Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:35 02 May 2024
- Protesters held as asylum seekers' transfer thwarted
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 18/05/24 - BRTA Westbury
22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber

On this day
2nd May (1859)
Royal Albert Bridge opens

Train RunningCancelled
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
20:50 Truro to Falmouth Docks
20:56 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
21:22 Falmouth Docks to Truro
21:59 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
22:30 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
23:30 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
Short Run
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:50 Penzance to Cardiff Central
17:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
17:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
17:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
17:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
18:18 London Paddington to Swansea
18:18 Carmarthen to London Paddington
18:23 Swansea to London Paddington
18:24 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
18:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
18:48 London Paddington to Swansea
18:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
19:14 Taunton to Cardiff Central
19:15 Penzance to Bristol Temple Meads
19:18 London Paddington to Swansea
19:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
19:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:48 London Paddington to Swansea
19:56 Cardiff Central to Taunton
20:23 Swansea to London Paddington
20:24 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
20:24 Exmouth to Cardiff Central
20:30 Carmarthen to Bristol Parkway
20:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
21:08 Paignton to Bristol Temple Meads
21:30 Cardiff Central to Frome
21:45 Penzance to London Paddington
21:48 London Paddington to Swansea
22:49 London Paddington to Swansea
Delayed
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 18:22 Bristol Temple Meads to Portsmouth Harbour
20:48 London Paddington to Swansea
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 22:42 Exeter St Davids to Bristol Temple Meads
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 02, 2024, 20:49:23 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[260] Vintage film - how valid are these issues today?
[80] Rail unions strike action 2022/2023/2024
[46] Leven, Fife, Scotland, fast forward a month
[42] Train drivers "overwhelmingly white middle aged men"
[34] underground plans for Bristol update.
[34] Visiting the pub on the way home.
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Concern over "crumbling" footbridge at Earley.  (Read 4721 times)
Marlburian
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 692


View Profile
« on: February 09, 2021, 12:01:24 »

On the Reading Chronicle news website. It does look  a bit fragile.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10124


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: February 09, 2021, 12:04:26 »

Slow news day in Earley?   Wink
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: February 09, 2021, 13:22:10 »

Slow news day in Earley?   Wink

Are you kidding? Things haven't been this Exciting in Earley since the Ultrasonic Drain Sensor trial...
Logged

Vous devez ĂȘtre impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7173


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 09, 2021, 14:43:53 »

I should perhaps add that this is not the station footbridge. That's a modest metal structure on the platforms. This one is a long-distance (well over 100 m) link to Woodley, crossing the railway and the A329(M)/A3290. Before that "motorway" was built (ca. 1970), there was (briefly) a level crossing, reduced from then to a barrow crossing. 

So it's only 50 years old - why is it crumbling away? It looks like some fence posts of a similar age I took out a few years ago, so I guess those supports were made to a similar standard (and by the same kind of makers). After all, it was "only" a footbridge!

The railway angle - it's WBC's bridge - is that they intend (obviously) the replacement to be step-free, and thought NR» (Network Rail - home page) would want to collaborate so it could serve the station platforms too. But (according to that report) they met with a brusque refusal. I think I read something similar only a few days ago: that NR would not join forces with another council to upgrade platform access. Perhaps that's for the best - NR has cumbersome, expensive, way of doing things even when they are collaborating only with themselves.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5415



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 09, 2021, 15:28:46 »

My concerns about this or any other footbidge in apparently doubtful condition would not be failure under normal conditions, but the potential for collapse under exceptional loading.

Thinking for example of a popular steamer passing and huge numbers crowding the bridge to get a good view. Despite my stoutness I would be happy to use this footbridge along with a handful of others passing from one side to the other.
I would be reluctant to join any large crowd on the bridge, nor to stand under it when crowded.
I might also think twice about crossing the bridge (or standing under it) in gale force winds.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40851



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #5 on: February 09, 2021, 15:53:34 »

I would be reluctant to join any large crowd on the bridge, nor to stand under it when crowded.

Reminds me of certain bridges with signs telling you to break rank when crossing ... from June 2018



I wouldn't want to stand under the Early bridge at any time - too much risk of a train coming along!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1538



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: February 09, 2021, 22:40:18 »

What a weird coincidence - two posts on the same day that indirectly relate to Accor Group hotels where I can give noise related advice! (see also -http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=24647.msg301782#msg301782) 

The building in the background on the far side of the River Ness in Grahame's photo of the Inverness footbridge is the Mercure hotel. Here the advice is to book a room on the river side, not one facing the other side towards the station, as rowdy town centre revellers can give you a disturbed night sleep.

I think this now exhausts this particular obscure backwater of my consciousness.......
Logged
CyclingSid
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1947


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: February 10, 2021, 07:00:11 »

Quote
Ultrasonic Drain Sensor trial...
Good job they didn't install them in Reading, they would be going off all the time. Not that RBC(resolve) would probably take any notice.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page