Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 16:35 03 May 2024
- Around-the-world cruise staff member missing at sea
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 18/05/24 - BRTA Westbury
22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber

On this day
3rd May (2018)
~ Just one working lower quadrant distant signal left (link)

Train RunningCancelled
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
Short Run
10:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
13:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
14:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
14:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Shrub Hill
15:59 Westbury to Gloucester
16:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
Delayed
13:28 Weymouth to Gloucester
14:39 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
14:50 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 15:48 Bristol Parkway to Weymouth
15:48 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
15:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
16:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 03, 2024, 16:43:21 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[197] Severn Tunnel emergency closure, 2nd May 2024.
[99] June to December 2024 Timetables
[71] Vintage film - how valid are these issues today?
[56] 2024 Delays and Cancellations - North Cotswold Line
[49] Reopening Cullompton and Wellington stations (merged topic)
[36] underground plans for Bristol update.
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Brighton-Bath: National Rail offering wrong ticket  (Read 1144 times)
Trowres
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 756


View Profile
« on: March 03, 2022, 00:18:24 »

Here's the scenario:
Ask the National Rail journey planner for Brighton-Bath after 08:00, with a return after 14:00.
NRJP returns (amongst other offerings) the 08:59 Brighton through service via Salisbury at the Super-Off-Peak Return of £77.50 (any permitted route)

Go to advanced search, put in "via Dean" (or Chichester, Salisbury, Avoncliff... probably others) and the JP offers an Off-Peak Return of £61.00 (via Salisbury) for the same train.

Same happens for Brighton-Bristol Temple Meads. Bug doesn't appear in GWR (Great Western Railway)'s ticket sales website.

What might be the cause of this anomaly and does it appear for services elsewhere?
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12368


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: March 03, 2022, 00:36:12 »

The return services offered on the higher fare all seem to be via London (presumably as they are faster?) whereas forcing a ‘via Dean’ means that the return has to go that way too, making for a slower journey.

The onemajor problem withthst planner - always looking for faster, easier journeys. The outward is owing to thd train being direct with no changes/cross London necessity, whereas there is no direct train back around 1400
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7173


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 03, 2022, 00:51:33 »

The return services offered on the higher fare all seem to be via London (presumably as they are faster?) whereas forcing a ‘via Dean’ means that the return has to go that way too, making for a slower journey.

The onemajor problem withthst planner - always looking for faster, easier journeys. The outward is owing to thd train being direct with no changes/cross London necessity, whereas there is no direct train back around 1400

Exactly. There is a box for you to select "Show only fastest trains", but it does seem to do that anyway. Hence it would be more useful if you could ask for something like "Always include cheapest options even if slower".

I asked NRE(resolve) about the same issue for another journey, and got a very quick reply containing (among some non-answers): "I would like to inform you that the functionality of our Journey Planner is to display the fastest route for any journey planned.".

I had a follow-up about that option box, asking what the point of it is, but it wasn't answered. Presumably you can't reply to their e-mail, but have to go back to the enquiry page on their site.
Logged
infoman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1305


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 03, 2022, 10:48:05 »

going back a little while,we were going to make a trip to Brighton from Bristol

put in route and came up with

1)BTM (Bristol Temple Meads (strictly, it should be BRI)) to london to three bridges and coach three bridges to Brighton

2)and BTM to three bridges by train changing at Reading and coach three bridges to brighton

I thought should we try the coastal route?

BTM to fareham and change at fareham to brighton both sections by train

and they say we try and keep you away from coach replacements

as a by line we were at a station somewhere between fareham and brighton on said day

Guard said we will be delayed due to faster train needing to go by us,

but if you wanna get out here and you heading for brighton it runs non stop to brighton

every one got off and caught  the "rocket" 

Thank you Guard,who ever you are


Logged
Oxonhutch
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1248



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 03, 2022, 12:06:25 »

Truly, there is a guard.
Logged
Trowres
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 756


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 03, 2022, 17:02:47 »

Thanks for the explanations given above. I should have spotted that myself!

Shame the journey planner doesn't tell you that there's a cheaper option if you adjust the route or time of return travel. Maybe more people would have used the route via Salisbury.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7173


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 03, 2022, 18:05:18 »

Thanks for the explanations given above. I should have spotted that myself!

Shame the journey planner doesn't tell you that there's a cheaper option if you adjust the route or time of return travel. Maybe more people would have used the route via Salisbury.

I suggest you complain on the NRE(resolve) web site - if they get enough it might have some effect. This is the main part my follow-up message (which probably never arrived):
Quote
Thank you for such a very prompt reply. What you say about the OJP (Online Journey Planner) always showing "fastest trains only" matches what I have seen in the past. But in that case why do you offer a tick box to choose ... exactly the same thing? Do you really expect users to understand that? Of course they will infer that the OJP normally does not suppress overtaken trains, so this box is very misleading.

But that is not 100% true of what I am seeing now - some overtaken (direct) trains are listed. They are only overtaken by a few minutes, so there may be a small tolerance allowed. The "faster trains only" option does remove those. What has changed since earlier today I don't know.

And what is the allowed margin for "slower" trains to be listed? I can't find any information on that. If it's only a few minutes, it does not prevent that option box being misleading. What I did find is this, claimed for your OJP:
"...the latest release of the Journey Planner allows users to: Find the cheapest fare (direct from A to B) over a range of dates, across different operators." I don't think that claim can be justified, given the way slightly slower trains are being suppressed.
Logged
Surrey 455
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1230


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 03, 2022, 20:28:48 »

National Rail Enquiries do have a cheapest fare finder

https://ojp.nationalrail.co.uk/service/farefinder/search

I don't know how practical or accurate it is though. Might be worth playing around with it.
Logged
Trowres
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 756


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: March 03, 2022, 23:29:53 »

Well, Surrey455, I decided to give it a go... and (this time) the cheapest fare finder did a good job, finding the "via Salisbury" fare and offering an interesting selection of trains and changing locations (in addition to the through services). My favourite was:

Bath-Wesbury-Clapham Jn-Haywards Heath-Brighton

I wonder how many times (between Clapham and Brighton) you would be challenged for using a "via Salisbury" ticket?

Logged
Surrey 455
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1230


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: March 04, 2022, 21:04:36 »

Well, Surrey455, I decided to give it a go... and (this time) the cheapest fare finder did a good job, finding the "via Salisbury" fare and offering an interesting selection of trains and changing locations (in addition to the through services). My favourite was:

Bath-Wesbury-Clapham Jn-Haywards Heath-Brighton

I wonder how many times (between Clapham and Brighton) you would be challenged for using a "via Salisbury" ticket?



Probably none. I can't remember the last time anyone checked my ticket on that stretch.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page