Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 07:35 03 May 2024
- Protesters held as asylum seekers' transfer thwarted
- Train strikes: How May's disruption affects you
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 18/05/24 - BRTA Westbury
22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber

On this day
3rd May (2018)
~ Just one working lower quadrant distant signal left (link)

Train RunningShort Run
06:12 Frome to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
May 03, 2024, 07:51:41 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[203] Vintage film - how valid are these issues today?
[153] Severn Tunnel emergency closure, 2nd May 2024.
[65] Train drivers "overwhelmingly white middle aged men"
[62] Rail unions strike action 2022/2023/2024
[36] Leven, Fife, Scotland, fast forward a month
[26] underground plans for Bristol update.
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 6
  Print  
Author Topic: FGW may get "NEW" stock for Bristol area  (Read 21167 times)
The SprinterMeister
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 665


Trundling round the SW

Chris64ex4@hotmail.com
View Profile Email
« Reply #15 on: August 24, 2008, 09:21:02 »

The HSTs (High Speed Train) are owned by First Group as opposed to First Great Western, as a strategic investment AFAIK (as far as I know). The 143s are a bit cheap so the DfT» (Department for Transport - about)/SRA» (Strategic Rail Authority - about) needn't get involved on that one.


IIRC (if I recall/remember/read correctly), the 143's were owned by Nat/Ex and were sold on as part of the franchise. They had been bought from BR (British Rail(ways)) by one of the Welsh Councils some years ago.
Logged

Trundling gently round the SW
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #16 on: August 24, 2008, 12:33:48 »

Thanks for all the replies.

To sum up FGW (First Great Western) may get some 150s sometime presumably for Bristol and the West.

Thames Valley will have to suffer until Crossrail.

What a way to run a railway!

Logged
6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2754



View Profile Email
« Reply #17 on: August 24, 2008, 23:11:49 »

dont quote me on this but more that one person has said to me that 143's for the exeter area are a possibility
Logged
smithy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 471


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: August 25, 2008, 14:59:03 »

dont quote me on this but more that one person has said to me that 143's for the exeter area are a possibility


i believe could be as early as october but definatly once they are refurbed is what i have heard
Logged
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: August 25, 2008, 20:12:01 »

dont quote me on this but more that one person has said to me that 143's for the exeter area are a possibility
FGW (First Great Western) have been so impressed with Exeter depot for improving the reliability of the 142's (which i'm led to believe are now the most reliable units in the FGW fleet) that they want Exeter to do the same to the 143's, the reason the 142's have become so reliable is because they all go back to the same depot each evening, the same as SWT (South West Trains)'s 159's so that there's no "passing the buck" with repairs, i.e. the common reply to a fault in a repair book "for attention of home depot".
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17900


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #20 on: August 25, 2008, 21:05:19 »

Thanks for your post on that, vacman!

That is certainly what Andrew Griffiths was saying, at the FOSBR (Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways) meeting I attended a few weeks ago: he was full of praise for Exeter depot staff, in achieving a rate of 3,000 mile per casualty for the 142s.

Well done, chaps!  Wink
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: August 25, 2008, 21:07:47 »

More like 6,500!!
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17900


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #22 on: August 25, 2008, 21:30:41 »

Well, that's even better, then, Liam!

3,000 was the figure Andrew Griffiths quoted to me - and Ollie, who was also at that meeting - on 12 July 2008: see http://www.iworkforfgw.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=118

 Wink
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
G.Uard
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 426


"Are we at Yate yet?"


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: August 26, 2008, 06:41:46 »

Rumour in the north of the area is that we are to get several 150/1 (non front gangwayed ) units.  Anyone travelling frequently in the Brizzle area will already have experienced these as we currently have 2 or 3 in service, (green and blue paint job with a slam crew door).

Although the current units have 3+2 seating, a refurb could render the 'new' stock similar to existing 150/2s.  From a guard's point of view, they have nice big cabs, but can only be worked from cab ends, which would be a PIA with 3 car configuration on busy trains.
Logged
smithy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 471


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: August 26, 2008, 15:09:58 »

Rumour in the north of the area is that we are to get several 150/1 (non front gangwayed ) units.  Anyone travelling frequently in the Brizzle area will already have experienced these as we currently have 2 or 3 in service, (green and blue paint job with a slam crew door).

Although the current units have 3+2 seating, a refurb could render the 'new' stock similar to existing 150/2s.  From a guard's point of view, they have nice big cabs, but can only be worked from cab ends, which would be a PIA with 3 car configuration on busy trains.

150001&2 coming december no gangway door but power crew doors,approx 10 more hybrid 3 cars 2009-2010.
apparently once all sets recieved will have refresh to fgw standard and getting intermediate door controls and remote supply amongst other stuff.
Logged
G.Uard
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 426


"Are we at Yate yet?"


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: August 26, 2008, 18:43:18 »


150001&2 coming december no gangway door but power crew doors,approx 10 more hybrid 3 cars 2009-2010.
apparently once all sets recieved will have refresh to fgw standard and getting intermediate door controls and remote supply amongst other stuff.


 Smiley Won't be that different from the 150/2s then. And....I for one love that nice big cab.
Logged
Sprog
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 109


View Profile Email
« Reply #26 on: August 30, 2008, 13:09:48 »

Rumour in the north of the area is that we are to get several 150/1 (non front gangwayed ) units.  Anyone travelling frequently in the Brizzle area will already have experienced these as we currently have 2 or 3 in service, (green and blue paint job with a slam crew door).

Although the current units have 3+2 seating, a refurb could render the 'new' stock similar to existing 150/2s.  From a guard's point of view, they have nice big cabs, but can only be worked from cab ends, which would be a PIA with 3 car configuration on busy trains.

fGW have 2 150/1s, 150121 & 150127.

Been informed that both, plus any other we recieve from London Midland and LORL (formerly Silverlink), are to be 'refreshed' soon, possibly in-house to a simlar standard to the fGW 150/2s.

The Class 143s, once refreshed, are going to be allocated to Exeter depot once the short-term lease 142s are returned, so that the 'pacer' fleet has a dedicated home depot (proved by the excellent work they have done on the 142 fleet, which are no reaching 6,500 MPC (Miles Per Casualty)! - better than ANY od the DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) classes in the Wessex Trains era.). In turn, SPM (St Philip's Marsh (Bristol depot)) will be allocated half of Exters 150s to lighten their already high workload.

The eventual plan is to use the 150/1s on the Bristol local services etc, whilst keeping the 142/143s in Devon.
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #27 on: August 30, 2008, 16:20:10 »

So Roger Ford may be right FGW (First Great Western) may get some 150s from Overground or London Midland. However, it does seem a bit disingenuous of the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) to claim these are part of the 1300 "new" carriages, even if they are refurbished.

It's good to see Exeter improving the performance of the 142s, but even 6500 miles is still very low compared with a modern electric units which are getting 40K to 50K. However it does re-enforce the view that dedicated depots for single classes of units is way to improve performance.

One of the things that  makes the current franchise set up so stupid is that Bletchley depot which dealt with Silverlinks 321s and was consistently awared silver spanners, was closed when whoever (I really can't be bother to work out which franchise runs which trains) took over moved their maintenance away from Bletchley.

When National Express take over First and First take over Arriva and Arriva take over National Express franchises what's the betting  Exeter depot will be closed?

Logged
gaf71
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 305


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: August 30, 2008, 16:41:07 »

  From a guard's point of view, they have nice big cabs, but can only be worked from cab ends, which would be a PIA with 3 car configuration on busy trains.
I thought the 150/1's had intermediate door controls? Or am I thinking of the ex Arriva 150's?
As for the 143's coming to Exeter(my depot), i'm glad the fitters are doing such a good job, put from a train crew and passenger point of view, it's bad news if you are in this area, as the pacers are the least comfortable for passengers, and the worst units to work(for traincrew). Not that we see much else down here these days anyway!
Logged
smithy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 471


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: August 30, 2008, 19:32:07 »

  From a guard's point of view, they have nice big cabs, but can only be worked from cab ends, which would be a PIA with 3 car configuration on busy trains.
I thought the 150/1's had intermediate door controls? Or am I thinking of the ex Arriva 150's?
As for the 143's coming to Exeter(my depot), i'm glad the fitters are doing such a good job, put from a train crew and passenger point of view, it's bad news if you are in this area, as the pacers are the least comfortable for passengers, and the worst units to work(for traincrew). Not that we see much else down here these days anyway!

150/1's dont only ex wessex and atw have it,apparently on refresh it is to be fitted
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 6
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page