1112
|
All across the Great Western territory / Your rights and redress / Re: Should we be encouraging mask use where possible even for the legally exempt?
|
on: October 29, 2020, 16:40:17
|
However, in the case of this pandemic it should be quite obvious to everyone why the rules are there. They are there to limit the spread of the virus. So if you have a situation where rule A and rule B appear to be in conflict, the correct thing to do is to look at the reason for the rule and act according to the spirit of the rule, not its letter.
The rules' effectiveness in limiting the spread of the virus is compromised by the need (real or perceived) to keep the economy going and various functions of normal society, such as schools, running. This will lead some people to question the point of following them at all, and others to question the point of the exceptions. That was what I was trying to say, in two sentences.
|
|
|
1114
|
All across the Great Western territory / Your rights and redress / Re: Should we be encouraging mask use where possible even for the legally exempt?
|
on: October 29, 2020, 09:57:53
|
To me there is a basic truth in that example. If one starts an examination of a New Rule by thinking about what it has been introduced for in the first place, and acts accordingly, one doesn?t need definitions, one shouldn?t be looking for loopholes and one (well me at least) usually takes more anti-COVID precautions than I?m being told to. It's not always clear what the rules are for, since they try to balance conflicting priorities; in this case, keeping the economy 'open' and reducing people mixing. So we wear masks walking into a cafe or restaurant but then spend most of the time chatting away without them. Add to this that the rules are made in parliament but applied by businesses, schools, bus drivers and so on, all with their own priorities, and it's no wonder there are inconsistencies in application.
|
|
|
1116
|
All across the Great Western territory / The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom / Re: Aurora, Paragon, Azuma, IET, Nova 1, Javelin
|
on: October 28, 2020, 21:27:32
|
A comparison might be with HSTs▸ when these were in more widespread use. They were generally liked and invariably known as HSTs, no matter where used or whom operated them.
I've always known them as (Inter City) 125s. It's only since I joined this forum that I've seen them called HST's instead. I can't remember not using both names, and probably HST125 as well, ever since I first travelled on one (about 1978). So if one train can have multiple names even with one operator at one time, there's no chance of limiting the names with multiple operators!
|
|
|
1117
|
All across the Great Western territory / Your rights and redress / Re: Should we be encouraging mask use where possible even for the legally exempt?
|
on: October 28, 2020, 16:53:40
|
With regard to children wearing masks, rather than use age why not impose them when they enter secondary school? That has a defined start date. Where first, middle and upper school systems are in place choose one of the progression points.
That would work fine when they're in school. When they're anywhere else, it leads to all sorts of vagueness. What if you're in middle school and visit an area which has primary and secondary? Or an area which has both systems? Or you're at a private school which doesn't follow the general primary-secondary distinction? Or home schooled? Age is arbitrary but can at least be determined.
|
|
|
|