Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 17:35 03 May 2024
* Around-the-world cruise staff member missing at sea
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 18/05/24 - BRTA Westbury
22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber

On this day
3rd May (1954)
Lochluichart new station opens (link)

Train RunningCancelled
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
17:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
17:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
19:50 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
Short Run
14:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:59 Westbury to Gloucester
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:39 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
16:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
17:55 Worcester Shrub Hill to Bristol Temple Meads
18:53 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
Delayed
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 15:48 Bristol Parkway to Weymouth
15:48 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
15:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
16:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 03, 2024, 17:47:26 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[185] Severn Tunnel emergency closure, 2nd May 2024.
[93] June to December 2024 Timetables
[66] Vintage film - how valid are these issues today?
[56] 2024 Delays and Cancellations - North Cotswold Line
[46] Reopening Cullompton and Wellington stations (merged topic)
[34] underground plans for Bristol update.
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Delay Repay - Dodgy Data  (Read 1502 times)
Hafren
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 300


View Profile
« on: June 18, 2023, 12:55:30 »

I've had a bit of an issue with a GWR (Great Western Railway) Delay Repay claim. It's only a 15 minute delay but I'm not inclined to let it go because (1) it's been a bad train week generally so I'm not feeling sympathetic (not something anyone can totally prevent but still a huge inconvenience) and  (2) if there's a systemic issue with the claim process it could affect more significant claims and needs fixing.

Intended to catch the 17:42 from CDF» (Cardiff - next trains), arriving SWA» (Swansea - next trains) 18:33. RTT» (Real Time Trains - website) shows it departed CDF 18:02 and arrived SWA 18:58. That's a 25 minute delay.
In the end I took the 17:47 (TfW), which itself arrived 18:55, so my total delay was still 22m.
The claim remains with GWR because my intended journey was on their train, and that's what pushes me over the 15m threshold.

GWR's response:
The intended leg from 17:42 CARDIFF CENTRAL left at 18:02, scheduled to arrive at SWANSEA at 18:33, actually arrived 18:36.

I just can't see where that 18:36 comes from. I've double-checked the date on my claim, and checked the times logged on RTT.  My claim is correct. Even if it skip-stopped and had found a way to overtake the 17:47 (I'd have noticed it being looped!) the journey just can't be done in 34 minutes!

OK... perhaps they've made honest mistake... so I logged an appeal, noting the likely data glitch. But I've had the same outcome.

I just can't see where the data's come from, given that the logs on RTT are correct, and I assume their data source is ultimately the same. Is the initial claim processed by a human or fully automated?

Do I just re-appeal? At some point perhaps someone far enough up the chain can realise the data is dodgy, given how much time was allegedly recovered!
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12368


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: June 18, 2023, 14:53:57 »

I have to say that I thought you could only claim for the delay to the service you actually travel on, even if that one was preceded by another. If you changed you mind to travel on the earlier service, you had to claim for that service.
Logged
Hafren
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 300


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 18, 2023, 15:31:24 »

I've sometimes pondered that one, as I have been known to get up earlier to avoid a cancellation.

However on this occasion I travelled on a later service as next available alternative. It just happened to arrive earlier than the delayed one because of the delay. It doesn't make a material difference to this particular claim - either way I'm delayed by 15-29 minutes, so it's an incidental note; the issue is that the arrival time stated by GWR (Great Western Railway) comes from nowhere.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40856



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #3 on: June 18, 2023, 15:37:49 »

I have to say that I thought you could only claim for the delay to the service you actually travel on, ...

No, Chris.  I works for connections too.  I've been on a train delayed by 10 minutes which failed to make an "advertised" connection into an hourly ongoing service.  Waited around for an hour for the next ongoing train, which was 5 minutes late.     Maximum delay to services - 10 minutes, no repay.  Delay to journey - 65 minutes, so repay for over an hour.   Or perhaps I'm on GWR (Great Western Railway) file as being an honest but awkward bugger and that helps them make their decision.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7173


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 18, 2023, 15:38:18 »

I take it this was 1B21 on 13/6/23. Liverail/Livetrain (or Open Rail) does indeed show it as arriving SWA» (Swansea - next trains) 1836, 4 late. However, that's after it left Neath 1843, so you are entitled to think the system has got mixed up. The departure time of the continuing part of the train is 1908, agreeing with RTT» (Real Time Trains - website).

I suspect a conflict between different data feeds. Livetrain has "TRUST (Train Running System TOPS) Event Data" as its heading, while RTT shows "TD(C6)" (i.e. train describer data) for its times. GWR (Great Western Railway) may be using this Open Rail software as a simple tool, or internal access to TRUST, with similar results. RTT would not be much use to them because of its limited history. They ought not to need "amateur" open data service at all, so it's probably a case of relying of TRUST data. But you need a real expert in this to identify the real answer.
Logged
Hafren
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 300


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 18, 2023, 15:56:07 »

I take it this was 1B21 on 13/6/23. Liverail/Livetrain (or Open Rail) does indeed show it as arriving SWA» (Swansea - next trains) 1836, 4 late. However, that's after it left Neath 1843, so you are entitled to think the system has got mixed up. The departure time of the continuing part of the train is 1908, agreeing with RTT» (Real Time Trains - website).

I suspect a conflict between different data feeds. Livetrain has "TRUST (Train Running System TOPS) Event Data" as its heading, while RTT shows "TD(C6)" (i.e. train describer data) for its times. GWR (Great Western Railway) may be using this Open Rail software as a simple tool, or internal access to TRUST, with similar results. RTT would not be much use to them because of its limited history. They ought not to need "amateur" open data service at all, so it's probably a case of relying of TRUST data. But you need a real expert in this to identify the real answer.

That's useful to know. Now the appeal is done I have to follow complaint procedure, but hopefully if a human looks into it properly they can see there's unrealistic data. I'll present a screenshot of RTT (live data will expire soon) – might not be "admissible" but at least as evidence to say there's an error to investigate. Part of me says forget it for £1.25, but I have a thing about companies giving false information, and not correcting it when given the opportunity.

I note on RTT that a London train left SWA P3 at 18:28, then the stock from an earlier arrival was presumably shunted back in to form the 19:23. Perhaps that shunt arrived at 18:36, and for some reason the wrong headcode was entered. In the RTT world, the arrival of the real train would override that, but maybe internal systems work differently. Not particularly relevant to the claim, but satisfying curiosity as to how something happened can make it more palatable!
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12368


View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: June 18, 2023, 16:42:48 »

I have to say that I thought you could only claim for the delay to the service you actually travel on, ...

No, Chris.  I works for connections too.  I've been on a train delayed by 10 minutes which failed to make an "advertised" connection into an hourly ongoing service.  Waited around for an hour for the next ongoing train, which was 5 minutes late.     Maximum delay to services - 10 minutes, no repay.  Delay to journey - 65 minutes, so repay for over an hour.   Or perhaps I'm on GWR (Great Western Railway) file as being an honest but awkward bugger and that helps them make their decision.

Agree wholeheartedly Graham, and I am aware - but this wasn't a connection.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40856



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #7 on: June 18, 2023, 17:13:39 »

I have to say that I thought you could only claim for the delay to the service you actually travel on, ...

No, Chris.  I works for connections too.  I've been on a train delayed by 10 minutes which failed to make an "advertised" connection into an hourly ongoing service.  Waited around for an hour for the next ongoing train, which was 5 minutes late.     Maximum delay to services - 10 minutes, no repay.  Delay to journey - 65 minutes, so repay for over an hour.   Or perhaps I'm on GWR (Great Western Railway) file as being an honest but awkward bugger and that helps them make their decision.

Agree wholeheartedly Graham, and I am aware - but this wasn't a connection.

Fair enough - but your comment was a general one and I felt it needed clarifying for general and future readership.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page