Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 17:35 02 May 2024
- Protesters thwart asylum seekers' coach transfer
- New storm weather warning as care home hit by lightning
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 18/05/24 - BRTA Westbury
22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber

On this day
2nd May (1859)
Royal Albert Bridge opens

Train RunningShort Run
15:28 Weymouth to Gloucester
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
21:45 Penzance to London Paddington
Delayed
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
14:23 Swansea to London Paddington
14:49 Plymouth to Cardiff Central
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
15:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:48 Reading to Gatwick Airport
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 02, 2024, 17:45:03 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[260] Vintage film - how valid are these issues today?
[80] Rail unions strike action 2022/2023/2024
[46] Leven, Fife, Scotland, fast forward a month
[42] Train drivers "overwhelmingly white middle aged men"
[34] underground plans for Bristol update.
[34] Visiting the pub on the way home.
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 117 118 [119] 120 121 ... 176
  Print  
Author Topic: Great Western Main Line electrification - ongoing discussion  (Read 1057525 times)
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12368


View Profile Email
« Reply #1770 on: June 03, 2016, 14:54:12 »

That is what NR» (Network Rail - home page) is saying...they will revisit once the wires are up
Logged
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1771 on: June 03, 2016, 15:39:40 »

As much as I like to have pretty looking structures, at the end of the day there have been numerous consultations and amble time for various bodies and organisations to get 100% satisfaction before any work has started.
On the other hand, while we knew about electrification a while before work started, I visit this forum very frequently, and am a subscriber to a railway magazine, and as far as I can recall was never aware of any consultation on the design of OHLE structures for the Great Western project. If somebody with an interest in railways such as myself isn't aware of a consultation, then I would imagine that others were even less aware than myself, and thus I can hardly blame the Goring complainers for being supprised when the substantial portal structures appeared.
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12368


View Profile Email
« Reply #1772 on: June 03, 2016, 15:52:44 »

Deposited with Council Oplanning Department, yhe allocation of a planning reference number would require advertising. This they had the same notification (incl the Parish Council) as they would for a new build.

I suspect that is a reason that NR» (Network Rail - home page) lodges these type of plans with Councils even though they don't need planning consent
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #1773 on: June 03, 2016, 15:57:26 »

As much as I like to have pretty looking structures, at the end of the day there have been numerous consultations and amble time for various bodies and organisations to get 100% satisfaction before any work has started.
On the other hand, while we knew about electrification a while before work started, I visit this forum very frequently, and am a subscriber to a railway magazine, and as far as I can recall was never aware of any consultation on the design of OHLE structures for the Great Western project. If somebody with an interest in railways such as myself isn't aware of a consultation, then I would imagine that others were even less aware than myself, and thus I can hardly blame the Goring complainers for being supprised when the substantial portal structures appeared.

But that is the point I was trying to clarify above.  There was consultation between NR» (Network Rail - home page) and West Berkshire and South Oxfordshire, and those organisations are there to represent and support residents.  Do we have any evidence that there wasn't any such consultation?

The structures are referenced in the consultation documents and have been well publicised in the railway and non-railway press.

Its like any other planning application I have been involved in, its no good complaining once the thing is built.  I always make a point of going to any public consultation meetings for issues surrounding the area where I live, even if ultimately they don't directly affect me.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12368


View Profile Email
« Reply #1774 on: June 03, 2016, 16:06:07 »

Ditto. Plus looking at ALL local-to-me planning adverts just to check. Someone on their PC will have done this too...
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #1775 on: June 03, 2016, 16:07:32 »

If you want to know about the OLE (Overhead Line Equipment, more often "OHLE") structures you only have to look here:
http://www.furrerfrey.ch/de/systeme/Series-1.html and specifcally this document to be found there:
http://www.furrerfrey.ch/dam/jcr:98f3522c-51ff-4d89-9fd7-dc16601d1db3/20130717_F+F_Series1_Web.pdf
« Last Edit: June 03, 2016, 16:23:13 by SandTEngineer » Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4453


View Profile
« Reply #1776 on: June 03, 2016, 16:19:38 »

But that is the point I was trying to clarify above.  There was consultation between NR» (Network Rail - home page) and West Berkshire and South Oxfordshire, and those organisations are there to represent and support residents.  Do we have any evidence that there wasn't any such consultation?

Yes there is evidence - See South Oxfordshire DC (Direct Current) Planning reference P13/S1892/ES

I assume that SODC would have consulted Goring Parish Council. 

Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12368


View Profile Email
« Reply #1777 on: June 03, 2016, 16:25:52 »

Quite.
Logged
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1425


View Profile
« Reply #1778 on: June 03, 2016, 18:25:04 »

There are some "Example Photographs of Proposed Overhead OLE (Overhead Line Equipment, more often "OHLE") Designs" included in the Environmental Statement Volume 2: Appendix E. However, the 4 track portals shown are significantly different in detail from the Furrer & Frey Series 1 that have been installed. In particular they are lattice rather than a solid structure. There are also illustrative pictures of headspans at a station.

So anyone who had seen these examples could well have been surprised by the metal work actually installed, especially its 'chunkiness' to be non technical.

I understand that it is the absence of any consultation at the detailed design phase that the AONB (Areas Of Natural Beauty) have been not happy about. The AONB extends way beyond Goring - from just east of Didcot to the east of Pangbourne although some areas are more beautiful than others ....
Logged
BBM
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 634


View Profile
« Reply #1779 on: June 05, 2016, 21:30:19 »

I noticed today that the first masts have now appeared at the east end of Sonning Cutting and the Twyford West crossover area.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4453


View Profile
« Reply #1780 on: June 05, 2016, 21:40:07 »

There are some "Example Photographs of Proposed Overhead OLE (Overhead Line Equipment, more often "OHLE") Designs" included in the Environmental Statement Volume 2: Appendix E. However, the 4 track portals shown are significantly different in detail from the Furrer & Frey Series 1 that have been installed. In particular they are lattice rather than a solid structure. There are also illustrative pictures of headspans at a station.

So anyone who had seen these examples could well have been surprised by the metal work actually installed, especially its 'chunkiness' to be non technical.

A good point.

I understand that it is the absence of any consultation at the detailed design phase that the AONB (Areas Of Natural Beauty) have been not happy about. The AONB extends way beyond Goring - from just east of Didcot to the east of Pangbourne although some areas are more beautiful than others ....

Ah yes.  A reputable planning consultant ought to have identified that need.  I would also have expected South Oxon DC (Direct Current) and West Berks DC to have pointed that out at the time if it was an issue. 
Logged
lordgoata
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 415



View Profile
« Reply #1781 on: June 05, 2016, 22:22:40 »

Yes there is evidence - See South Oxfordshire DC (Direct Current) Planning reference P13/S1892/ES

I assume that SODC would have consulted Goring Parish Council. 

Considering GPC are taking SODC to court over two particular recent planning approvals (the Goring Hydro-Electric scheme - and another one which I can't recall off hand), I wouldn't expect or assume anything!
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12368


View Profile Email
« Reply #1782 on: June 06, 2016, 08:56:00 »

People quite often cofuse "consult" with referenda.....meanings are quite different
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #1783 on: June 09, 2016, 10:02:27 »

Technical question. I live by the only (?) fully wired stretch (4 lines) between Burnham and Taplow, which was done at Christmas 2015.

Now we are getting a kind of gibbet being fitted on top of the horizontal arm which holds the hangers (dangly bits) for the wires. Looks like there will be another wire slung between them. What's it for?
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5319


View Profile
« Reply #1784 on: June 09, 2016, 14:00:04 »

Technical question. I live by the only (?) fully wired stretch (4 lines) between Burnham and Taplow, which was done at Christmas 2015.

Now we are getting a kind of gibbet being fitted on top of the horizontal arm which holds the hangers (dangly bits) for the wires. Looks like there will be another wire slung between them. What's it for?

From your description that's for the 'Auto Transformer Feeder' or ATF.   

As a modern design the GW (Great Western) OHLE is actually fed at 50 kV, with two anti phase 25 kV conductors.  So you get a 25 kV - Ov - 25 kV feed where the rails are the Ov line, the contact wire (and its support catenary) is at 25 kV, and your newly observed line is also at 25 kV but anti phase to the contact wire.  So the ATF needs similar insulators to the contact wire, similar clearances from structures, and needs to be positioned where it cannot accidentally touch the contact wire under fault conditions.

It's all a bit complicated electrically, but it all helps make the system far more efficient than the earliest simple 25 kV with traction return down the rails.

The autotransformers themselves are mounted in various track side compounds along the line, how they actually work in terms of detail is above my pay grade, so I think although they should be mentioned as existing, that'll do for now...

Paul
« Last Edit: June 09, 2016, 23:50:06 by paul7755 » Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 117 118 [119] 120 121 ... 176
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page