Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 660
|
1
|
Journey by Journey / Plymouth and Cornwall / Re: Cornish delays
|
on: Yesterday at 15:12:27
|
The days of 'spare' crew sitting around 'just in case' must have ceased years ago.
Still plenty of spares sitting around on occasions. Depends on time of day, time of year, day of week, and the nearest depot as to how likely you might be able to get cover. If you have short notice sickness then if there is no spare available it becomes very tricky. You might get lucky and have someone that agrees to stay on, but that’s rare - especially with the current ongoing dispute.
|
|
|
3
|
All across the Great Western territory / The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom / Re: Labour to nationalise railways within five years of coming to power.
|
on: April 25, 2024, 07:39:14
|
and nothing will change,
will we go back to the "old days" of when all services waited for a late running connections,within reason?
and accountability for delay minutes will be done away with.
Good to see some actual commitments from Labour. I doubt a huge amount will change, but GBR▸ does desperately need to happen ASAP as we currently have the worst of both worlds. Delay minute accountability won’t change much IMHO▸ . All the privately owned freight and open access operators will still be running (probably more of the latter), who will need compensating if the agreements they have are breached. Not too many crumbs of comfort offered to the unions either.
|
|
|
8
|
Journey by Journey / London to the Cotswolds / Re: 2024 Delays and Cancellations - North Cotswold Line
|
on: April 14, 2024, 16:29:59
|
There’s a lot to moan about on the railways as we know, but just taking a look at today’s unit allocations on the line and of the 29 trains on the route today, just 2 were allocated for 5-car units - the first up one and one of the evening down ones.
In the pre-IET▸ days on a Sunday it was a mix of 3,5,7, and 8 carriage trains, so quite a leap in the right direction capacity wise on the increasingly busy Sunday services.
|
|
|
9
|
Journey by Journey / TransWilts line / Re: IETs at Melksham
|
on: April 14, 2024, 12:24:33
|
There is a difference, albeit a subtle one, between a station in the database with a platform with unusual characteristics and one that is not in the database at all.
The TMS will recognise it's at Par, whereas it would not (currently) recognise Melksham. As I’ve said before though, a manual door release is perfectly possible where you can choose any individual door on the train to release if you wish.
It’s best practice, where possible, to have the system do it for you rather than the risk the driver selects the wrong doors by mistake as it’s not very often they have to do it.
|
|
|
13
|
All across the Great Western territory / Active travel: Cyclists and walkers, including how the railways deal with them / Re: Difficult to argue with e-bike/scooter rules?
|
on: April 09, 2024, 15:57:22
|
They have to be banned unless regulation-use batteries are used, simple. Registration maybe required as someone will die otherwise from use of unregulated battery explosion
These batteries are invariably imported from places of doubtful reputation. The makers will apply whatever approval marks or certificates that are required for the intended market. including CE marking, UL listed, or any other standard. Better regulation and clearer laws will no doubt help - the current free-for-all cannot continue. If you pass laws that make JustEat and the like directly responsible for ensuring their riders use proper equipment (perhaps by supplying it, or offering incentive schemes through approved retailers) and don't break the law then that will help enormously IMHO▸ . Forcing them to provide proper contracts of employment rather than treating them as contractors and letting them get on with sourcing their own bikes and (lack of) equipment will also help. Being paid per delivery only encourages them to buy unsuitable equipment and ride it irresponsibly. It might end up making their businesses unviable which is tough.
|
|
|
|