Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 18:35 02 May 2024
* Protesters held as asylum seekers' transfer thwarted
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 18/05/24 - BRTA Westbury
22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber

On this day
2nd May (1859)
Royal Albert Bridge opens

Train RunningCancelled
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
Short Run
15:28 Weymouth to Gloucester
16:18 London Paddington to Swansea
16:23 Swansea to London Paddington
16:48 London Paddington to Swansea
17:18 London Paddington to Swansea
18:18 London Paddington to Swansea
18:23 Swansea to London Paddington
18:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:48 London Paddington to Swansea
18:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
19:18 London Paddington to Swansea
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:48 London Paddington to Swansea
21:45 Penzance to London Paddington
Delayed
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
15:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
17:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 02, 2024, 18:46:12 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[260] Vintage film - how valid are these issues today?
[80] Rail unions strike action 2022/2023/2024
[46] Leven, Fife, Scotland, fast forward a month
[42] Train drivers "overwhelmingly white middle aged men"
[34] underground plans for Bristol update.
[34] Visiting the pub on the way home.
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Class 172 on test  (Read 7295 times)
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« on: March 17, 2010, 10:37:50 »

Couple of pictures of 172001 at Old Dalby test track last week here

http://www.old-dalby.com/present.htm
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 17, 2010, 13:48:18 »

Looks like 220/222 bogies?

Funny place to put the exhaust too, right above the rear bogie.
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 17, 2010, 14:13:42 »

Looks like 220/222 bogies?

Correct. I think it has been done to make them lighter and improve acceleration.
Logged
Sprog
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 109


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: March 18, 2010, 08:46:28 »

Looks like 220/222 bogies?

Funny place to put the exhaust too, right above the rear bogie.

That's going to be a nice hazard for maintenance staff!!
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 18, 2010, 23:07:06 »

Think it's probably to help the maintenance staff, since the exhaust will presumably be rather more easily accessible than in other trains.
Logged
Sprog
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 109


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: March 20, 2010, 10:16:02 »

Think it's probably to help the maintenance staff, since the exhaust will presumably be rather more easily accessible than in other trains.

As a maintenance staff member myself(!), to be honest from the looks of it, the exhaust will be more of a hinderance than a help. Exhaust systems barely need to be touched in comparison to the components requiring regular maintenance/inspection that the exhaust pipe shown covers.

It was probably a last minute thought/edition to the design, as often occurs, and i should imagine that it will not only pose a major burn risk to a staff, but also be more velnerable to impact damge etc than other DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) vehciles where it is safely routed underneath.
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 20, 2010, 11:10:49 »

I'll take your word for it but it seems odd that a firm which maintains trains as well as builds them would not have talked to people from the maintenance side to get their view on putting the exhaust there.

Just that it looked to me as though it was all part of the move to being able to more quickly reach, remove and replace underfloor equipment, such as using engine rafts and the like.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5319


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 20, 2010, 13:41:55 »

The exhaust normaly runs over the bogie on Sprinters etc, but they have traditional external framed bogies. AIUI (as I understand it) the new bogies have internal frames like 220s so there may be no option but to go outside the wheels. I believe on both types of Voyager the exhaust runs internally through the carriage, somewhere around the bulkhead between the saloon and vestibule - it certinly isn't visible on the carriage ends. Possibly in 221s, with external frames, the tilt gear prevents the exhaust running over the bogie.

Paul
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: June 09, 2010, 10:10:33 »

172s rumoured to be delayed until Summer 2011 due to various problems with the first few units that need sorting - most notably I suspect is the fact that exhaust gases were getting into the air con systems.

Many more months of loco hauled services it is then!
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: June 09, 2010, 11:21:44 »

Is that date the start or end of the roll out?
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: June 09, 2010, 11:28:10 »

Is that date the start or end of the roll out?

Date of start, as the 172s have been returned to Derby for rectification works. Presumably something is being done to the exhaust. Not to mention the fact that they are apparently not able to reach 100mph!
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10124


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: June 09, 2010, 12:39:35 »

I wonder if that will scupper the planned start dates of Dec '10 and May '11 for the Evergreen 3 Phase 1 timetable?
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
smithy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 471


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: June 09, 2010, 19:50:47 »

Is that date the start or end of the roll out?

Date of start, as the 172s have been returned to Derby for rectification works. Presumably something is being done to the exhaust. Not to mention the fact that they are apparently not able to reach 100mph!

the 170's could not prise 100mph from the MTU (Motor Traction Unit) lumps on original release,resulted in bigger turbos followed by engine rework as they did not like the increased boost initially.
several mtu engines went pop well before the 400k change mileage,i think 70k was more realistic at the time.

amazing they are having similar problems with what is essentially a tarted up 170?
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page