Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 12:35 06 May 2024
- Fans line streets for Ipswich Town parade
- Starliner: Nasa to fly new craft to space station
- Train strikes: How May's disruption affects you
- Families' station safety plea as third woman hit
- Eurotunnel says no queues with new travel system
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 18/05/24 - BRTA Westbury
22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber

On this day
6th May (1994)
Channel Tunnel opened (link)

Train RunningCancelled
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:52 London Paddington to Hereford
12:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
13:49 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
13:50 London Paddington to Great Malvern
13:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
14:01 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:18 Hereford to London Paddington
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
15:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
16:32 Great Malvern to London Paddington
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:47 Bristol Temple Meads to Frome
20:58 Frome to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
21:28 Weymouth to Westbury
21:33 Westbury to Salisbury
21:35 Maidenhead to Marlow
22:02 Marlow to Maidenhead
22:28 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
22:35 Maidenhead to Marlow
23:03 Marlow to Maidenhead
23:33 Reading to Gatwick Airport
23:50 Maidenhead to Marlow
07/05/24 00:17 Marlow to Maidenhead
07/05/24 04:45 Redhill to Gatwick Airport
07/05/24 05:11 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Short Run
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
10:52 Plymouth to Cardiff Central
10:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
11:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
11:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
12:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
13:11 Taunton to Cardiff Central
13:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
13:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
15:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Shrub Hill
15:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:58 London Paddington to Great Malvern
17:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
17:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury
17:50 Penzance to London Paddington
17:55 Worcester Shrub Hill to Bristol Temple Meads
18:29 Warminster to Bristol Temple Meads
18:53 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
19:45 Great Malvern to London Paddington
19:50 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
20:06 Westbury to Cheltenham Spa
20:11 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
21:00 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Shrub Hill
21:31 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
21:53 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
22:11 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
23:42 Swindon to Cheltenham Spa
Delayed
12:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
etc
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 06, 2024, 12:36:15 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[182] Okehampton-Tavistock. Discussion on reopening and potential us...
[130] Server load - 5th May 2024
[60] New station at Ashley Down, Bristol
[56] How to provide capacity and increase service to hourly each wa...
[52] Champion to Westbury
[49] CrossCountry upgrade will see 25% more rail seats
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
  Print  
Author Topic: Does anyone else miss the NOISY old HSTs?  (Read 20519 times)
6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2754



View Profile Email
« Reply #15 on: March 13, 2009, 17:32:09 »

does anyone think that these will ever get another referb or is that it for the hst's



Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6300


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: March 13, 2009, 18:47:40 »

does anyone think that these will ever get another referb or is that it for the hst's




I think that this will be the last refurb the HSTs (High Speed Train) will see relex109. They have however been done to a very high standard whether you like the seating or not as each carriage and power car was stripped to it's shell and virtually rebuilt so they will last until IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) is fully launched and beyond. I believe its safety legislation that will stop them being used after IEP is introduced. Can someone explain further on this one?

My advice is enjoy the HSTs over the next 6-7 years and hope Hitachi deliver something that is near to the quality of the HST.
Logged
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: March 13, 2009, 23:06:30 »

British Rail achieved the current official world speed record for diesel traction of 148 mph using a 2+5 Valenta-engined HST (High Speed Train) set, although Spain and Russia have claimed unofficial speed records much higher, with 168 mph in the latter case. I think I'm correct in saying that given the opportunity HSTs would quite happily rattle along regularly at 140 mph, given enough time and distance to accelerate.

As far as I know no-one's had a punt at the speed record using an MTU (Motor Traction Unit)-engined HST set. A possible PR (Public Relations) opportunity there methinks, if anyone from FGW (First Great Western) Towers is listening... I don't doubt for one moment that the HSTs still have it in them!
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10125


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: March 14, 2009, 14:08:16 »

The MTU (Motor Traction Unit) engines are downrated (by as much as 20% I think) on their design power output so that they pretty much match the old Valenta engines in performance, but save fuel, engine wear and noise. If they were allowed to run at full spec then that record would be under serious threat - the H&S (Health and Safety) red-tape that has to be cut through for any such record attempt is rather amazing though!
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #19 on: March 14, 2009, 14:40:45 »

The MTU (Motor Traction Unit) engines are downrated (by as much as 20% I think) on their design power output so that they pretty much match the old Valenta engines in performance, but save fuel, engine wear and noise. If they were allowed to run at full spec then that record would be under serious threat - the H&S (Health and Safety) red-tape that has to be cut through for any such record attempt is rather amazing though!

Interesting thoughts, I would think the H&S boys would cause a world shortage of red tape if anyone said we want to see if a MTU HST (High Speed Train) could do 150+.

It's very interesting to contrast the French attitude to rail speed records ever since WW2, of course they use specially prepared locos and TGV (Train a Grande Vitesse) sets and with less traffic and bettter track they can go for it as per the recent record on the new LGV (Large Goods Vehicle) Est. They celebrate it as a national engineering triumph.
Logged
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: March 14, 2009, 19:03:23 »

The story of 4468's world steam speed record (126 mph) on the LNER» (London North Eastern Railway - about) in 1938 is pretty hair-raising. It doesn't sound like the operating department wanted the civil engineers to find out what was afoot: right up until the day the operation was dressed up as brake trials, and after Mallard had thundered down Stoke Bank at 126 it turned out that much of the track she had run over at that speed consisted of thirty-foot jointed rail, laid almmost 30 years previously  Shocked
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4364


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: March 14, 2009, 23:11:00 »

I don't think Sir Nigel Gresley wanted his directors to know what he was planning either Mallard cost ^8,500 to build a substantial amount of money in 1938.  Gresley was quite particular picking Mallard for the run she had done a number of miles so was worn in but not overly worn; I had heard that Mallard had to be effectively rebuilt after the record run because of the mount of damage done to bearings etc.

I am sure the re-engined class 43 with a short rake of coaches could turn 150 MPH but what would it prove
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #22 on: March 15, 2009, 00:27:44 »

The Wessex Electrics hold the third rail record. Has that been "unofficially" beaten?

Why did SWT (South West Trains) get rid of them? They're better than the unreliable Junipers, and would be nice for Portsmouth commuters.

At least Southern have got some running again...
Logged
Zoe
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 746


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: March 15, 2009, 00:37:56 »

Why did SWT (South West Trains) get rid of them? They're better than the unreliable Junipers, and would be nice for Portsmouth commuters.
They were too expensive to lease.
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6300


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: March 15, 2009, 06:43:54 »

The Wessex Electrics hold the third rail record. Has that been "unofficially" beaten?

Why did SWT (South West Trains) get rid of them? They're better than the unreliable Junipers, and would be nice for Portsmouth commuters.

At least Southern have got some running again...
This was a very unpopular move with passengers on the Portsmouth-London line as SWT removed a number of their 'Intercity' style class 444s off this route to cover the 442s coming off lease between London-Bournemouth-Weymouth line replacing them with suburban 450s on the Portsmouth line which are not suited to long distance travel, bit like Voyagers when you think about it!

I like 444s but they aren't as good as the 442s as they were Intercity standard because they were based on Mk3 coaching stock.
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #25 on: March 15, 2009, 21:23:31 »

Why did SWT (South West Trains) get rid of them? They're better than the unreliable Junipers, and would be nice for Portsmouth commuters.
They were too expensive to lease.
Roll Eyes
Logged
plymothian
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 822


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: March 17, 2009, 23:03:07 »

Took a trip on NXEA (National Express East Anglia) the other week - HSTs (High Speed Train) with the original seat arrangement and carriage furnishings!  Fantastic. 
Didn't get to see what the engine was as the service was disrupted and the trains were running haphazardly with no CIS (Customer Information System) information was available so I was wandering in a daze around Liverpool Street and ended up on a random train.
Logged

Please be aware that only the first 4 words of this post will be platformed on this message board.
super tm
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 599


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: March 17, 2009, 23:05:45 »

Took a trip on NXEA (National Express East Anglia) the other week - HSTs (High Speed Train) with the original seat arrangement and carriage furnishings!  Fantastic. 
Didn't get to see what the engine was as the service was disrupted and the trains were running haphazardly with no CIS (Customer Information System) information was available so I was wandering in a daze around Liverpool Street and ended up on a random train.

You must have been in quite a daze as NXEA dont have HSTs !!
Logged
G.Uard
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 426


"Are we at Yate yet?"


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: March 18, 2009, 08:40:02 »

NXEA (National Express East Anglia) do have Mk 3s although  I am surprised that plymouthian didn't find his 'HST (High Speed Train)' a little quiet. Wink


Just to muddy the water, I believe that as far back as 1931, a German, Zepplin built railcar with a petrol engine achieved 142 mph.  This speed was surpassed by a (pre-production?) HST which clocked 143 mph in June 1973, still a world record.
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #29 on: March 18, 2009, 11:04:58 »


I am sure the re-engined class 43 with a short rake of coaches could turn 150 MPH but what would it prove

A triumph for British/German  engineering and one up on the French. But then again   I don't think they'd want a diesel record, they are very happy with all their electric records.

« Last Edit: March 18, 2009, 12:59:28 by eightf48544 » Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page