Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 23:15 05 May 2024
- Family of seven injured in holiday bus crash
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 18/05/24 - BRTA Westbury
22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber

On this day
5th May (1973)
Blue Pullman farewell tour (*)

Train RunningCancelled
22:15 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
22:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
23:11 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
06/05/24 04:57 Plymouth to Gunnislake
06/05/24 05:00 Reading to Redhill
06/05/24 05:14 Taunton to Bristol Temple Meads
06/05/24 05:42 Gunnislake to Plymouth
06/05/24 05:55 Plymouth to London Paddington
06/05/24 06:43 Redhill to Reading
06/05/24 06:48 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
06/05/24 07:03 Bristol Temple Meads to Taunton
06/05/24 08:12 Bristol Temple Meads to Avonmouth
06/05/24 08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
06/05/24 09:18 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
06/05/24 09:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
06/05/24 09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
06/05/24 11:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
06/05/24 11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
06/05/24 11:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
06/05/24 12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
06/05/24 13:50 London Paddington to Great Malvern
06/05/24 13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
06/05/24 13:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
06/05/24 14:01 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
06/05/24 14:19 Westbury to Swindon
06/05/24 14:53 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
06/05/24 15:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
06/05/24 15:14 Swindon to Westbury
06/05/24 15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
06/05/24 15:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
06/05/24 16:32 Great Malvern to London Paddington
06/05/24 18:02 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
06/05/24 19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
06/05/24 19:47 Bristol Temple Meads to Frome
06/05/24 20:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
06/05/24 20:58 Frome to Westbury
06/05/24 21:28 Weymouth to Westbury
06/05/24 21:33 Westbury to Salisbury
06/05/24 21:35 Maidenhead to Marlow
06/05/24 22:02 Marlow to Maidenhead
06/05/24 22:28 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
06/05/24 22:35 Maidenhead to Marlow
06/05/24 23:03 Marlow to Maidenhead
06/05/24 23:33 Reading to Gatwick Airport
06/05/24 23:50 Maidenhead to Marlow
07/05/24 00:17 Marlow to Maidenhead
07/05/24 04:45 Redhill to Gatwick Airport
07/05/24 05:11 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Short Run
21:08 Portsmouth Harbour to Bristol Temple Meads
06/05/24 05:11 Gloucester to Southampton Central
06/05/24 07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
06/05/24 08:19 Taunton to Cardiff Central
06/05/24 08:23 Southampton Central to Bristol Temple Meads
06/05/24 08:46 Avonmouth to Weston-Super-Mare
06/05/24 09:59 Cardiff Central to Taunton
06/05/24 11:52 London Paddington to Hereford
06/05/24 12:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
06/05/24 13:11 Taunton to Cardiff Central
06/05/24 13:32 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
06/05/24 15:18 Hereford to London Paddington
06/05/24 15:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Shrub Hill
06/05/24 15:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
06/05/24 16:58 London Paddington to Great Malvern
06/05/24 17:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
06/05/24 17:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
06/05/24 17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury
06/05/24 17:50 Penzance to London Paddington
06/05/24 17:55 Worcester Shrub Hill to Bristol Temple Meads
06/05/24 18:29 Warminster to Bristol Temple Meads
06/05/24 18:53 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
06/05/24 19:45 Great Malvern to London Paddington
06/05/24 19:50 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
06/05/24 20:06 Westbury to Cheltenham Spa
06/05/24 21:00 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Shrub Hill
06/05/24 21:31 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
06/05/24 21:53 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
etc
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 05, 2024, 23:33:39 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[142] Server load - 5th May 2024
[53] Problems with the Night Riviera sleeper - December 2014 onward...
[51] Walking between stations
[48] Something different !
[47] Champion to Westbury
[46] Visiting the pub on the way home.
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 31 32 [33] 34 35 ... 63
  Print  
Author Topic: Class 387 coming to Thames Valley - ongoing discussion  (Read 465347 times)
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4453


View Profile
« Reply #480 on: April 13, 2017, 21:23:15 »

Could you clarify what the ride height is please?
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5319


View Profile
« Reply #481 on: April 14, 2017, 11:01:23 »

Could you clarify what the ride height is please?

I think in this context the entire body of the train is being raised by a few cm with respect to the 'as designed' condition.  A while back they were talking about fitting various shims between the bogies and the vehicle body, basically packing out the suspension.

This therefore provides additional gauge clearance at some platform edges on the route.   It presumably also means that some units will not easily couple with others.

Paul

Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4363


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #482 on: April 14, 2017, 19:12:07 »

Could you clarify what the ride height is please?

I think in this context the entire body of the train is being raised by a few cm with respect to the 'as designed' condition.  A while back they were talking about fitting various shims between the bogies and the vehicle body, basically packing out the suspension.

This therefore provides additional gauge clearance at some platform edges on the route.   It presumably also means that some units will not easily couple with others.

Paul



yes that correct, I don't believe it effects the coupling of two units as the height increase is not that much
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #483 on: May 05, 2017, 18:34:03 »

Travelled on my first Class 387 today (05/05/2017).  Quite impressed with the quality and finish and the quiteness of the ride.  One comment is that the passengers on the 8 coach service could have all been squeezed into a single coach... Roll Eyes Tongue
Logged
Gordon the Blue Engine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 752


View Profile
« Reply #484 on: May 06, 2017, 09:23:30 »

Squeezing passengers in to the shortest possible train is not compulsory, although it does seem to be a feature of modern train travel!
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #485 on: May 06, 2017, 09:50:11 »

I've always thought it odd that most modern suburban/provincial DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit) are 2 and 3 car whilst non IC (Inter City) (intercity) EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit) all seem to be all 4 or more cars.
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #486 on: May 06, 2017, 10:31:19 »

I've always thought it odd that most modern suburban/provincial DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit) are 2 and 3 car whilst non IC (Inter City) (intercity) EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit) all seem to be all 4 or more cars.

A couple of theories, the easier being that the more heavily trafficked routes are more likely to have been electrified, so can therefore justify the longer rolling stock.

However, I suspect it is more complex than that.  All other things being equal, a mix of 2 and 3 car trains on a route enables a close tailoring of demand in that you can have any length of train from 2 onwards.  For diesels, other than the additional cost of the cabs, there isn't much difference in the cost, as every coach is powered.  However, for emus, the traction equipment is one per train, so (as an example), 2 x 2 car sets costs a lot more than 1 x 4 car set, and would be overpowered. Therefore the balance swings more to having longer trains with fewer sets. 
Logged
dviner
Full Member
***
Posts: 82


View Profile
« Reply #487 on: May 06, 2017, 13:08:02 »

However, I suspect it is more complex than that.  All other things being equal, a mix of 2 and 3 car trains on a route enables a close tailoring of demand in that you can have any length of train from 2 onwards.  For diesels, other than the additional cost of the cabs, there isn't much difference in the cost, as every coach is powered.  However, for emus, the traction equipment is one per train, so (as an example), 2 x 2 car sets costs a lot more than 1 x 4 car set, and would be overpowered. Therefore the balance swings more to having longer trains with fewer sets. 

Modern 2-car EMU (Electric Multiple Unit) sets are such a rarity that the electrification of the Marlow Branch is pretty much dead in the water.
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #488 on: May 06, 2017, 14:19:03 »

It's a pity the 2 car 309s were scrapped although they would be grossly overpowered for the Marlow branch. Unless of course sunless there's a Barry for redundant EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit).
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40872



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #489 on: May 06, 2017, 15:10:59 »

Unless of course sunless there's a Barry for redundant EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit).

How about a Bourne End to Marlow shuttle using stock from:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preserved_EMUs_of_Southern_Railway
and there are also electric trains being converted - some as 2 coach units - to diesels:
http://vivarail.co.uk/vivarail-news/
and in due course there may be some vintage 2 coach units available from elsewhere:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-35495934

... then extend the London - Maidenhead electric serve that starts in July to Bourne End  Grin

There is a real need to be able to run heritage EMUs ... but so much extra complexity is involved as soon as any heritage operation starts to share with main line certified stuff.  Is there space at Marlow for a depot building?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4363


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #490 on: May 06, 2017, 17:20:46 »

If and currently its a big if the Maidenhead / Bourne gets electrified, or indeed any of the TV branches.   The 387 are through corridor between units so with the use of SDO (Selective Door Opening) it would be feasible to run an 8 car unit Maidenhead / Bourne End, or do a 8 to 4 spilt at Maidenhead, but given in Crossrail mode there are no TV branches to Padd through services.  I believe the current pattern morning peaks of a 2 car 165 Bourne End Marlow and a 3 car 165/6 Maidenhead Bourne End with evening being a 2 car 165 Maidenhead Bourne perhaps a 3 car 165 is set in stone now for many years to come.

There is no funding at the moment for the TV branches to be wired, especially as Didcot / Oxford electrification is deferred

The biggest problem with the Bourne End Marlow line is the cost of altering the track work and platform extension at Bourne End to accommodate a 4 car unit.  It is unlikely the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) or TOC (Train Operating Company) would want to have a few odd 2 car units.

Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4363


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #491 on: May 20, 2017, 09:19:55 »

My understanding from folks I know in the project the final hurdle to run electric passenger services to Maidenhead has been signed of by the Office of Rail & Road.

Other than a major hic up the first electric passenger service will depart Maidenhead as timetabled
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10125


View Profile
« Reply #492 on: May 20, 2017, 12:02:50 »

The first 'real' tangible benefits of electrification should be felt from Monday onwards.  I put real in brackets because the Hayes shuttles ran on (modified) existing infrastructure.

I'll be very interested to hear the thoughts of those who are set to benefit from next week onwards.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4363


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #493 on: May 20, 2017, 20:33:48 »

The first 'real' tangible benefits of electrification should be felt from Monday onwards.  I put real in brackets because the Hayes shuttles ran on (modified) existing infrastructure.

I'll be very interested to hear the thoughts of those who are set to benefit from next week onwards.

There are limitations to the service that can be run, Kensal Green Feeder Station I understand has not been signed into use; this means all  electric (OLE (Overhead Line Equipment, more often "OHLE")) services out of Padd will have to rely on the original OOC (Old Oak Common (depot)) Feeder Station which is planned to be decommissioned when Kensal EIS (Enters Into Service) (EIS Enters Into Service)
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17905


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #494 on: May 20, 2017, 21:37:06 »

'EIS (Enters Into Service)' now 'enters into service' in the Coffee Shop forum's acronyms pageWink

Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 31 32 [33] 34 35 ... 63
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page