Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
 Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 21:35 02 May 2024
- Protesters held as asylum seekers' transfer thwarted
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]		 18/05/24 - BRTA Westbury
22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber

On this day
2nd May (1859)
Wilton South station opened
Train RunningCancelled
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
20:56 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
21:22 Falmouth Docks to Truro
21:59 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
22:30 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
23:30 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
Short Run
16:50 Penzance to Cardiff Central
17:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
17:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
18:18 London Paddington to Swansea
18:18 Carmarthen to London Paddington
18:23 Swansea to London Paddington
18:24 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
18:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
18:48 London Paddington to Swansea
18:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
19:15 Penzance to Bristol Temple Meads
19:18 London Paddington to Swansea
19:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
19:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:48 London Paddington to Swansea
19:56 Cardiff Central to Taunton
20:23 Swansea to London Paddington
20:24 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
20:24 Exmouth to Cardiff Central
20:30 Carmarthen to Bristol Parkway
20:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
21:08 Paignton to Bristol Temple Meads
21:30 Cardiff Central to Frome
21:45 Penzance to London Paddington
21:48 London Paddington to Swansea
Delayed
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
20:48 London Paddington to Swansea
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 22:42 Exeter St Davids to Bristol Temple Meads
22:49 London Paddington to Swansea
•
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
•
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
•
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
•
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
•
Train companiesSelect from:
GWR
SWR
XC
Chiltern
TfL
TfW
WMR
Southern
• Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple Meads • Bath Spa • Chippenham • Swindon • Didcot Parkway • Reading • London Paddington • Melksham
Exeter St Davids • Taunton • Westbury • Trowbridge • Bristol Parkway • Cardiff Central • Oxford • Cheltenham Spa • Birmingham New Street
May 02, 2024, 21:36:02 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[260] Vintage film - how valid are these issues today?
[80] Rail unions strike action 2022/2023/2024
[46] Leven, Fife, Scotland, fast forward a month
[42] Train drivers "overwhelmingly white middle aged men"
[34] underground plans for Bristol update.
[34] Visiting the pub on the way home.
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Great Western Coffee Shop > Journey by Journey > North Downs Line > Monday 18th June Derailment at Depot near reading
Pages: [1]
« previous next »
  Print  
Author Topic: Monday 18th June Derailment at Depot near reading  (Read 7563 times)
BerkshireBugsy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1640


Berkshire Bugsy Jr


View Profile
« on: June 18, 2012, 07:36:31 »
Just curous about this. According the the link http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/service_disruptions/sad0d0a5840644d0ac7a919e082c826f/details.html it does not include services to and from Gatwick are not affected. Assuming it is Reading West that is affected why are services to Gatwick OK?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40851



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: June 18, 2012, 08:11:00 »
Gatwicks look OK, but there are cancellations on the North Downs:

07:21 Shalford to Reading due 08:17
08:20 Reading to Shalford due 09:11
09:31 Shalford to Reading due 10:17

Educated guess - priority goes to the all-the-way trains, with short workings cancelled when there's a lack of stock?
Logged
Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
amiddl
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 199


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 18, 2012, 08:39:51 »
Just seen it at reading one set of wheels off track and a very full yardof trains unable to get out.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5319


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 18, 2012, 09:43:13 »
Do they not outberth a few units at the other end of the Gatwick route, Redhill maybe? 

That's likely to be the reason why some services are (or were) operated by SN drivers...

Paul
Logged
BerkshireBugsy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1640


Berkshire Bugsy Jr


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 18, 2012, 09:46:04 »
Quote from: paul7755 on June 18, 2012, 09:43:13
Do they not outberth a few units at the other end of the Gatwick route, Redhill maybe? 

That's likely to be the reason why some services are (or were) operated by SN drivers...

Paul

Out of curiousity (because I would normally use this route on a Monday through Wednesday) I have just used journey planner to check times and all of the Reading-Gatwick services appear to be operating as normal.

Am I right in guess the derailment happened at the "worst" location in the depot - where all the sidings converge ready to join the normal (main) lines?
Logged
Southern Stag
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 984


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 18, 2012, 11:42:32 »
Quote from: paul7755 on June 18, 2012, 09:43:13
Do they not outberth a few units at the other end of the Gatwick route, Redhill maybe? 
Two units are outberthed at Redhill I believe. To operate all Reading-Gatwick services requires 3 units, and all Reading-Redhill an additional 3 units. So 4 units must have been available at Reading to be able to operate the bulk of the service.
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: June 20, 2012, 20:19:31 »
A good depot design should always have at least two exits Roll Eyes
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10124


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: June 21, 2012, 10:27:18 »
Quote from: SandTEngineer on June 20, 2012, 20:19:31
A good depot design should always have at least two exits Roll Eyes

Both Reading upper and lower depot's do have two exits, but the shape of the upper depot (basically a triangle) means that a derailment in the wrong place will block off most of the rest of the sidings.  I'm struggling to recall for definite but I think the new depot has three exit points (two from the outset and a third when the IEP▸ (Intercity Express Program / Project.) part is completed), so that along with its elongated shape should mean that a derailment won't have quite the same implications in the future.
Logged
To view my GWML▸ (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: June 21, 2012, 21:53:15 »
I know that.  What I meant was that the sidings themselves should not be single ended.  You are quite right that the new depot is to be double ended for this very reason.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
« previous next »
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of page • Jump to Forum Home Page