Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 11:35 02 May 2024
* Spectacular thunderstorms rumble across UK
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 18/05/24 - BRTA Westbury
22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber

On this day
2nd May (1859)
Royal Albert Bridge opens

Train RunningCancelled
11:00 Oxford to London Paddington
11:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
12:00 Oxford to London Paddington
13:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
Short Run
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
09:50 Penzance to Plymouth
10:24 Paignton to Exmouth
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Delayed
06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 02, 2024, 11:49:02 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[203] Vintage film - how valid are these issues today?
[97] Leven, Fife, Scotland, fast forward a month
[89] Train drivers "overwhelmingly white middle aged men"
[71] Visiting the pub on the way home.
[26] underground plans for Bristol update.
[19] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
  Print  
Author Topic: Campaign to reopen Didcot to Southampton railway  (Read 22412 times)
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5319


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: July 08, 2014, 12:15:47 »

Another 'solution without a problem'.   

At the risk of sounding like a stuck record, as mentioned on the previous page, NR» (Network Rail - home page) already have published achievable plans to cope with freight increases to Southampton, including operating some trains via Salisbury and Andover in the medium term, and in the longer term some via Salisbury, Westbury and Melksham.

This re-opening has absolutely no chance of happening IMHO (in my humble opinion) - joining the SWML (South Western Mail Line) at Winchester would just put more trains down the 2 track bottleneck that is Winchester station itself, because the route via Winchester Chesil is no longer available thanks to the A34 and the M3, that's even if they could ever get round Newbury...

Paul
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6438


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: July 08, 2014, 18:15:30 »

Quote

...the mood at the meeting was generally supportive.


There were fifteen people there, and they were generally supportive...



I agree - unless they were 15 engineers, transport experts, Southampton dock directors and folks of that ill, it hardly augurs well. The cause will not have been advanced.

Building alongside the A34 may be feasible - Manchester's excellent Metrolink extension to the airport, soon to open over a year early, follows a motorway for part of its length. So it is worth these enthusiasts, these few, this band of brothers, working up plans. Given the learned comments on these pages, though, their efforts may serve only to show that cheaper alternatives are available. The problem is capacity for freight from a growing Southampton port, not enabling a few passengers to travel from Oxford to Winchester without passing through Basingstoke.

Electrification between Bristol Parkway and Birmingham will surely come one day. It may have no effect on this argument, though.
Logged

Now, please!
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40850



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #32 on: April 20, 2020, 16:55:57 »

6 years since there was last a post in this thread ... though I think the idea isn't as absurd as it once was with even increasing traffic (until last month anyway) until last month from Southampton to The North.

From my 1960 timetable ...

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 9843



View Profile
« Reply #33 on: April 20, 2020, 17:04:51 »

Just to note Rex Hora, the spokesman for the Didcot, Newbury & Southampton Railway Revival group, quoted in the earlier newspaper article died last November.
Logged
CyclingSid
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1947


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: April 21, 2020, 06:56:17 »

Just to note, that as Marlburian has noted elsewhere W Berks Council is supporting the section north of Newbury becoming a cycle/footpath.
Logged
Reading General
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 410


View Profile
« Reply #35 on: April 25, 2020, 13:13:04 »

When I discovered this line in the mid to late 80's, as there was so much infrastructure including complete stations left, I though it would have made a wonderful heritage line akin to the watercress line, at least from Didcot to Compton. However, as I delved a little deeper, key parts in the settlements, including the trackbed at Hampstead Norreys (Norris to the railway), had been obliterated to the point it was difficult to see where the line went. Beyond settlements, the trackbed was pretty much complete, which reinforced the belief that it could reopen. Over time, more and more of the line has been built on, cuttings filled in with rubbish and bridges removed to the point that it is difficult to believe that a railway was ever there. Nevertheless, there is still plenty to see and plenty of trackbed and bridges and this is why I would support a complete cycleway from Didcot to Newbury. The Diddy to the first station south, Upton and Blewbury, is already a fantastic tarmac cycle path that runs high up on an embankment in places that gives an insight as to what riding on a train along that stretch was like. The new section of path from Hampstead Norreys to Hermitage is open and already proving quite popular. So just a few gaps to fill in if you can get people living next to the trackbed onside. I've roughly done the line on foot between Didcot and Newbury but it would be nice to be able to do it as close as possibly to the former permanent way.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4453


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: April 25, 2020, 13:48:22 »

I remember the level crossing gates on the A417 at Upton in the 1960's and 70's
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #37 on: April 26, 2020, 11:31:12 »

My paternal Grandmother met my grandfather at West Woody House when he was convalescing during WW!. After WW2 she lived in Southampton and used to tell me about taking the DNS (Domain name service)  to Woodhay to visit old friends. i also recall seeing City of Truro at Eastleigh on a DNS train. When it had it's spell working from Didcot
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10122


View Profile
« Reply #38 on: April 26, 2020, 13:49:17 »

From my 1960 timetable ...

A sensible commuting option from Didcot to Newbury arriving at 08:21 and departing at 17:45.  Oh, no, hang on - the 17:45 only runs on Saturdays!
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Reading General
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 410


View Profile
« Reply #39 on: April 26, 2020, 14:18:31 »

What sort of service would we see today if the line between Didcot and Newbury remained? An hourly service with a passing place at Hampstead Norreys (Norris)? This could be an extension of the Reading to Newbury stopping service reversing at Newbury. I would think there wouldn't be through running at Didcot to avoid crossing the main line.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40850



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #40 on: April 26, 2020, 15:46:57 »

What sort of service would we see today if the line between Didcot and Newbury remained? An hourly service with a passing place at Hampstead Norreys (Norris)? This could be an extension of the Reading to Newbury stopping service reversing at Newbury. I would think there wouldn't be through running at Didcot to avoid crossing the main line.

I doubt it would be an extension of Reading to Newbury as that's electric.  We've already seen that the official verdict on extending electrification to Bedwyn was "not worth it" and even extending from Didcot to Oxford was halted.  Perhaps Hanborough to Bedwyn.  Not sure how you would avoid crossing or at least joining the main line at Didcot  - no bay at the south side and I suspect not space for one.

I don't think the DN&S ever had commuting options, did it?  I suspect it was always a think service.
 
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Reading General
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 410


View Profile
« Reply #41 on: April 26, 2020, 16:45:07 »

There was a bay at Didcot which would have been retained I guess. Had the line survived we probably wouldn't have seen much interaction with any junctions with it at Didcot, except for perhaps stock movements. Commuting to London in particular wouldn't have seen much unless you had a reversing DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) at either end but possibly Hermitage and Upton could have seen some with passengers changing at Newbury or Didcot respectively. A through train from Reading possibly would have helped passenger traffic develop in the British Rail/Network SouthEast days if the DMU stopper had reversed at Newbury but, like you say, that would have been severed upon electrification. Nevertheless if it had ridden out those days it could have reshaped the Newbury or Didcot of today and Hermitage would probably be a much larger village.
Logged
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1425


View Profile
« Reply #42 on: April 26, 2020, 17:11:01 »

The railway alignment in Didcot itself was used for much of Hitchcock Way which forms the main E-W route on to the east of the town. The place where the railway used to cross Broadway is more or less exactly at the Jubilee Roundabout (Aldi), which reveals itself the rough date of construction as 1977 (the development of houses built to the south of this have the roads named after Royal houses and palaces). The cycleway starts the other side of Broadway. There was actually a short siding off the mainline just before the DN&S split; the name of the industrial estate there now preserves the name of Rich's Sidings.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4453


View Profile
« Reply #43 on: April 26, 2020, 21:16:26 »

The problem with the DN&S is that it was never treated as a trunk route (except for a short time in the mid 1940's).  It should have been the through route for the Midlands and Northern traffic to Southampton, but that was always, as now, routed through Reading and Basingstoke. 

The GCR» (Gloucester - next trains) tried running through that way, but did not want to upset the L&SWR» (South Western Railway - about) so carried on with the route through Reading which gave the L&SWR more of the traffic. 

As a local passenger or goods service it struggled to pay its way, yet it had so much more potential. 
Logged
Reading General
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 410


View Profile
« Reply #44 on: April 26, 2020, 21:34:42 »

I'm reading one of the books about it now and it appears it was even stifled in the British Rail years. There was never much attempt to encourage more passenger journeys.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page