Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 12:35 06 May 2024
- Fans line streets for Ipswich Town parade
- Starliner: Nasa to fly new craft to space station
- Train strikes: How May's disruption affects you
- Families' station safety plea as third woman hit
- Eurotunnel says no queues with new travel system
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 18/05/24 - BRTA Westbury
22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber

On this day
6th May (1994)
Channel Tunnel opened (link)

Train RunningCancelled
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:52 London Paddington to Hereford
12:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
13:49 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
13:50 London Paddington to Great Malvern
13:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
14:01 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:18 Hereford to London Paddington
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
15:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
16:32 Great Malvern to London Paddington
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:47 Bristol Temple Meads to Frome
20:58 Frome to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
21:28 Weymouth to Westbury
21:33 Westbury to Salisbury
21:35 Maidenhead to Marlow
22:02 Marlow to Maidenhead
22:28 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
22:35 Maidenhead to Marlow
23:03 Marlow to Maidenhead
23:33 Reading to Gatwick Airport
23:50 Maidenhead to Marlow
07/05/24 00:17 Marlow to Maidenhead
07/05/24 04:45 Redhill to Gatwick Airport
07/05/24 05:11 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Short Run
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
10:52 Plymouth to Cardiff Central
10:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
11:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
11:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
12:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
13:11 Taunton to Cardiff Central
13:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
13:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
15:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Shrub Hill
15:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:58 London Paddington to Great Malvern
17:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
17:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury
17:50 Penzance to London Paddington
17:55 Worcester Shrub Hill to Bristol Temple Meads
18:29 Warminster to Bristol Temple Meads
18:53 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
19:45 Great Malvern to London Paddington
19:50 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
20:06 Westbury to Cheltenham Spa
20:11 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
21:00 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Shrub Hill
21:31 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
21:53 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
22:11 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
23:42 Swindon to Cheltenham Spa
Delayed
12:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
etc
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 06, 2024, 12:38:54 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[182] Okehampton-Tavistock. Discussion on reopening and potential us...
[130] Server load - 5th May 2024
[60] New station at Ashley Down, Bristol
[56] How to provide capacity and increase service to hourly each wa...
[52] Champion to Westbury
[49] CrossCountry upgrade will see 25% more rail seats
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 129 130 [131] 132 133 ... 170
  Print  
Author Topic: IETs into passenger service from 16 Oct 2017 and subsequent performance issues  (Read 556482 times)
a-driver
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 977


View Profile
« Reply #1950 on: July 24, 2019, 10:19:25 »

Are there any 9-cars out today. I’ve heard they’ve discovered issues with the electrical overhead equipment which may be specific to the 9-car sets only.

We had a 9-car 802 on the 0629 from Swansea this morning, which is usually 5+5. Sounds like whatever's going on, the sets are just in unusual places.

There are 6 units stopped for incidents beyond Hitachi control.  1x fatality checks.  1x animal strike repairs. 2x sidelight replacement (don’t you love school holidays) and 2x windscreen replacement.  I’m afraid no matter how good the engineering and reliability, you cannot eliminate these incidents.

But it does highlight why you shouldn’t demand 98% fleet availability to run your advertised timetable, come December and the new timetable this will be even more of an issue.

Obviously what I was told about electrical equipment issues on the 9-cars is incorrect!!
Logged
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 9852



View Profile
« Reply #1951 on: July 24, 2019, 10:46:09 »

9 car (802 112) on the 06:35 London Paddington to Penzance.

It was a 25 minute late start though after the set was late from the depot. Not sure if there was a problem with the original train and they stepped up another unit or fixed the original one.
Logged
Oxonhutch
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1248



View Profile
« Reply #1952 on: July 24, 2019, 12:14:12 »

There are 6 units stopped for incidents beyond Hitachi control.  1x fatality checks.  1x animal strike repairs. 2x sidelight replacement (don’t you love school holidays) and 2x windscreen replacement.  I’m afraid no matter how good the engineering and reliability, you cannot eliminate these incidents.

With the HSTs (High Speed Train), almost all of those sets could have been kept in service with a replacement Class 43 loco. If there were no spare locos, you could keep three sets in service!
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5416



View Profile
« Reply #1953 on: July 24, 2019, 12:51:09 »

Are there any 9-cars out today. I’ve heard they’ve discovered issues with the electrical overhead equipment which may be specific to the 9-car sets only.

We had a 9-car 802 on the 0629 from Swansea this morning, which is usually 5+5. Sounds like whatever's going on, the sets are just in unusual places.

There are 6 units stopped for incidents beyond Hitachi control.  1x fatality checks.  1x animal strike repairs. 2x sidelight replacement (don’t you love school holidays) and 2x windscreen replacement.  I’m afraid no matter how good the engineering and reliability, you cannot eliminate these incidents.

Whilst I agree that these incidents can not be eliminated, they are unfortunately entirely foreseeable hazards of running a train service. The fleet size should have been sufficient for a reasonable level of such mishaps.
I don't recall HSTs (High Speed Train) to Plymouth or to Penzance EVER being half length.
And yes I AM AWARE that HST shortages were covered by substituting turbos on the shorter routes so as to free up HSTs for the longer distance West country routes.

That however is no consolation for the longer distance customer who formerly ALLWAYS got a full length train, but now has a lottery as to train length.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
a-driver
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 977


View Profile
« Reply #1954 on: July 24, 2019, 14:38:58 »

Correct me if I’m wrong though, I usually am!  GWR (Great Western Railway) have 93 IET (Intercity Express Train) sets (minus 2 that haven’t entered service yet) with a daily requirement for 78 diagrams, obviously that increases in December
There still seems to be a lot out of traffic given the number of cancellations and short forms.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10125


View Profile
« Reply #1955 on: July 24, 2019, 14:45:49 »


A lot of shortforms today too;

19:03 London Paddington to Plymouth due 22:22

Could be fun! Good job it is mid-week.

Looks like that one is now a 10-car (802001/6), along with the other workings on that diagram.  You can't trust JourneyCheck.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
a-driver
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 977


View Profile
« Reply #1956 on: July 24, 2019, 15:58:04 »


A lot of shortforms today too;

19:03 London Paddington to Plymouth due 22:22

Could be fun! Good job it is mid-week.

Looks like that one is now a 10-car (802001/6), along with the other workings on that diagram.  You can't trust JourneyCheck.

Again, I suppose JourneyCheck doesn’t allow for sets coming good during the day or for the planners to juggle things around.  It’s initially sent through at the beginning of service or when the diagram commences, it’ll then assume the whole diagram will be short formed.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7173


View Profile
« Reply #1957 on: July 24, 2019, 16:53:00 »

Correct me if I’m wrong though, I usually am!  GWR (Great Western Railway) have 93 IET (Intercity Express Train) sets (minus 2 that haven’t entered service yet) with a daily requirement for 78 diagrams, obviously that increases in December
There still seems to be a lot out of traffic given the number of cancellations and short forms.

That's close to the level the fleets were sized on. To break the numbers down as full fleet/minimum in service:

class   800/0     802/0    total
5-car   36/32*    22/19    58/51
class   800/3     802/1   
9-car   21/18*    14/16     35/30

For class 800 (owned by Angel/Hitachi) the contracted in-service number (*) is known
For class 802 (leased from Eversholt) I have assumed a similar fraction (which could be wrong).

With those two units still awaited, there should be 79 available as a minimum.
Logged
Incider
Transport Scholar
Full Member
******
Posts: 98


View Profile
« Reply #1958 on: July 24, 2019, 20:25:05 »

There are 6 units stopped for incidents beyond Hitachi control.  1x fatality checks.  1x animal strike repairs. 2x sidelight replacement (don’t you love school holidays) and 2x windscreen replacement.  I’m afraid no matter how good the engineering and reliability, you cannot eliminate these incidents.

With the HSTs (High Speed Train), almost all of those sets could have been kept in service with a replacement Class 43 loco. If there were no spare locos, you could keep three sets in service!

The sidelights would stop any DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit). A fatality set (including HST) must be kept together until testing completed. If the animal strike was just the leading vehicle, then a power car change would sort it, but I guarantee that GWR (Great Western Railway) would not have had enough spare power cars to make up that many sets.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10125


View Profile
« Reply #1959 on: July 28, 2019, 17:18:02 »

I wonder if GWR (Great Western Railway) have taken this up this with Hitachi?

I heard a couple of weeks ago that Hitachi had hired a specialist contractor to work on each unit at a time to bring the external elements back to an ‘as new’ condition following wash plant problems.  They are doing one unit a day and started at the end of May, so a third of the fleet should have been done by now and all finished by the end of August.

Certainly lots more shiny ‘as new’ looking IETs (Intercity Express Train) around at the moment, so they’re clearly getting through them.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 9852



View Profile
« Reply #1960 on: July 28, 2019, 17:28:22 »

For some reason I missed the original posts on this subject.  I was told there had been problems with all of Hitachi's wash plants - so presumably some sort of design issue. 

As has been noted the external appearance of the IETs (Intercity Express Train) has certainly improved in recent weeks.  Been on a few over the last few days which looked they were just out of the showroom.
Logged
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #1961 on: July 29, 2019, 08:44:45 »

Is the gramophone needle stuck ?

A few minutes ago I checked JourneyCheck and all excuses for Formation Updates were singularly ;-

This is due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time.


be it an IET (Intercity Express Train) service or a sprinter service, I can understand the sprinter because of their age but the IET's ? being soooo new !!!!
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #1962 on: July 30, 2019, 14:19:49 »

Oh dear, here we go again.......

From the WNXX (Stored Unserviceable, Mainline Locos HQ All Classes) Forum:
Quote
The Hitachi mobile technician was busy at Exeter this morning. 1A72 and 1A73 both had issues after being struck by waves and spray at Dawlish. 1A73 (05:29 Plymouth to Paddington) with 802106 left Exeter 51 minutes late after multiple GUs had shut down. Next along was 1A72 (05:53 Plymouth to Paddington) with 802104. This also had multiple GUs shut down whilst traversing the Dawlish sea wall. This departed Exeter 25 minutes late after the technician managed to get 3 of the GUs working. 1A72 overtook 1A73 at Exeter (instead of at Westbury) as restarting the GUs on 1A73 took longer.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5416



View Profile
« Reply #1963 on: July 30, 2019, 14:58:50 »

So much for the essential requirement that these units be "Dawlish proof"
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10125


View Profile
« Reply #1964 on: July 30, 2019, 15:37:39 »

I’m sure they will be, even if there are a few headaches to overcome on the way to ensuring they are.  Just like there have been with the CCTV (Closed Circuit Tele Vision) cameras.  Wasn’t sea wall resilience part of the contract with Hitachi?

Unlike the occasional forays of a particular Voyager set, each 802 will be making almost daily passes by the sea wall working a much more politically sensitive service.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 129 130 [131] 132 133 ... 170
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page