An inspirational evening last night, in celebration of 50 years of the Campaign for Better Transport. 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. in a modern office tower block by London's Victoria Station. And much, much more than a celebration; started a bit slow but became both a reminder of the good that
CBT‡ has done and a reminder of the importance of having national campaigning bodies. And in other ways, not a celebration at all but a reminder of just how much hard work we have to do at present - it the sustainable transport "arena" times are tough; so much needs to be government lead and this government is failing to lead, or leading in the wrong direction.
Insiders telling us of differing policies in No. 10, at the Treasury and at the Department for Transport. The rail industry is furious with the
DfT» for all the time put into going to huge lengths to make ticket office closure plans as practical as possible to meet an impractical demand, only for the DfT to announce on the day the consultation review was completed and published that the rail industry proposals were not robust and the closures would not take place - blame placed on rail industry who had been given an impossible task, and were then shafted with the blame. And we are left with the old system where revision of the whole business of how people pay for the right travel and are confident of travel is necessary - we could do so much better.
The differing policies giving us the worst of both worlds can also be seen in the decision to reduce
HS2▸ (High Speed 2) to a line from Old Oak Common to Birmingham. Some people loved the full plan to provided extra capacity for trains from Central London to Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds, feeding on to existing lines which were/are not full to Newcastle and Carlisle, Glasgow and Edinburgh ... with resourced freed up for intermediate traffic (passenger and freight) in the heart of England. Others thought that HS2 was a bad idea in the first place. But what we are left with is line from Birmingham to the outskirts of London, with trains running on it then facing the bottlenecks from the Midlands to the North which means that if a trains goes from London(ish) to Manchester that way, it will be competing for line space with a train from London, Milton Keynes and Rugby once it gets to the upper Trent Valley. And I understand that the trains on order for HS2 run singly or in pairs (like the 5 car
IETs▸ ), but unlike the IETs where pairs will fit into the central city terminals, Manchester Piccadilly will only be able to handle a single unit as the platforms there are too short for the doubles. Couldn't make it up, could you?
I am going to post this in the "Smoke and Mirrors" board of my passenger chat forum -
http://www.passenger.chat/b3 as we see three big departments of government apparently at odds with each other. It was suggested last night that the Department for Transport Ministers were only told by the PM's office of the plans to change HS2 shortly before they were announced at the Tory conference, and that the ticket office business was instigated by the treasury and the decision to not go ahead, at all, was passed to DfT ministers at very short notice. It was suggested that our current rail minister are actually competent people, but have been constrained and instructed by unresearched policies at short notice from elsewhere. I would tend to "buy" that - based on the astonishing announcement of HS2 monies going into project that were already completed or had no chance, and were changed within a day or two when someone realised they made the government look silly. But whilst buying that, I also point out the cabinet responsibility and say that Messrs Harper and Merriman have accepted roles that require them to support and promotes decisions taken by Sunak and Hunt and imposed onto them.
Amazing that there we were last night in a big office full of transport consultant staff ("hundreds" of them), and it appears and was stated that the HS2 decision was taken by a PM who "hates trains" with a couple of "spotty faced youths" and a [named] "media hack" acting as his advisors. The Secretary of State would be welcome to explain and defend the position here, but has not (neither has his department) has the courtesy to take questions from the Community Rail community - just talking AT them, and not even replying to a forum invite. In start contrast to top guys at both
GWR▸ and Network Rail who have, and do, have the guts to face the public - mind you, whilst their stories may not be welcome, they are better informed and understandable.
So what do we do about what appears to be a lack of direction in sustainable transport at the very upper level of government?*
Work as best we can with those various levels and make use of the positive; recent successes include the retention of the London Travelcard, and the retention of the £2 flat bus fare.
*
Work with civil servant all those expert consultants to continue to inform to that positive outcomes can be implemented as the time is right.
*
Work with politicians and political advisors of all colours to establish ideas and relationships for the future. We don't know who will be in government this time next year and it's in the environment ans sustainable transport interest to ensure that whoever it is is well informed, and has policies (put to the electorate ahead of time?) which are thought out and sensible.
So - although the environment for transport progress looks bleak at present, there is work to be done and a probability that things will change. We do what we can at present, and look forward to working in an environment which will inevitable be changed after the general election, even if we are still working with the same players we have around at present.
