Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 22:55 02 May 2024
- Protesters held as asylum seekers' transfer thwarted
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 18/05/24 - BRTA Westbury
22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber

On this day
2nd May (1859)
Royal Albert Bridge opens

Train RunningCancelled
21:59 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
22:30 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
Short Run
17:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
18:18 Carmarthen to London Paddington
18:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
19:15 Penzance to Bristol Temple Meads
19:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
19:48 London Paddington to Swansea
20:23 Swansea to London Paddington
20:30 Carmarthen to Bristol Parkway
20:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
21:08 Paignton to Bristol Temple Meads
21:30 Cardiff Central to Frome
21:45 Penzance to London Paddington
Delayed
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 22:42 Exeter St Davids to Bristol Temple Meads
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 02, 2024, 23:02:36 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[245] Vintage film - how valid are these issues today?
[75] Rail unions strike action 2022/2023/2024
[56] Severn Tunnel emergency closure, 2nd May 2024.
[43] Leven, Fife, Scotland, fast forward a month
[40] Train drivers "overwhelmingly white middle aged men"
[32] underground plans for Bristol update.
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: DfT confirms it will not implement overcrowding limits on busy services  (Read 1148 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40853



View Profile WWW Email
« on: December 13, 2017, 19:01:17 »



From Rail Technology Magazine

Quote

DfT» (Department for Transport - about) confirms it will not implement overcrowding limits on busy services

Rail minister Paul Maynard has confirmed that the government will not be introducing a maximum passenger limit for overcrowded trains.

Answering a written question from MP (Member of Parliament) Sharon Hodgson, Maynard said passengers prized the flexibility of the walk-on system of travel and the DfT had no intention of changing.

Hodgson asked the minister what assessment had been made of the potential merits of maximum occupancy limits on services.
Maynard replied: “One of the most popular features of the UK (United Kingdom) railways is that it’s a walk-on, or turn up and go service. This flexibility is much prized by passengers.

[article continues]
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4363


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 13, 2017, 21:08:53 »

Its nothing to do with "the passengers prized the flexibility of the walk-on system" more to do with DfT» (Department for Transport - about) not able to fund the capacity enhancements needed
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
CyclingSid
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1947


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 14, 2017, 10:27:11 »

Dredging an ageing memory, didn't the report after the Clapham crash say that overcrowding should be controlled?
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7805



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: December 14, 2017, 10:35:09 »

Its nothing to do with "the passengers prized the flexibility of the walk-on system" more to do with DfT» (Department for Transport - about) not able to fund the capacity enhancements needed

I wonder if passengers were asked whether they "prized the flexibility of the walk-on system" over the ability to travel in a safe environment where they were able to breathe and inhabit more than a postage stamp sized area of space rather than being crammed into unreliable cattle trucks, which they would prioritise?

In one of the wealthiest countries on the planet, with handsomely remunerated Industry Leaders, huge resources and workforces and sky high fares, surely it shouldn't be too much to ask to have both flexibility and safety and perhaps even a modicum of comfort?
Logged
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 14, 2017, 16:59:28 »

I certainly value the flexibility of a walk up system. 

I'd favour some overcrowding limits, but it depends what they are.

A limit which denies passengers the right to board when a service is overcrowded would not be welcome (bearing in mind that folk who don't want to board can always take the next service)

A limit which triggers some investment when regularly breached or financially incentivises the ToC to solve the problem might be a good idea. 
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page