Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 08:35 02 May 2024
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 18/05/24 - BRTA Westbury
22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber

On this day
2nd May (1999)
Last special train to Weymouth Quay (*)

Train RunningCancelled
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
06:37 Plymouth to London Paddington
07:33 Weymouth to Gloucester
09:23 London Paddington to Oxford
11:00 Oxford to London Paddington
Short Run
06:38 Weymouth to Gloucester
06:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
07:13 Great Malvern to London Paddington
08:18 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
11:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
Delayed
06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
06:43 Worcester Shrub Hill to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 02, 2024, 08:44:34 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[122] Train drivers "overwhelmingly white middle aged men"
[97] Visiting the pub on the way home.
[69] Leven, Fife, Scotland, fast forward a month
[53] Vintage film - how valid are these issues today?
[36] underground plans for Bristol update.
[25] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
  Print  
Author Topic: Seven Year Old Girl Crushed On Overcrowded Train  (Read 15679 times)
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #30 on: January 27, 2008, 09:12:57 »


On the other hand, I may have completely misunderstood your point - in which case, sorry!   Wink

Understood me perfectly well  Smiley
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: January 27, 2008, 09:59:10 »

Couple of observations. Firstly, the evening services are constrained in that they have to fit around the timings of the XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) services (as well as the Weston single line). If the 1725 set off any later it would hold up the 1744 XC service by the time it got to Worle. So I think there are real difficulties in getting a more even pattern in the way that the morning service achieves.

Secondly, in the morning HSTs (High Speed Train) run every half hour, by virtue of being able to position themselves in time when they otherwise would not be used ie early morning (or running up from the South West). This isn't possible in the evening, as they need to turn around at BTM (Bristol Temple Meads (strictly, it should be BRI)) to run back to London (or else more sets would be needed). So there is much less capacity in the evening than in the morning.

They've recently switched the services that carry on to Weston from the 00 departure ex Paddington to the 30 departure (and added an additional service by the way, so we now have 6 hourly depatures from 1430 to 1930). Effect is that HSTs now leave BTM at around 15 instead of 45.

I think the 1753 just about copes (I tried to count the number waiting one evening, and it seemed consistent with the number standing once on board), but any further increase in passenger volumes will leave this service prone to excessive overcrowding.
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #32 on: January 27, 2008, 16:36:53 »

Prehaps the DAFT should decree NOW that London Midland MUST use the 180s untill there new stuff is built ,and cascade the 3 car 150s to FGW (First Great Western) NOW
Now theres an idea! That would really help things out at the moment. I think its crazy that the 180s are heading towards the sidings whilst passengers are crammed into two car trains. Problem is this is too much like common sense for it to happen but we live in hope! Still prefer to see the 180s on the Cardiff-Portsmouth line though despite their costs I think you would encourage more to travel on this line if they knew they would actually get a seat on the train.


Not good. The 180s would have huge loading times on the Snow Hill lines (commuter). They are too long for Harlebury station.

Also, the 150s are going to Northern, not FGW.

Keep the 180s on the Cotswold Line, or give them to Chiltern and release some 168s for LM (London Midland - recent franchise), to release 150s for FGW.
Logged
Shazz
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 534


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: January 27, 2008, 16:44:36 »

Prehaps the DAFT should decree NOW that London Midland MUST use the 180s untill there new stuff is built ,and cascade the 3 car 150s to FGW (First Great Western) NOW
Now theres an idea! That would really help things out at the moment. I think its crazy that the 180s are heading towards the sidings whilst passengers are crammed into two car trains. Problem is this is too much like common sense for it to happen but we live in hope! Still prefer to see the 180s on the Cardiff-Portsmouth line though despite their costs I think you would encourage more to travel on this line if they knew they would actually get a seat on the train.


Not good. The 180s would have huge loading times on the Snow Hill lines (commuter). They are too long for Harlebury station.

Also, the 150s are going to Northern, not FGW.

Keep the 180s on the Cotswold Line, or give them to Chiltern and release some 168s for LM (London Midland - recent franchise), to release 150s for FGW.

the 3 cars maybe.

but as far as i'm aware theres a contract signed and sealed for 10 or so 2 car 150's to go to FGW

Maybe vacman/ollie can shed some more light on this
Logged
smokey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1129


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: January 27, 2008, 16:53:35 »

Prehaps the DAFT should decree NOW that London Midland MUST use the 180s untill there new stuff is built ,and cascade the 3 car 150s to FGW (First Great Western) NOW
Now theres an idea! That would really help things out at the moment. I think its crazy that the 180s are heading towards the sidings whilst passengers are crammed into two car trains. Problem is this is too much like common sense for it to happen but we live in hope! Still prefer to see the 180s on the Cardiff-Portsmouth line though despite their costs I think you would encourage more to travel on this line if they knew they would actually get a seat on the train.


168 are Thames Turbo's are they not?

The Thames Turbo being wider than other stock are never likely to move away from Paddington Services.

Not good. The 180s would have huge loading times on the Snow Hill lines (commuter). They are too long for Harlebury station.

Also, the 150s are going to Northern, not FGW.

Keep the 180s on the Cotswold Line, or give them to Chiltern and release some 168s for LM (London Midland - recent franchise), to release 150s for FGW.
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #35 on: January 27, 2008, 17:21:24 »

168s are Clubmans and they are also Turbostars.

The earlier batch LOOK (from the outside) like a Thames Turbo, inside like a Turbostar. The later batch have the Turbostar look outside as well!

Chiltern do operate Thames Turbos too.
Logged
smokey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1129


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: January 27, 2008, 17:35:23 »

The Safety Issue with overcrowded trains is a bit strange, OK we all would like to have a seat in a train.

Yet in a Crash, a busy train well loaded is sometimes safer than a lightly loaded train, put a strawberry or 6 in a Jam Jar put lid on and shake it about, result a Mess. Now fill a Jam Jar with Strawberries lid on and shake it about, because it's tighly packed little damage occurs.

However if this 7 year old had been crushed on the Branstaple-Exeter train that was 2x142 units with one packed and the other Empty because of H & S issues, the Media would have HUNG the safety lobby OUT TO DRY.
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #37 on: January 27, 2008, 17:39:08 »

Don't like your logic.

if people are stood up, they are thrown around. They might also be standing in the crumple zone of the train.

The main reason why only one person died in the Lake District crash last year, was that the train was not overcrowded, and everyone was seated.
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #38 on: January 27, 2008, 17:51:42 »

Pacers are useless though, most of the train is a crumple zone!
Logged
smokey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1129


View Profile
« Reply #39 on: January 27, 2008, 18:01:13 »

Pacers are useless though, most of the train is a crumple zone!

More like a Fly Off Zone, leave the Chassis and Wheels behind!! Shocked
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #40 on: January 27, 2008, 18:28:14 »

yep

http://mark5811.fotopic.net/p10570452.html
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #41 on: February 20, 2008, 11:40:43 »

There's a letter in this month's Modern Railways mentioning this incident and generally bemoaning the reduction from 3 to 2 coaches on the line.
Logged
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #42 on: February 20, 2008, 12:10:48 »

There's a letter in this month's Modern Railways mentioning this incident and generally bemoaning the reduction from 3 to 2 coaches on the line.
Lets hope they do become 3 cars from May then!
Logged
Steve44
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 100

I quite like thames turbos...


View Profile
« Reply #43 on: February 20, 2008, 18:21:19 »

I've used this service from Bath to Pompey before a few times, and one time it said on the board before the train had arrived that it was reported to be overcrowded.. but there was no resolution or any extra transport laid on.  If they knew this service was so busy, why was it reduced to one an hour? I don't understand the logic, is there an answer?
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6299


View Profile
« Reply #44 on: February 20, 2008, 18:34:04 »

I've used this service from Bath to Pompey before a few times, and one time it said on the board before the train had arrived that it was reported to be overcrowded.. but there was no resolution or any extra transport laid on.  If they knew this service was so busy, why was it reduced to one an hour? I don't understand the logic, is there an answer?
Cardiff-Portsmouth has always been hourly since 1988. The recent overcrowding problems started when DFT (Department for Transport)/FGW (First Great Western) reduced the fleet of three car 158s back to two cars and its been chaos 7 days a week ever since on a great deal of services that are not operated either by the sole three car 158 or services which are operated as four car and thats not many, only during 'peak' commuting time Mon-Fri.

Weekends have seen the worst overcrowding because of the less frequent timetable which makes it all the more annoying when you see empty sets sitting in the sidings which could be used to lengthen services  Angry

Once again I do say that overcrowding happened on this line under the Wales and West and Wessex Trains franchises but thats why Wessex made some of their fleet of 158s three carriages to help relieve the problem.

The good news is that three car 158s are making a comeback. See:
http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=1670.msg12673#msg12673
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page