Changes in compensation scheme (to train operators) proposed

grahame

Administrator
Hero Member

Posts: 40853

Changes in compensation scheme (to train operators) proposed

« on: December 18, 2012, 05:32:02 »

From Rail User Express, the newsletter of Railfuture, dated 16th December 2012:

Quote

The Office of Rail Regulation is seeking views on a range of detailed issues relating to Schedules 4 and 8 ^ the compensation train operators receive for the financial impact of planned and unplanned rail service disruption attributable to Network Rail or other train operators. Schedule 4 compensates train operators for the impact of planned service disruption, and Schedule 8 compensates train operators for the impact of unplanned service disruption. Compensation is intended to cover fare revenue losses or costs, such as those associated with running replacement buses. It is important that Network Rail and train operators are incentivised to work in the best interests of passengers and customers by avoiding disruption. The closing date for comments is 28 Jan 2013.

Also to note - RAIL, current edition - suggestion is perhaps to remove cap which would hit heritage operators.

http://www.rail-reg.gov.uk/pr13/consultations/possessions-and-performance-regimes.php


	Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep

eightf48544

Transport Scholar
Hero Member

Posts: 4574

Re: Changes in compensation scheme (to train operators) proposed

« Reply #1 on: December 18, 2012, 08:16:13 »

How about having no compensation scheme at all. It would save millions shuffling money around the system and probably make absolutely no differnce to the overall costs of running the railway. Each TOC^▸ bears it's own risk.

How many clerks work on delay minutes did I see something like 300 somewhere?


	Logged

trainer

Hero Member

Posts: 1035

Re: Changes in compensation scheme (to train operators) proposed

« Reply #2 on: December 18, 2012, 09:45:53 »

Quote from the document:

'Passengers and freight customers care about disruption to their service.'

Passengers! Wonderful use of accurate English. Passenger train operators please note.

The substance of the document I'll let the more knowledgeable debate.


	Logged

ray951

Transport Scholar
Hero Member

Posts: 462

Re: Changes in compensation scheme (to train operators) proposed

« Reply #3 on: December 18, 2012, 09:49:46 »

I say scrap it, as isn't the compensation scheme a 'hidden' subsidy to TOC^▸ 's from Network Rail?
ie the compensation paid is more than the cost to the TOC of any delay.

Or if not scarpped ensure that TOC's only get compensated for monies paid in compensation to customers, and that all other costs are just the cost of doing business.


	Logged

phile

Hero Member

Posts: 1382

Language spoken Welsh as well as English

Re: Changes in compensation scheme (to train operators) proposed

« Reply #4 on: December 18, 2012, 19:18:33 »

It's only passing money round the same industry and how much does this all cost.


	Logged

Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

Pages: [1]

« previous next »