Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 11:15 03 May 2024
- Mind the gap - but when does the gap become a 'death trap'?
- Train strikes: How May's disruption affects you
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 18/05/24 - BRTA Westbury
22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber

On this day
3rd May (1954)
Lochluichart new station opens (link)

Train RunningCancelled
10:26 Frome to Bristol Temple Meads
11:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
11:41 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
11:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
11:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
13:07 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
Short Run
07:23 Carmarthen to London Paddington
08:56 Great Malvern to London Paddington
Delayed
09:51 Warminster to Gloucester
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 03, 2024, 11:18:56 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[162] Severn Tunnel emergency closure, 2nd May 2024.
[149] Vintage film - how valid are these issues today?
[76] underground plans for Bristol update.
[48] Train drivers "overwhelmingly white middle aged men"
[46] Rail unions strike action 2022/2023/2024
[26] Leven, Fife, Scotland, fast forward a month
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Worst overcrowding on record  (Read 1322 times)
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7805



View Profile
« on: August 01, 2017, 19:13:37 »

....on the back of the report in the Sunday Times giving the details of the appalling punctuality rates, this completes the picture........

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/train-overcrowding-worst-levels-labour-party-southern-rail-companies-virgin-andy-mcdonald-transport-a7869676.html
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10124


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2017, 19:26:39 »

They should use the word 'services' rather than 'routes' as that implies all trains are as full as the flawed survey data that lists the alleged top 10.

No doubt the squeeze is getting worse on average though.  Fortunately of course services into Paddington are about to receive a massive boost, so in a couple of years things should have eased considerably.  I recognise that will be of little comfort to those traveling in the meantime.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7805



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: August 01, 2017, 20:11:20 »

Just out of interest, how is the survey data "flawed" and the top 10 "alleged"?
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 01, 2017, 20:30:35 »

Firstly, several of the top 10 only entered the list by virtue of having a couple of minutes added to their journey time to make the services more reliable given the London Bridge work. This took them above the 20 min threshold beyond which only seating capacity is used, rather than seating plus a notional allocation for standing passengers.  This is explained in the report but conveniently ignored by Labour.

More importantly, to base one's  judgement of overcrowding on the railways in general on the ten worst services identified each year is a bit like basing inflation on the item in the survey which has gone up most. It's far too simplistic.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7805



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: August 01, 2017, 20:47:54 »

Firstly, several of the top 10 only entered the list by virtue of having a couple of minutes added to their journey time to make the services more reliable given the London Bridge work. This took them above the 20 min threshold beyond which only seating capacity is used, rather than seating plus a notional allocation for standing passengers.  This is explained in the report but conveniently ignored by Labour.

More importantly, to base one's  judgement of overcrowding on the railways in general on the ten worst services identified each year is a bit like basing inflation on the item in the survey which has gone up most. It's far too simplistic.

That's interesting, thanks, I'm surprised that the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) didn't use that analysis to rebut the article.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10124


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: August 01, 2017, 21:19:17 »

I'm surprised they insist on releasing the data in the first place.

Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page