Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 21:35 02 May 2024
- Protesters held as asylum seekers' transfer thwarted
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 18/05/24 - BRTA Westbury
22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber

On this day
2nd May (1859)
Wilton South station opened

Train RunningCancelled
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
20:56 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
21:22 Falmouth Docks to Truro
21:59 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
22:30 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
23:30 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
Short Run
16:50 Penzance to Cardiff Central
17:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
17:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
18:18 London Paddington to Swansea
18:18 Carmarthen to London Paddington
18:23 Swansea to London Paddington
18:24 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
18:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
18:48 London Paddington to Swansea
18:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
19:15 Penzance to Bristol Temple Meads
19:18 London Paddington to Swansea
19:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:48 London Paddington to Swansea
19:56 Cardiff Central to Taunton
20:23 Swansea to London Paddington
20:30 Carmarthen to Bristol Parkway
20:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
21:08 Paignton to Bristol Temple Meads
21:30 Cardiff Central to Frome
21:45 Penzance to London Paddington
Delayed
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
19:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
20:24 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
20:24 Exmouth to Cardiff Central
20:48 London Paddington to Swansea
21:48 London Paddington to Swansea
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 22:42 Exeter St Davids to Bristol Temple Meads
22:49 London Paddington to Swansea
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 02, 2024, 21:39:53 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[260] Vintage film - how valid are these issues today?
[80] Rail unions strike action 2022/2023/2024
[46] Leven, Fife, Scotland, fast forward a month
[42] Train drivers "overwhelmingly white middle aged men"
[34] underground plans for Bristol update.
[34] Visiting the pub on the way home.
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17 18 ... 41
  Print  
Author Topic: Campaign for Tavistock reopening  (Read 298180 times)
34104
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 128


View Profile
« Reply #225 on: November 04, 2009, 11:20:10 »

Those following the Tavistock reopening initiative may be interested to learn that there has been a management buyout at Kilbride, taking in the various rail projects, including the Bere Alston-Tavistock initiative. here's the press release: 

http://www.kilbridegroup.com/docs/view_news.asp?nid=48

Does anyone have any info on what's happening on the ground?

Its been pretty quiet for a month or two.The Tavvy Times had a report a couple of weeks ago that Mr Frost of Kilbride had been in discussion with Calstock council about where the proposals would leave the branch to Gunnislake,but nothing definite was forthcoming,still under discussion.There's been no further clearance work undertaken recently either,so not much to report there,either. Hopefully the buy out at Kilbride will not adversely affect the scheme,judging by the press release,it would appear not.
Logged
mjthomson
Newbie
*
Posts: 4


View Profile Email
« Reply #226 on: November 04, 2009, 18:02:55 »

100% agree with the re-opening of the Tavistock line. When you think back 40 years or so Tavistock had both a GWR (Great Western Railway) station and a Southern railway connection. Since then it has substantially increased in size and traffic on the A386 into Plymouth has been very heavy. Come on DfT» (Department for Transport - about) and the Government do what you said in 1997 when you were elected and take traffic off the road and invest in our railways.
Logged
woody
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 525


View Profile
« Reply #227 on: December 21, 2009, 09:52:04 »

The railway line was a victim of the Beeching 'axe' of the 1960s.

"It's a long process. We are hoping that the construction programme will start in 2013," Mr Frost said.

"The actual construction work will only take about nine months, depending on what time of year we start.

"Before that we have to get through the legal process to reinstate the line."

Kilbride has done numerous transport schemes around the country, specialising in rail freight until recently.
http://www.thisisplymouth.co.uk/news/Tavistock-rail-link-track-2014-start/article-1627921-detail/article.html
Logged
woody
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 525


View Profile
« Reply #228 on: December 21, 2009, 09:54:11 »

The railway line was a victim of the Beeching 'axe' of the 1960s.

"It's a long process. We are hoping that the construction programme will start in 2013," Mr Frost said.

"The actual construction work will only take about nine months, depending on what time of year we start.

"Before that we have to get through the legal process to reinstate the line."

Kilbride has done numerous transport schemes around the country, specialising in rail freight until recently.
http://www.thisisplymouth.co.uk/news/Tavistock-rail-link-track-2014-start/article-1627921-detail/article.html
Logged
FlyingDutchman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 137


View Profile
« Reply #229 on: December 22, 2009, 13:25:49 »

Why are some partys more against the railways the other
Logged
34104
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 128


View Profile
« Reply #230 on: April 22, 2010, 11:02:55 »

Thanks for the update, John.  Sounds very different from when I was along there - really good stuff.

Good too to hear about the work around Gawton Bridge - when I did my walk four years or so ago, the trackbed was pretty impenetrable around there - lots of brambles etc but the ballast appeared to have just been left when the track was lifted.  I hadn't noticed much ballast on the section from the missing bridge to Shillamill so the fact you can now I think indicates just how much has been done.

In terms of timescales, with the end of the consultation period, I believe West Devon BC will agree their final Local Development Framework for submission to the Secretary of State some time during the Autumn.  I think people are expecting that the Secretary of State will order what is called an "Examination in Public" of the Local Development Framework sometime in the Spring with the Inspector's decision, I'm guessing, by the Summer.

If all goes in favour of the Kilbride proposal, and barring anything unforeseen, I would expect that Kilbride would be looking to submit their Transport & Works Act Order application early in 2011.

The key thing is that everything is still moving forward.

Cheers,

Richard

More news from the Tavistock times today:



http://www.tavistock-today.co.uk/tn/news.cfm?id=14178&headline=Blueprint for town gets the green light

Looks like matters are slightly behind schedule but now progressing as outlined in Richard's post above.One thing crossed my mind-would a change of government affect the situation? The plans are now going to the Secretary of State for approval,would a SoS of a different political hue look at the plan less favourably? Certainly hope not,if the LibDems have any influence it won't be any different,not sure what the Tories would do.
« Last Edit: April 22, 2010, 11:28:59 by 34104 » Logged
woody
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 525


View Profile
« Reply #231 on: April 23, 2010, 22:25:46 »

Would not think a change of government would change anything as the ^18.5million cost of the scheme is being met from a levy on the associated 750 housing scheme next to the new Tavistock station and not the public purse.
Logged
34104
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 128


View Profile
« Reply #232 on: April 25, 2010, 18:58:48 »

Would not think a change of government would change anything as the ^18.5million cost of the scheme is being met from a levy on the associated 750 housing scheme next to the new Tavistock station and not the public purse.

Thats the element i was really referring to,the building of 750 homes in Tavistock,not so much the funding which ,as you say will come from the Kilbride scheme.If the new government were to put the brakes on new house building for whatever reason,then the scheme could be affected.I guess if the population is going to grow [not to mention all the other reasons for housing needs] and affordable housing has to be built anyway,it wouldn't matter which government was in power,needs must,so lets hope that the election makes no difference.I'm just wary of politicians,really!
Logged
woody
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 525


View Profile
« Reply #233 on: May 23, 2010, 07:56:34 »

Latest "Rail" magazine has an article regarding progress on the planned  Tavistock re-opening in 2014,still looks good at the moment.
  According to the "Rail" article the rail link has now been adopted in West Devons core planning strategy transforming it from "desirable" to "essential" infrastucture for the expansion of Tavistock.After six weeks of formal consultation West Devons Strategy will be submitted in July to the new secretary of state.A planning inspector will then conduct an enquiry into the strategy,and the Secretary of state will then decide on the inspectors report in spring 2011.Meanwhile Kilbride Group who are developing the project is starting work on the Transport and Works Act Order application,which hopefully will be submitted around the end of 2011,followed by a further enquiry into this application which should be determined 2012/2013.Finally a 9 month constrution period should see the start of rail services between Plymouth and Tavistock in 2014 if all goes according to plan.I say "If" because the Kilbride Group is funding the railway development by the sale of 750 new homes on the western side of Tavistock on a single site which is strongly opposed by some Tavistock residents.
Logged
Andy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 544



View Profile
« Reply #234 on: May 24, 2010, 10:10:19 »

Thanks for posting this good news. What with this and the plans for Okehampton, we could have 3/4 of a Devon circular railway up and running by 2015. 
Logged
34104
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 128


View Profile
« Reply #235 on: June 03, 2010, 14:53:59 »

Could be a snag on the horizon.The new government has issued a letter to councils stating that the housing targets imposed by the previous government are no longer to be regarded as compulsory and that local core strategies can be torn up and housing needs reassessed if the council thinks appropriate.Much has been made of this in the Tavistock Times today,the chairman of WDBC says they would be  happy to look again at housing needs again,the chairman of the planning committee says that they will continue to promote the core strategy proposals in place,which actually seems to be a bit of "not singing from the same hymnsheet" by WDBC.No doubt a lot of discussion will take place in due course,my fear is that if the housing target is reduced to any great degree,then Kilbrides interest in the project may wane correspondingly and we would be back to square one as far as funding the project is concerned.Maybe the Libdems could bring some influence to bear as they have stated,in their election manifesto, that they would have supplied a pot of money for reopening railways should they have been elected.Lets hope that the project is not jeopardised by the change in policy,we shall see.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40851



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #236 on: June 03, 2010, 15:00:49 »

Could be a snag on the horizon.The new government has issued a letter to councils stating that the housing targets imposed by the previous government are no longer to be regarded as compulsory and that local core strategies can be torn up and housing needs reassessed if the council thinks appropriate ...

Comment in Wiltshire (not Devon / Tavistock) that actually they'll probably only make tiny adjustments - "so much has been put into putting it all together, and it's basically a good strategy ...".   Perhaps the same applies to Devon, or were the extra houses forced onto an unwilling Council in them parts?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
34104
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 128


View Profile
« Reply #237 on: June 04, 2010, 10:06:56 »

Could be a snag on the horizon.The new government has issued a letter to councils stating that the housing targets imposed by the previous government are no longer to be regarded as compulsory and that local core strategies can be torn up and housing needs reassessed if the council thinks appropriate ...

Comment in Wiltshire (not Devon / Tavistock) that actually they'll probably only make tiny adjustments - "so much has been put into putting it all together, and it's basically a good strategy ...".   Perhaps the same applies to Devon, or were the extra houses forced onto an unwilling Council in them parts?

Probably no more forced than in Wiltshire,although there has been a lot of public opposition to the plan to build 750 houses,understandably so. Hopefully the WDBC will also ultimately back their own plan,although i understand that one council in Oxfordshire has already torn up their core strategy,so there is a precedence for a U turn.Way to go yet,and i suppose there is always the question of whether the S of S would actually approve the strategy.No doubt the local press will be debating the issue fully in the next few weeks and months,i will post if any developments are forthcoming.
Logged
Andy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 544



View Profile
« Reply #238 on: June 04, 2010, 15:53:19 »

I think there was a significant minority that was opposed to the house-building part but the rail reopening was generally welcomed.  Apart from the fact that the whole plan is area's in the core strategy, the reopening was also specifically mentioned in the Lib Dem manifesto and even the Tories have been more pro-rail of late than I can ever remember. 
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17900


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #239 on: September 19, 2010, 19:25:55 »

From the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page):

Quote
Public inquiry into Tavistock housing plans

A public inquiry is to take place in Tavistock over plans to build 750 properties.

West Devon Borough Council (WDBC) wants to complete housing targets set by the previous Labour government, including 750 properties in Crowndale Valley.

But some West Devon residents oppose the cluster of properties and are in support of a public inquiry.

The new coalition government said councils no longer had to meet previous targets and could make their own plans.

WDBC Chief Executive, David Incoll, said: "We either plan for the future in a logical way and direct development to what we think are the correct places for it to take place, or we lay ourselves open to developers. We know a lot of developers would like to build residential developments and large supermarkets in the area. And it would be an abdication of responsibility over the next 16 years to have no plan in place."

Plans for Crowndale Valley include new homes, a railway station and a rail line to Plymouth - all to be completed by 2026.

As part of the plans a relief road would also be built, which would run through the farm where Sir Francis Drake was born.

Ann Keelan, of Protect the Tavy Valley, said: "Sir Francis Drake's birthplace is potentially our most important heritage site. But we're not going to have much of an interpreted environment if it's surrounded by a housing estate."

The public inquiry will consider whether the housing levels set for west Devon under Labour are justified and consistent with local and central policy.
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17 18 ... 41
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page