Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:35 02 May 2024
- Protesters held as asylum seekers' transfer thwarted
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 18/05/24 - BRTA Westbury
22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber

On this day
2nd May (1999)
Last special train to Weymouth Quay (*)

Train RunningCancelled
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
20:50 Truro to Falmouth Docks
20:56 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
21:22 Falmouth Docks to Truro
21:59 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
22:30 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
23:30 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
Short Run
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:50 Penzance to Cardiff Central
17:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
17:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
17:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
17:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
18:18 London Paddington to Swansea
18:18 Carmarthen to London Paddington
18:23 Swansea to London Paddington
18:24 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
18:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
18:48 London Paddington to Swansea
18:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
19:14 Taunton to Cardiff Central
19:15 Penzance to Bristol Temple Meads
19:18 London Paddington to Swansea
19:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
19:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:48 London Paddington to Swansea
19:56 Cardiff Central to Taunton
20:23 Swansea to London Paddington
20:24 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
20:24 Exmouth to Cardiff Central
20:30 Carmarthen to Bristol Parkway
20:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
21:08 Paignton to Bristol Temple Meads
21:30 Cardiff Central to Frome
21:45 Penzance to London Paddington
21:48 London Paddington to Swansea
22:49 London Paddington to Swansea
Delayed
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 18:22 Bristol Temple Meads to Portsmouth Harbour
20:48 London Paddington to Swansea
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 22:42 Exeter St Davids to Bristol Temple Meads
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 02, 2024, 20:44:17 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[260] Vintage film - how valid are these issues today?
[80] Rail unions strike action 2022/2023/2024
[46] Leven, Fife, Scotland, fast forward a month
[42] Train drivers "overwhelmingly white middle aged men"
[34] underground plans for Bristol update.
[34] Visiting the pub on the way home.
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 11
  Print  
Author Topic: Major delays/cancellations, Paddington to Reading, 20 December 2012 and ongoing ...  (Read 66752 times)
woody
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 525


View Profile
« Reply #90 on: December 23, 2012, 09:59:12 »

Just heard one of the two booms erected at Cowley Bridge by Network rail deflated and gave way but the other is still in place at the moment but its still more bad news sadly.
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4363


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #91 on: December 23, 2012, 10:00:34 »

God knows what Brunel would think....
I suspect that IKB (Isambard Kingdom Brunel), if alive, would be chuffed to see his railway still doing sterling service...

Also IKB did not always produce the most reliable bits of kit his locomotive were not reliable at all
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40851



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #92 on: December 23, 2012, 10:08:55 »

God knows what Brunel would think....
I suspect that IKB (Isambard Kingdom Brunel), if alive, would be chuffed to see his railway still doing sterling service...
Also IKB did not always produce the most reliable bits of kit his locomotive were not reliable at all

He would probably be chuffed to see so many trains and so fast.  Looking at London to Bristol, in 1895 there were around 12 trains - from 135 minutes (for a nonstop service that went on to Cornwall). In 1949 there were 14 trains ranging from around 135 minutes for the journey upwards. There are now 33, many of them taking 100 minutes. By 2020, there should be nearly 60 trains, and there's an estimated journey time of 80 minutes.

Victorian Railways had their fair share of accidents, crises and the like - there are tales of station lockouts when too many people showed up for the trains the first time that the Derby was run after the opening of a station at Epsom, for example, so I suspect that IKB wouldn't have let a few problems like the ones we've had in the last week stop his quest.  But I do suspect he would have asked "how can we prevent this problem next time"?  And - yes - some of the early locos were distinctly naff;  that's what comes from being at the (b)leeding edge of technology.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Andy W
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 267



View Profile Email
« Reply #93 on: December 23, 2012, 11:06:03 »

And - yes - some of the early locos were distinctly naff;  that's what comes from being at the (b)leeding edge of technology.

Maybe (b)bleeding edge then - State of the Ark now.
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4363


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #94 on: December 23, 2012, 17:55:56 »

And - yes - some of the early locos were distinctly naff;  that's what comes from being at the (b)leeding edge of technology.

Maybe (b)bleeding edge then - State of the Ark now.
Some of the kit being installed now is leading edge or at least very modern, have you seen the new LED tilt over signals being installed on the main running lines through Ealing and Acton,  all the new trough routes being installed around Maidenhead to Hayes if for resignalling which will support ETRMS level 2
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7805



View Profile
« Reply #95 on: December 23, 2012, 19:46:13 »

..............so why can't all this "leading edge" technology cope with the vagaries of weather? I don't mean floods, no-one can legislate for that, I just mean a bit of frost, heat, snow, ice or leaves?

Personally I think Brunel would be very disappointed that over a 100 years later we still can't cope with the basics, with all the technology we have available, that he could only dream of....then again he was a real engineer.
Logged
rogerw
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1345



View Profile
« Reply #96 on: December 23, 2012, 20:00:27 »

The airlines don't cope any better at times.  I had the misfortune to be attempting to fly out of Heathrow last February when the snow arrived.  British Airways just gave up, cancelling over 95% of their flights from terminal 5 which looked more like a refugee camp than an air terminal.  Thankfully someone else was sorting out my flights and I finally flew out with United on a half empty plane 7^ after my scheduled departure.  If it had been left to BA» (British Airways - about) I would not have left that day and would have missed the boat (literally) at New York.
Logged

I like to travel.  It lets me feel I'm getting somewhere.
BerkshireBugsy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1640


Berkshire Bugsy Jr


View Profile
« Reply #97 on: December 23, 2012, 20:01:27 »

I don't claim to be an expert but I suspect that there are some weather related issues which may be difficult to address

I remember (I think it was 2003) the temperatures here in the uk the tracks got so hot they expanded and services were disrupted as a result. I know this has happened at least once since but given that metal has this habit of expanding when heated this could be a bit difficult to sort

On my recent journeys, when it has been very cold, the services have had problems with "rail head adhesion". The experts out there may be able to offer hope on this one but as of nowim not aware of a solution.

As a frequent traveller I am (sadly) resigned to the fact there are a couple of months a year when train travel can be problematic but I don't remember it being ths bad before.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7805



View Profile
« Reply #98 on: December 23, 2012, 20:17:54 »

Heat - Australian Railways seem to manage OK..."very cold....rail head adhesion".....ever heard of the Trans Siberian?
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4363


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #99 on: December 23, 2012, 20:38:28 »

Heat - Australian Railways seem to manage OK..."very cold....rail head adhesion".....ever heard of the Trans Siberian?

Neither of which operate the traffic densities of the GWML (Great Western Main Line).

There have been 2 major incidents one on top of the other, the equipment failure in the Acton and Hayes area I will try to find out what the post mortem is on this when I get back to work in the New Year; the other is flooding which is Force Majeure the floods have also effected many many local roads in the same area.

The Railway system is very complex a system that gets going every morning literally from a standing start at 04:30 and within 2 hours is operating one of the most intense service in the world.   The Railway system is both technological and human, the human interaction is complex.  The Railway system is risk adverse which means a small thing will cause it to stop it is this way to prevent us killing people.

Every Railwayman and Railwaywomen I ever come across whether they are TOC (Train Operating Company) FOC (Freight Operating Company) NR» (Network Rail - home page) or contractor; front of house or behind the scenes are very dedicated to what they do and work very hard to reduce failures and to improve reliability.
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
old original
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 880


View Profile
« Reply #100 on: December 23, 2012, 21:10:52 »

Heat - Australian Railways seem to manage OK..."very cold....rail head adhesion".....ever heard of the Trans Siberian?

Neither of which operate the traffic densities of the GWML (Great Western Main Line).

There have been 2 major incidents one on top of the other, the equipment failure in the Acton and Hayes area I will try to find out what the post mortem is on this when I get back to work in the New Year; the other is flooding which is Force Majeure the floods have also effected many many local roads in the same area.

The Railway system is very complex a system that gets going every morning literally from a standing start at 04:30 and within 2 hours is operating one of the most intense service in the world.   The Railway system is both technological and human, the human interaction is complex.  The Railway system is risk adverse which means a small thing will cause it to stop it is this way to prevent us killing people.

Every Railwayman and Railwaywomen I ever come across whether they are TOC (Train Operating Company) FOC (Freight Operating Company) NR» (Network Rail - home page) or contractor; front of house or behind the scenes are very dedicated to what they do and work very hard to reduce failures and to improve reliability.

+1
Logged

8 Billion people on a wet rock - of course we're not happy
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #101 on: December 23, 2012, 23:11:28 »

..............so why can't all this "leading edge" technology cope with the vagaries of weather? I don't mean floods, no-one can legislate for that, I just mean a bit of frost, heat, snow, ice or leaves?

Personally I think Brunel would be very disappointed that over a 100 years later we still can't cope with the basics, with all the technology we have available, that he could only dream of....then again he was a real engineer.

As others have pointed out, safety is paramount. It's only 25 years since 4 people died when a bridge collapsed on the Heart of Wales line as a train was going over a very swollen river ( a couple of days after the hurricane). 

As with most things in life, there's a trade off between the additional expense in engineering things to deal with the most extreme of conditions, and the inconvenience of when those conditions happen. (The best example of this is the criticism when it snows that Sweden is geared up to cope with such conditions, so why can't we be,forgetting that in Sweden it's the norm, so the expensive equipment is more easily justified.  And it's not only the state that makes such decisions. At a personal level, how many of us buy and fit winter tyres or snow chains?)

However, I've no doubt that recent events will result in a reconsideration of some clear weak points given the apparent increase in flooding related incidents across the country in recent years.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10124


View Profile
« Reply #102 on: December 23, 2012, 23:31:12 »

At a personal level, how many of us buy and fit winter tyres or snow chains?)

Funny how the adverts on TV and in the papers from last year for snow tyres have gone away this year when severe winter snowfall starts to seem a distant memory again.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
johoare
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2818


View Profile
« Reply #103 on: December 23, 2012, 23:39:00 »


Huge mistakes were made.  Funnily enough, the local service out of Paddington was just about spot on in principle given the number of paths available, but several trains were running around as 2-cars.  To suggest that three is the maximum length doesn't cut the mustard with me I'm afraid.  They should all have been 6-car (or 5-car at the very least).  Should Appleford or Culham get in the way then there's time to lock/unlock the other portion at Didcot with no/minimal delay - it happens daily on a couple of scheduled services.  Or cancel the stops at Appleford and Culham and run a shuttle 2-car Turbo service, or buses/taxis. 

The priority is maximising the seating for available paths during disruption like that...

Indeed (with apologies to IndustryInsider for quoting part of his post only). I would still really like to know (from someone with inside knowledge?), where the rest of the trains/carriages were that could have been forming longer trains during the disruption? Displaced trains (which I was told) just makes no sense knowing how many 5 or 6 carriage trains run up and down that line during peak times.. This was off peak after all..  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10124


View Profile
« Reply #104 on: December 24, 2012, 00:43:45 »

Indeed (with apologies to IndustryInsider for quoting part of his post only). I would still really like to know (from someone with inside knowledge?), where the rest of the trains/carriages were that could have been forming longer trains during the disruption? Displaced trains (which I was told) just makes no sense knowing how many 5 or 6 carriage trains run up and down that line during peak times.. This was off peak after all..  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

There were no shortage of sets stabled in Reading fuel point as I went past around noon on Friday - probably about ten at a guess.  Not all would have been available for use, but I bet a fair few of them would have been.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 11
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page