Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:55 02 May 2024
- Protesters held as asylum seekers' transfer thwarted
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 18/05/24 - BRTA Westbury
22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber

On this day
2nd May (1859)
Royal Albert Bridge opens

Train RunningCancelled
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
20:50 Truro to Falmouth Docks
20:56 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
21:22 Falmouth Docks to Truro
21:59 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
22:30 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
23:30 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
Short Run
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:50 Penzance to Cardiff Central
17:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
17:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
17:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
18:18 London Paddington to Swansea
18:18 Carmarthen to London Paddington
18:23 Swansea to London Paddington
18:24 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
18:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
18:48 London Paddington to Swansea
18:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
19:14 Taunton to Cardiff Central
19:15 Penzance to Bristol Temple Meads
19:18 London Paddington to Swansea
19:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
19:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:48 London Paddington to Swansea
19:56 Cardiff Central to Taunton
20:23 Swansea to London Paddington
20:24 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
20:24 Exmouth to Cardiff Central
20:30 Carmarthen to Bristol Parkway
20:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
21:08 Paignton to Bristol Temple Meads
21:30 Cardiff Central to Frome
21:45 Penzance to London Paddington
21:48 London Paddington to Swansea
22:49 London Paddington to Swansea
Delayed
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 18:22 Bristol Temple Meads to Portsmouth Harbour
20:48 London Paddington to Swansea
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 22:42 Exeter St Davids to Bristol Temple Meads
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 02, 2024, 21:02:16 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[260] Vintage film - how valid are these issues today?
[80] Rail unions strike action 2022/2023/2024
[46] Leven, Fife, Scotland, fast forward a month
[42] Train drivers "overwhelmingly white middle aged men"
[34] underground plans for Bristol update.
[34] Visiting the pub on the way home.
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17 ... 63
  Print  
Author Topic: Class 387 coming to Thames Valley - ongoing discussion  (Read 464273 times)
Adelante_CCT
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1314



View Profile
« Reply #210 on: April 25, 2016, 18:48:50 »

Yes you did...
Quote
The additional Hayes-Pad electric services have been postponed & will now start in September

From here: http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=5066.msg194233#msg194233


Although I was referring to the fact about whether the Greenford services would still be curtailed or not and whether the Hayes shuttle would still run (using a turbo)
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7805



View Profile
« Reply #211 on: April 25, 2016, 19:07:07 »

I posted a few days ago (I guess in the wrong thread) that they're postponed till September

.............another delay!  Angry
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12368


View Profile Email
« Reply #212 on: April 25, 2016, 19:23:56 »

I understood no other changes until then. So Greenfords are ok
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12368


View Profile Email
« Reply #213 on: May 13, 2016, 15:52:56 »

The first photo of the first new build 387 from Modern Railways twitter feed
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5319


View Profile
« Reply #214 on: May 13, 2016, 16:24:46 »

Still set up for DC (Direct Current) pickup then.   That'll come in handy on the "Gatwicks" at some time in the future.

(Or on diversions into Waterloo, or extensions beyond Basingstoke, or various other fantasy schemes...)

Paul
Logged
Adelante_CCT
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1314



View Profile
« Reply #215 on: May 13, 2016, 17:43:54 »

Could this not have been added to the existing class 387 thread?
http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=14927.0
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4363


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #216 on: May 13, 2016, 19:58:16 »

Still set up for DC (Direct Current) pickup then.   That'll come in handy on the "Gatwicks" at some time in the future.

(Or on diversions into Waterloo, or extensions beyond Basingstoke, or various other fantasy schemes...)

Paul

Standard build I suspect easier to leave them as contracted than to vary to contract, the shoe beam can be removed later.

Also I suspect initially the Unit will be maintained at Selhurst until the GWR (Great Western Railway) depots get skilled up and set up to maintain them, so the shoe gear will be needed to run them out of North Pole and along the West London Line
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12368


View Profile Email
« Reply #217 on: May 13, 2016, 20:36:40 »

Are these to be maintained at North Pole? Thought they are replacing the turbos in Reading
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4363


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #218 on: May 13, 2016, 21:24:08 »

Are these to be maintained at North Pole? Thought they are replacing the turbos in Reading
Will do in the longer term, but the initial Padd Hayes service will not have wires to Reading, the only electrified route on and off of the GWML (Great Western Main Line) is via North Pole onto the West London Line, which is still signalled, and wired 25kV with the transition to 3rd rail at Westway
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17900


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #219 on: May 13, 2016, 23:08:01 »

Could this not have been added to the existing class 387 thread?
http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=14927.0

Yes, fair point - and it now has been moved and merged, in the interests of continuity and ease of future reference.  Wink
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4453


View Profile
« Reply #220 on: May 14, 2016, 08:44:07 »

Are these to be maintained at North Pole? Thought they are replacing the turbos in Reading

It was suggested below that North pole is only the route for getting them to Selhurst rather than being the place where maintenance would be carried out initially. 

Also I suspect initially the Unit will be maintained at Selhurst until the GWR (Great Western Railway) depots get skilled up and set up to maintain them, so the shoe gear will be needed to run them out of North Pole and along the West London Line
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #221 on: May 28, 2016, 12:18:57 »

I don't think this has been mentioned elsewhere, but there is a very confident story in Modern Railways this month that GWR (Great Western Railway) will not be getting the GTR 387's after all, but will be getting 37 brand shiny new units instead. 8 of these are the ones currently under construction, to be followed by the remaining 14 from the Porterbrook speculative build, topped up by an additional order of 15 units. 

Good news for Bombardier if this is the case - the incremental extensions to the production line all add up to a tidy volume.

The report also suggests that GWR are cooling on the Class 365s, and would prefer a further build of AT300s.  Also that they are still looking at a few hybrid Class 387s!

The final point to note is that this will be the last order for the Class 387 in their current form. All the cabs have to be built by the end of September else they won't comply with updated crashworthiness regulations.  Quite who sees fit to demand a further increase in crashworthiness is beyond me, given that the recent safety record on the railways would suggest that the incremental benefit must be miniscule. 
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5319


View Profile
« Reply #222 on: May 28, 2016, 12:33:26 »

The final point to note is that this will be the last order for the Class 387 in their current form. All the cabs have to be built by the end of September else they won't comply with updated crashworthiness regulations.  Quite who sees fit to demand a further increase in crashworthiness is beyond me, given that the recent safety record on the railways would suggest that the incremental benefit must be miniscule. 

There was some discussion of this in wnxx, and I saw some doubt about the cut off date, with a well placed insider saying it is actually September 2017.   But in any case the cab sub assemblies only have to be started, they don't have to be fitted onto units at that date.

Paul
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10124


View Profile
« Reply #223 on: May 29, 2016, 09:45:41 »

It would certainly make things a little easier if they're all new build as the internal colour scheme can be fitted out as GWR (Great Western Railway) want it with no modifications on the (admittedly fairly neutral) GTR interiors.  Bit puzzled why AT300s would be preferred to 365s though?  The 365s were to become part of the suburban fleet for which the AT300s would be unsuitable, and we're always being told how stupidly expensive to lease the Hitachi trains are going to be?

The scenario I could see developing is that electrification is being delayed so much that the 387s would be able to cover what diagrams are needed until the Class 345 Elizabeth Line trains start to take over the majority of the suburban services in 2019, when the 387s would then be able to cover delayed electrification routes such as Oxford, so there would be no need for 365s in that event.  Perhaps a few more AT300s could then be obtained to deal with any capacity shortages on the main line services?
« Last Edit: May 29, 2016, 15:42:38 by IndustryInsider » Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Gordon the Blue Engine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 752


View Profile
« Reply #224 on: May 29, 2016, 10:15:02 »

How realistic/practical is it to make a few Class 387^s into hybrids, and what would the time scale be?  Surely you can^t just stick a heavy diesel engine and alternator set under the frames?  I could see hybrid 387^s might be useful to cover the Didcot-Oxford gap and thus enable Oxford stoppers go to 387^s in December 2017, and also to keep the Bedwyn^s going as through trains. 

But is this really technically and financially viable?
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17 ... 63
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page