Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 12:35 02 May 2024
* Spectacular thunderstorms rumble across UK
* Russia blamed for GPS interference affecting flights in Europe
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 18/05/24 - BRTA Westbury
22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber

On this day
2nd May (1859)
Wilton South station opened

Train RunningCancelled
11:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
12:00 Oxford to London Paddington
13:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
Short Run
09:52 London Paddington to Hereford
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
13:18 Hereford to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 02, 2024, 12:37:55 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[232] Vintage film - how valid are these issues today?
[86] Leven, Fife, Scotland, fast forward a month
[79] Train drivers "overwhelmingly white middle aged men"
[63] Visiting the pub on the way home.
[23] underground plans for Bristol update.
[16] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
Author Topic: Person trapped and dragged, Notting Hill Gate station - 31 Jan 2018  (Read 7306 times)
CJB666
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 210


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: September 04, 2018, 16:02:02 »

I may have missed or forgotten one, but the incidents I can recall where an arm or similar-sized object was not detected were on mainline trains. More specifically, the Bushey one (see above) which was on a Class 350, Newcastle in 2014 (Class 185), Hayes & Harlington in 2015 (Class 165) and Kings Cross in 2011 (Class 365). The first two of those use "sensitive edges" which can be bent out of the door plane and so not detect an arm. The last two were working to the current standard (GM/RT2473) or the previous BR (British Rail(ways)) one (GO/OTS 300) which required detection of anything 25m across - not good enough to detect fingers or small hands.
And at Hounslow East there was an old lady who was dragged the length of the platform with her coat caught in the door. Over the years I have witnessed many attempts to 'harm' pax by TfL» (Transport for London - about) drivers on the Tube. On the Northern Line a few years ago the doors closed the doors on a pushchair with a kid inside. This bent the pushchair and nearly squashed the kid. The driver released the doors. The parents pulled the pushchair back onto the platform. The driver then closed the doors and sped off. Many Tube drivers have an appalling attitude towards passenger safety.
« Last Edit: September 04, 2018, 20:21:14 by CJB666 » Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6299


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: September 04, 2018, 17:07:26 »

Over the years I have witnessed many attempts at murder of pax by TfL» (Transport for London - about) drivers on the Tube.
I think to use the word murder is a bit strong there CJB666. Murder is always with the intention to kill someone. To say that TfL tube drivers have attempted to murder passengers is a somewhat baseless accusation.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7805



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: September 04, 2018, 17:10:06 »

Mind the gap
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7173


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: September 04, 2018, 19:52:37 »

The RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) only looked back to 2008 for previous events, and in part that's because they have only existed, and produced reports with recommendations in the present format, since 2005/6. But there is also the point that the trains, and in particular their safety systems and operating methods, have changed enough to make earlier events less relevant.

For example, that Hounslow East one was in 1993, and not only was it fatal but it was the first of three serious accidents. The next one was an elderly man dragged by his stick, and finally in 1997 at Holborn an 11-year old boy was dragged by his jacket into a tunnel and killed. Now, just before 1993 all the passenger emergency handles had been disconnected from the brakes, making them into alarms to the driver alone. After 1997, they were all changed again so they do stop the train if part of it is still in the station, but after that the driver can override it. The idea is that no-one is likely to survive being dragged in the tunnel once the train is up to speed. No doubt one could argue about that, but in this NHG case the train was already stopping before the victim got that far.
Logged
CJB666
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 210


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: September 11, 2018, 18:00:26 »

Yet again a 'drag and kill' ...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6154595/Disabled-passengers-Shih-Tzu-dog-died-lead-got-caught-trains-doors.html

Disabled passenger's Shih Tzu dog Jonty died after his lead got caught in a train's doors dragging him along the platform and into a tunnel

* Retired nurse Rose Barry boarded a train in Borehamwood, Hertfordshire, Friday
* She claims the doors closed which she was loading her luggage on to the coach
* Her Shih Tzu Jonty was dragged along the platform and killed as the doors shut
* Devastated Ms Barry is now demanding more help for disabled passengers 


Logged
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: September 11, 2018, 18:47:47 »

Yet again a 'drag and kill' ...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6154595/Disabled-passengers-Shih-Tzu-dog-died-lead-got-caught-trains-doors.html

Disabled passenger's Shih Tzu dog Jonty died after his lead got caught in a train's doors dragging him along the platform and into a tunnel

* Retired nurse Rose Barry boarded a train in Borehamwood, Hertfordshire, Friday
* She claims the doors closed which she was loading her luggage on to the coach
* Her Shih Tzu Jonty was dragged along the platform and killed as the doors shut
* Devastated Ms Barry is now demanding more help for disabled passengers 

Was it on a DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) service which I suspect it was then bully for the unions for demanding a second person on board.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12367


View Profile Email
« Reply #21 on: September 11, 2018, 20:18:16 »

Did she help herself by booking assustance?
Logged
CJB666
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 210


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: September 12, 2018, 15:37:32 »

Did she help herself by booking assistance?

It was at Boreham Wood. The train was a 12 car Thameslink. The station was unstaffed. The driver couldn't see her due to a bend in the track. Thameslink is one man operated - what SWR» (South Western Railway - about) guards are fighting against. They sent the body back to her.

Could easily have been herself or anyone with clothes getting trapped in the doors.

Why don't train drivers care enough about safety to make checks on the CCTV (Closed Circuit Tele Vision) monitors - if the station has any?

https://metro.co.uk/2018/09/11/dog-died-after-lead-got-trapped-in-train-door-dragging-it-into-tunnel-7934413/
https://www.metro.news/dog-dragged-to-his-death-as-lead-gets-stuck-in-train-doors/1222177/
http://www.borehamwoodtimes.co.uk/news/16834964.dog-dies-after-he-was-dragged-along-platform-in-borehamwood/

Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18925



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: September 12, 2018, 16:22:36 »

There should be CCTV (Closed Circuit Tele Vision) coverage for the entire passenger/train interface. Covering every door.

Whether a shih tzu would have seen is another matter...
« Last Edit: September 12, 2018, 17:42:34 by bignosemac » Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5319


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: September 12, 2018, 17:27:55 »

There should be CCTV (Closed Circuit Tele Vision) coverage for the entire passenger/train interface. Covering every door.
Thameslink 700s use bodyside cameras like 387s, shouldn’t really be issues with bends in the track.  With a central driving position the driver won’t be looking back out the window either. 

Paul
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10122


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: September 12, 2018, 17:37:10 »

The bodyside cameras are an improvement on traditional platform mounted CCTV (Closed Circuit Tele Vision) monitors, provided the image transmitted is of sufficient quality.  Still, it's not easy for one person to monitor twenty-four sets of doors on a train with hundreds of people milling about on the platform, and I guess you could argue the number of incidents is pretty low given the tens of thousands of times per day trains are dispatched this way.

Speaking of image quality, I was quite surprised just how bad the image quality is when sitting in the cab of a DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) train - the IET (Intercity Express Train)'s ones are quite jerky and often blurred due to not being used much at the moment and therefore not cleaned regularly.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
1st fan
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 407


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: September 12, 2018, 19:38:20 »

I don't think a lift would move with an arm or foot in the door but, according to Chris B, a tube train will.

But ChrisB was talking about "these events", which I take to be not only tube trains.

I was on the tube last night and the driver made an announcement specifically for one passenger. He gave this woman a right telling off for boarding as the doors were closing. She had caught her large-ish bag in the doors and caused him to open them again. Telling her how dangerous it was how it held up everyone from getting home etc. After a minute or so of lambasting her stupidity we moved off.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12367


View Profile Email
« Reply #27 on: September 14, 2018, 10:19:08 »

Did she help herself by booking assistance?

It was at Boreham Wood. The train was a 12 car Thameslink. The station was unstaffed.

The initial report stated that she went back to the station building to find two staff there, uninterested. It is not unmanned. I think it has ticket barriers too. She didn't book assistance & never has it appears.
Logged
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: September 14, 2018, 10:57:22 »

Many older folk still like to enjoy their independence and are too proud to ask for assistance except in the extreme.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12367


View Profile Email
« Reply #29 on: September 14, 2018, 11:30:58 »

Indeed....they need to learn that it often helps.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page