Show Posts
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 660
|
21
|
Journey by Journey / TransWilts line / Re: 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury
|
on: March 30, 2024, 05:31:31
|
Thanks, II for that insight into the complexity of staff rostering.
I guess that calling it a planning error could be justified as the late running of the inbound train from Paddington would have been predictable from about 13:15. Time sufficient to organise a taxi for the crew?
However, the recent posts of the thread have been to draw attention to the reasons given to the public and their less-than-credible nature sometimes. Communication of delays has for a long time been something flagged for "must do better".
Please don't take this as personal criticism. I value your input to the forum.
I quite agree, and no personal criticism taken - it’s nice to have the opportunity to help explain sometimes. To be fair to GWR▸ the level of detail in explaining disruption in layman’s terms has become much better over the last year or so. As a forum our collective knowledge is better than most of the passengers that GWR provides for, and I think we need to remember that when deciding what the best way of explaining a delay is that is sufficient for most people to understand. That being said, there are examples when I think they have got that balance wrong. The TM‡ yesterday booked on duty to travel on that train so I don’t know how long a taxi might take to St. Erth but it might not have been in time for the train that ended up being cancelled anyway? It’s also quite possible that nobody realised it might be an issue due to the general levels of disruption and a small team trying to oversee it all from within control. Local supervisors in days gone by would have been more likely to notice it. When things go wrong, there are several things that now make it worse: - The aforementioned lack of local supervisors.
- The slow erosion of route knowledge that a-driver mentioned.
- And the stupid rostering of staff in the last few years meaning small efficiency gains that result in multiple unnecessary changes of crew enroute. Looks fine on paper, but in reality makes managing disruption far harder.
|
|
|
22
|
Journey by Journey / TransWilts line / Re: 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury
|
on: March 29, 2024, 17:39:00
|
I'm shocked...............I'm sure you wouldn't wish to suggest that GWR▸ would be anything other than 100% honest with their valued and respected customers? Journeycheck/greatwesternrailway: 17:03 St Ives to St Erth due 17:14 will be cancelled. This is due to heavy rain flooding the railway. One service each way lost due to flooding? Or would you rather believe RTT» : This service was cancelled due to a planning error (TA). Depends how far you want to trace back a delay? The TM‡ for that round trip from St. Erth to St. Ives travels on 1A96, the 16:15 from Penzance which was 32 minutes late arriving at St. Erth, so if it had run it would have been with at least a 10 minute delay. The 16:15 from Penzance was delayed by late arrival of the inward working from London, which was delayed by the flooding.
|
|
|
25
|
All across the Great Western territory / Smoke and Mirrors / Re: Notification of different standards - Bedwyn and Melksham
|
on: March 25, 2024, 15:18:40
|
Yes - sort of. But the extra track is (or has been) routinely used to harbour freight trains for significant periods, so would not be available for passenger trains. I understand that with a change in the freight operator, there may have been changes in the use of Westbury yard, and if that's the case perhaps - just perhaps - the option to extend the platform out to the remaining line might be back on the table. I do recall that when a train split the points to the west (knocking out platforms 1, 2 and 3) that a limited non-stop service was provided via the back line, so it may already be signalled for passenger trains.
It's currently a PF▸ (Permissive Freight) line, so that excludes any passenger trains except by special arrangement (such as the case you mention). There's also a tight radius at the western end which means Class 158s (and 153s, not that there are any of those in the area anymore) are barred at that end.
|
|
|
27
|
All across the Great Western territory / The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom / Re: Nice work if you can get it ??
|
on: March 25, 2024, 06:01:45
|
The Sunday Times, which the BBC» cites, says it is a flat £600 in place of £125 plus an hourly rate, which they don't specify. That's not how the BBC put it; they say both are in addition to the driver's salary. But as an extra day, it would be - wouldn't it?
Unless they mean, but neither exactly says, that the day is paid an additional standard day's salary (i.e just time), and this bonus is on top. The Sunday Times does quote £67,000 for four days per week - which for 48 weeks is 67,000/192 or £350 per day. So £600 flat is up from £475 average, if that's what it means, and it probably does as it is plausible. £950 average would up up much more!
The £125 is a rest day working premium paid on top of a minimum 8 hours pay at their normal rate (or whatever the length of shift is if over 8 hours). That worked out at a minimum of £421.
|
|
|
29
|
All across the Great Western territory / Smoke and Mirrors / Re: Notification of different standards - Bedwyn and Melksham
|
on: March 24, 2024, 13:01:20
|
There are several reasons, but the key one, which IIRC▸ Mark Hopwood confirmed, is that trains diverted through Melksham are exactly that. Diverted. And already facing a lengthy delay as a result.
The likes of Hungerford are on the line of route, so the only delay is for the station stop.
Whether it’s right or wrong, Mark does not want a further 2-3 minute delay on an already very late service that would result from the station call at Melksham. And of course that also affects the number of diverted trains that can be squeezed through per hour on the lengthy single line section, which is why the local service is axed in the first place.
|
|
|
30
|
All across the Great Western territory / Across the West / Re: Rail unions strike action 2022/2023/2024
|
on: March 23, 2024, 11:25:26
|
Yes, I think we’re kind of in agreement…though we’ll have to get you a Broadgage style bingo card. It’s all about letting everyone know ASLEF» are still in dispute occasionally, but until the Tories are ousted there will be no real likelihood of a settlement, and fair play to ASLEF for not ruining the big Easter getaway for the all important leisure market.
|
|
|
|