|
XPT
|
 |
« on: April 26, 2010, 22:55:22 » |
|
Looking back at some of the old FGW▸ liveries I notice they changed liveries about every 3 years. The current liveries have been about since 2006. So is a new livery change due soon?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
inspector_blakey
|
|
« Reply #1 on: April 26, 2010, 23:18:17 » |
|
ALmost certainly not. They've not long finished painting the whole fleet in the current livery. Changes in the past have coincided with franchise changes or changes in First's corporate identity.
Why on earth when the whole fleet looks "corporate" in the new colours, with paint that should be good for several years, would a company waste money re-painting everything?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
XPT
|
|
« Reply #2 on: April 27, 2010, 00:02:27 » |
|
Yes looking at it that way, it would be a waste of money repainting all their trains. It's just that the livery seems to have been about for a fair old while now, and previous to the current livery they seemed to change their livery more frequently. Personally I preferred their old Barbie livery to their current one.
With FGW▸ possibly* losing their franchise in 2013(I thought it was 2016, so to read of 2013 was a surprise), it wouldn't be sensible to spend/waste money on a new livery yet. Leave it till 2013 and see if they keep the franchise....
* chances are they will keep it though. I'd be amazed if another operator ever took over now!
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 27, 2010, 00:17:33 by XPT »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Super Guard
|
|
« Reply #3 on: April 27, 2010, 10:40:11 » |
|
2013 is the minimum, with a possible extension possible until 2016.
I think most would agree the current livery looks quite smart and wouldn't need changing even in 2013 if the franchise was extended/renewed/renegotiated?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Any opinions made on this forum are purely personal and my own. I am in no way speaking for, or offering the views of First Great Western or First Group.
If my employer feels I have broken any aspect of the Social Media Policy, please PM me immediately, so I can rectify without delay.
|
|
|
|
Tim
|
|
« Reply #4 on: April 27, 2010, 11:37:22 » |
|
I agree, but who knows who will be running the franchise in 2014. It could be First but who would have though just afew years agothat NX would be out of the picture completely?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
|
« Reply #5 on: April 27, 2010, 12:17:33 » |
|
I'm sure the DafT will change franchisee anyway, nothing like wasting money!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #6 on: April 27, 2010, 14:59:47 » |
|
The FGW▸ franchise was for 7 or 10 years as I recall, with the bulk of the franchise payments to the government in the last 3 years. It's First's decision as to whether they want the final three years; with (on one hand) the downturn on the economy (on a second hand) continued growth well above forecast on some routes and (on the third hand) a chance to rebid at a lower price and still beat Stagecoach and Arriva Db, it will be interesting to see which way they go.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
|
|
|
|
John R
|
|
« Reply #7 on: April 27, 2010, 15:36:02 » |
|
It's worth noting that it was only this weekend that the last refurbished or rebuilt buffet cars were due to enter service (according to my sources). That's four years after the franchise started. Although in fairness, this does represent an improvement over what was originally envisaged (some 2+7 with no buffet).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Tim
|
|
« Reply #8 on: April 27, 2010, 17:07:18 » |
|
It's worth noting that it was only this weekend that the last refurbished or rebuilt buffet cars were due to enter service (according to my sources). That's four years after the franchise started. Although in fairness, this does represent an improvement over what was originally envisaged (some 2+7 with no buffet).
Are there enough spare MkIIIs around to add one to each train if at some future date overcrowding requires it and a franchise specification includes it? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
matt473
|
|
« Reply #9 on: April 27, 2010, 17:19:16 » |
|
Quite simply First will not change the brand as post refurb/refresh along with the sorting out of the majority of stock problems, they seem to be doing well and the livery on the train is all part of the brand. Unless there was a major problem then there is no need to re-brand the company unless there are obvious problems as it is not only a waste of money but ruining a brand that the livery is part of.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
JayMac
|
|
« Reply #10 on: April 27, 2010, 18:30:07 » |
|
Post deleted....wrong board. Dunno quite how that happened - although I was disturbed by a Tory party candidate knocking on the door earlier. Very disturbed....
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 27, 2010, 21:48:30 by bignosemac »
|
Logged
|
"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
- Sir Terry Pratchett.
|
|
|
|
The SprinterMeister
|
|
« Reply #11 on: April 27, 2010, 19:02:43 » |
|
I agree, but who knows who will be running the franchise in 2014. It could be First but who would have though just afew years agothat NX would be out of the picture completely? Which thankfully means no going back to a Wessex Trains style operation with a bewildering selection of lurid colours and virtually a bespoke livery on each & every vehicle. What a Fred Carno outfit it looked.....  (with thanks to the WNXX▸ forum for the loan of the puke emoticon). |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Trundling gently round the SW
|
|
|
|
John R
|
|
« Reply #12 on: April 27, 2010, 19:22:47 » |
|
It's worth noting that it was only this weekend that the last refurbished or rebuilt buffet cars were due to enter service (according to my sources). That's four years after the franchise started. Although in fairness, this does represent an improvement over what was originally envisaged (some 2+7 with no buffet).
Are there enough spare MkIIIs around to add one to each train if at some future date overcrowding requires it and a franchise specification includes it? I seem to recall that 2+9 would be an expensive operation, as the depots would need to be extended. But still probably a bit cheaper than IEP▸ . |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
IndustryInsider
|
|
« Reply #13 on: April 27, 2010, 21:44:11 » |
|
Lengthening all or some of the 2+7's to 2+8's would go some way to alleviating the summer weekend crush down to Devon and Cornwall though as the extra 80 or so standard class seats would come in very useful.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
To view my GWML▸ Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/ |
|
|
|
|
|
