Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 07:55 02 May 2024
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 18/05/24 - BRTA Westbury
22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber

On this day
2nd May (1859)
Royal Albert Bridge opens

Train RunningCancelled
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
05:23 Hereford to London Paddington
06:37 Plymouth to London Paddington
07:17 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
07:33 Weymouth to Gloucester
07:40 Bristol Temple Meads to Westbury
Short Run
06:04 Paignton to Exmouth
06:18 Yeovil Pen Mill to Filton Abbey Wood
06:34 Paignton to Exmouth
06:38 Weymouth to Gloucester
06:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
07:12 Newquay to Par
07:13 Great Malvern to London Paddington
11:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
Delayed
06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
06:43 Worcester Shrub Hill to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 02, 2024, 08:00:19 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[122] Train drivers "overwhelmingly white middle aged men"
[97] Visiting the pub on the way home.
[69] Leven, Fife, Scotland, fast forward a month
[53] Vintage film - how valid are these issues today?
[36] underground plans for Bristol update.
[25] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Shift from river transport to railways for freight.  (Read 803 times)
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5414



View Profile
« on: February 09, 2023, 04:31:32 »

In Europe and probably elsewhere, due to low water levels in major rivers resulting in ships running aground.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-64553079

Rail is generally faster but also more expensive and consumes more energy than a ship.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: February 09, 2023, 09:18:26 »

I was surprised by the figure given that rail and river produce similar amounts of CO2 per tonne-km, implying similar fuel use. I would have expected river to be more efficient, but I suppose I was thinking of sea, where each ship obviously carries more than one train, as opposed to river.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5414



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: February 09, 2023, 10:57:53 »

Ships almost always use less fuel per ton of freight than do trains.

Total fuel used is however not the same as carbon emissions. Almost all ships use diesel fuel, which is carbon intensive. Continental railways are largely electrified, in which case the carbon emissions of an electric train will depend on how the electricity is generated. If largely from renewables then the carbon emissions will be very low.

Total costs are rather variable and depend on staff numbers, wage rates, and taxes and subsidies, not just fuel.

If part of the journey must be by rail, then making the entire journey by rail saves the costs of transhipment.
For high value goods, less capital is tied up in goods in transit.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 09, 2023, 14:59:13 »

Ocean-going ships use bunker fuel rather than diesel, but river craft might use diesel. Bunker fuel is very dirty and has to undergo on-board processing in order to make it sufficiently liquid to ignite.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5414



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 10, 2023, 09:19:14 »

Ocean-going ships use bunker fuel rather than diesel, but river craft might use diesel. Bunker fuel is very dirty and has to undergo on-board processing in order to make it sufficiently liquid to ignite.

Yes, you are correct, bunker oil or similar heavier grades of oil fuel have a similar carbon intensity to diesel fuel, a bit worse in fact.
So my statement that ships almost always use less fuel than trains, but on average have worse carbon emissions than an electric train still stands.

Steam ships are now largely obsolete. Modern ships use large low speed diesels. Generally run on ordinary diesel fuel in port or when first started. Changed over to heavy oil when running. The heavy oil is strained, heated and then fine filtered before use.
« Last Edit: February 10, 2023, 14:40:56 by broadgage » Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page