longer train lengths is the situation at Reading. With full length crossrail trains, services are more restricted for the use of common platforms 13 & 14 whilst anything longer than a 5 car voyager rules out the other common Platform 3, which is the perfect platform for XC^▸ services at the moment and therefore would make that platform pretty much redundant. More careful planning will be required.


	Logged

JayMac

Data Manager
Hero Member

Posts: 18925

Re: Cross country - Long Distance, or providing full line service?

« Reply #32 on: July 04, 2018, 18:22:44 »

Alternate longer trains call Didcot and skip Reading? Tongue


	Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.

grahame

Administrator
Hero Member

Posts: 40850

Re: Cross country - Long Distance, or providing full line service?

« Reply #33 on: July 04, 2018, 18:43:23 »

Quote from: bignosemac on July 04, 2018, 18:22:44

Alternate longer trains call Didcot and skip Reading? Tongue

And carry on to Poole which along with Middlesborough, Liverpool, Swindon, Hull, Bradford, Northampton, Norwich , Sunderland and Preston is one of the ten largest urban connurbations outside the South East which is not served by Cross Country.


	Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep

Adelante_CCT

Transport Scholar
Hero Member

Posts: 1314

Re: Cross country - Long Distance, or providing full line service?

« Reply #34 on: July 04, 2018, 19:01:10 »

Quote from: grahame on July 04, 2018, 18:43:23

Quote from: bignosemac on July 04, 2018, 18:22:44

Alternate longer trains call Didcot and skip Reading? Tongue

Why not just skip Didcot, Reading and go beyond Poole to Weymouth, calling at Swindon and Melksham along the way Wink


	Logged

didcotdean

Transport Scholar
Hero Member

Posts: 1425

Re: Cross country - Long Distance, or providing full line service?

« Reply #35 on: July 04, 2018, 23:25:24 »

I can remember going from Weymouth to Leicester without changing one summer Saturday in the mid 1980s, avoiding Reading, going via Bedworth.


	Logged

Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

Pages: 1 2 [3]

« previous next »