Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 17:15 03 May 2024
* Around-the-world cruise staff member missing at sea
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 18/05/24 - BRTA Westbury
22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber

On this day
3rd May (2018)
~ Just one working lower quadrant distant signal left (link)

Train RunningCancelled
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
17:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
Short Run
14:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:59 Westbury to Gloucester
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
17:55 Worcester Shrub Hill to Bristol Temple Meads
Delayed
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 15:48 Bristol Parkway to Weymouth
15:48 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
15:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
16:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 03, 2024, 17:34:58 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[185] Severn Tunnel emergency closure, 2nd May 2024.
[93] June to December 2024 Timetables
[66] Vintage film - how valid are these issues today?
[56] 2024 Delays and Cancellations - North Cotswold Line
[46] Reopening Cullompton and Wellington stations (merged topic)
[34] underground plans for Bristol update.
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: South Western Railway franchise could be under threat  (Read 1520 times)
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6299


View Profile
« on: July 24, 2018, 07:59:13 »

http://www.dorsetecho.co.uk/news/16372502.south-western-railway-franchise-could-be-under-threat/
Quote
Weymouth-Waterloo train operator South Western Railway is set to renegotiate its franchise position after less than a year of operation.

The move could threaten improvements to services and planned investments.

A document that has been filed with the Office of Rail and Road regulator, states that SWR» (South Western Railway - about) and Network Rail have clashed over several elements in the franchise including operational and financial implications of the scrapping of the proposed timetable changes due to be made in December which would have seen more seats and faster journeys between London Waterloo and Weymouth.
Continues...

Logged
JayMac
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 18928



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: July 24, 2018, 14:44:29 »

You read it here first:

http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=20060.msg241637#msg241637

 Smiley
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
bradshaw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1458



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: July 26, 2018, 10:18:57 »


This is a very good analysis of the SWR» (South Western Railway - about) problems

https://www.londonreconnections.com/2018/a-good-spark-is-getting-hard-to-find-swr-and-the-december-timetable/
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5416



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: July 26, 2018, 13:09:49 »

Which may be summarised as "largely due to network rail, but not entirely"

Even for network rail, upgrading the power supply along an existing route should not be that hard. There is an existing 33KV distribution network along the railway, this feeds numerous transformer/rectifier stations.

Additional transformers and rectifiers are mature technology and available from several suppliers.
If the existing 33KV network is inadequate, then replacing the cables with larger ones is a simple task. HV cable is used in vast quantities by the electricity supply industry and is readily available.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
WelshBluebird
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 158


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: July 26, 2018, 13:15:23 »

Which may be summarised as "largely due to network rail, but not entirely"

Even for network rail, upgrading the power supply along an existing route should not be that hard. There is an existing 33KV distribution network along the railway, this feeds numerous transformer/rectifier stations.

Additional transformers and rectifiers are mature technology and available from several suppliers.
If the existing 33KV network is inadequate, then replacing the cables with larger ones is a simple task. HV cable is used in vast quantities by the electricity supply industry and is readily available.

Isn't it more like largely due to the DfT» (Department for Transport - about)?
The DfT specified the level of service they expected from the bids without checking with Network Rail if it was possible. The DfT won't give Network Rail funding for the work that would need to be done to make that level of service possible.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40856



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #5 on: July 26, 2018, 13:28:54 »

Isn't it more like largely due to the DfT» (Department for Transport - about)?
The DfT specified the level of service they expected from the bids without checking with Network Rail if it was possible. The DfT won't give Network Rail funding for the work that would need to be done to make that level of service possible.

Worth quoting the conclusion of the article>

Quote
... one could be forgiven for assuming that the majority of the blame for this particular failure should accrue to Network Rail. Certainly – as an Office of Rail and Road (ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about)) report highlighted back in March – many of the current issues on the SWML (South Western Mail Line) can be traced back to issues with work they have or haven’t completed.

Yet in this instance, the blame largely doesn’t lie with Network Rail and that is why this issue is worth highlighting on its own, before we dive deeper into SWR» (South Western Railway - about) elsewhere.

The issue arose because of a failure on the part of the Department for Transport (DfT) – and to a lesser extent SWR – to realise that more power would be required at all.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page