6886
|
Journey by Journey / London to Didcot, Oxford and Banbury / Re: Level crossing collisions at Sandy Lane, Yarnton - merged topic
|
on: January 02, 2013, 17:13:47
|
For those that don't know, Sandy Lane is an AHB (Automatic Half Barrier) crossing on the main line with line speeds of 100mph. This freight train would have been travelling at no more than 75mph though.
Another tragic level crossing incident, and the BBC» has at least stuck with a sensible, non sensationalist and accurate headline rather than ITV's three offerings which have had the following three headlines so far:
'Train crash death - police statement' ITV News 16:41 'One man dead in train crash' ITV News 16:31 'Transport police confirm train crash' ITV News 16:21
|
|
|
6888
|
All across the Great Western territory / Fare's Fair / Re: "Advanced" tickets
|
on: January 02, 2013, 09:58:40
|
"This train will shortly be arriving into Reading", which always makes me cringe (the sentence construction, not the town [city?] of Reading).
"The train now arriving on platform number 1" gets my gander up in particular. Not only is it a little silly saying the word 'number', but any train arriving on a platform is not a sight I wish to see!
|
|
|
6890
|
Sideshoots - associated subjects / The Lighter Side / Re: Picture quiz (sort of...)
|
on: January 01, 2013, 21:16:06
|
HSTs▸ were introduced on the Western Region in May 1980, so anytime from then until March 1985 is the timescale involved! The new livery was being introduced during '85 too.
As 'John R' says it was 1976. I remember being a young lad on Didcot Parkway and being fascinated by them roaring through in the late 70s. The key to the date might well be the 253005 on the power car end as it very soon became clear that numbering sets like that wasn't going to work in the long term as power cars were always being swapped about, as indeed were the coaches. Not sure how long until those numbers were removed though.
|
|
|
6892
|
All across the Great Western territory / Across the West / Re: Reading Station improvements
|
on: January 01, 2013, 15:25:19
|
......so that looks like the temporary turnout (as numbered 5c and 10c) on the Easter 2013 track diagrams provided by your good self in a previous post. Quite likely it is going to be used by all the Cross Country reversers (but not terminators):
Indeed it does, with the 05c and 10c being the distance in chains from MP36. Took another look at it today and if anything it looks like 15mph not 25mph!
|
|
|
6893
|
All across the Great Western territory / Across the West / Re: Reading Station improvements
|
on: December 31, 2012, 22:45:53
|
No, it starts before the western end of Platform 8 (a small section of which has been demolished if you see what I mean), then arcs over to the current Down Relief line joining it before (I think) the Caversham Road bridge, in a similar position to where the old Platform 7 line converged with the Down Relief.
|
|
|
6894
|
All across the Great Western territory / Across the West / Re: Reading Station improvements
|
on: December 31, 2012, 21:49:54
|
According to the Signalling Scheme Plan (final layout) its 50mph along the Down Main Loop and back to the Down Main (back up to 60mph) with a 40mph turnout to the Up Westbury.
Well, there's no way on earth that it'll be 50mph - I'll try and get a picture to demonstrate how sharp it is. I suspect it's a temporary crossover pending further remodelling and a higher linespeed when all the bits of the jigsaw at the western end of the station are in place?
|
|
|
6895
|
All across the Great Western territory / Across the West / Re: Reading Station improvements
|
on: December 31, 2012, 20:49:57
|
Not quite in view from any of the lobstervision.tv webcams, but the new connection at the western end of the station from Platform 8 (what will be the 'Down Main Loop') to the Down Main was also installed over the Christmas shutdown. It looks like a fairly slow turnout of 25mph to me (compared with everything else installed so far which looks like 40mph) and cuts across what was the extreme end of Platform 8 and, prior to 2012, the connection into the old Platform 7 bay platform.
|
|
|
6898
|
All across the Great Western territory / Across the West / Re: Major delays/cancellations, Paddington to Reading, 20 December 2012 and ongoing ...
|
on: December 29, 2012, 23:48:26
|
So I wonder how many staff would feel they want to "help out" by getting into Swindon Control at 5 am at short notice on a Monday morning to deal with an engineering overrun. If they were told to they would because they may be worried by the consequences if they didn't, but would they willingly volunteer because they thought their contribution would be appreciated by their employer?
I would imagine some form of sweetener in the form of a bonus payment or possibly a couple of extra days leave would be enough to get the interest levels up. Also, bearing in mind that some of the staff I mentioned are involved in quite menial tasks on a day-to-day basis, so some might enjoy the change?
|
|
|
6899
|
All across the Great Western territory / Across the West / Re: Great Western Main Line electrification - ongoing discussion
|
on: December 29, 2012, 23:25:50
|
The first electrification masts are up on the GWML▸ ! Quite a surreal sight to be honest, but about half a mile of track just to the east of Reading station has now got masts up (no wires yet of course) in the same area as the new switches and crossings that have been installed at Kennet Bridge Junction. I'm guessing that this is a short test/proving area prior to the HOOP train starting in earnest next year?
I think it was always the plan to make passive provision for electrification during the Reading remodelling. It makes sense, in order to minimise disruption later, to do as much as possible in places that are currently away from the live railway. I suspect that now electrification beyond the extent of Crossrail is going ahead, it's worth putting up the masts before the new platforms open.
Of the two options, I think Western Explorer's is the more likely explanation, despite my huge respect for Industry Insider's encyclopaedic knowledge. The High Output Operating Plant system isn't due for delivery for a few months yet. Thank you, and yes, having thought about it a little 'Western Explorer's' hunch is probably closer to the mark, though the section that's been done is very much still part of the live railway - I remember hearing that electrification of the new platforms would start to take place by the end of the year, so this may be the first sign of that phase of the work.
|
|
|
6900
|
All across the Great Western territory / Across the West / Re: Major delays/cancellations, Paddington to Reading, 20 December 2012 and ongoing ...
|
on: December 29, 2012, 12:32:34
|
I would suggest that there are ways to provide more staff during periods of disruption, with little overall increases in cost. There are no shortage of other FGW▸ staff working at (or near) Swindon, you could have a pool of them trained to become assistants at times when there is service disruption - i.e. they get pulled from their normal duties to help out answering telephone calls, or updating the website for example (getting through to someone is one of the major bug bears of staff).
Be they a combination of office workers (not ideal when the disruption is outside of office hours), or station staff (barrier staff - if it's bad enough just leave the gates open at Swindon or Didcot for a few hours and get those staff up in Control answering telephones), or even agency staff (could some kind of dual roles be created where security/cleaning/car park staff are trained up to help?). I'm not talking about real decision making roles - that should stay with the 'three in charge' currently, but just some admin support which is desperately needed.
Also, perhaps an agreement with NR» that decisions can be devolved more locally during times of disruption without everything having to go through Control. For example, the AOM's at the out stations could allocate drivers like the previous Train Crew Supervisors at those locations used to do (editing Genius themselves so that everyone knows what everyone is doing), or the Duty Manager being able to issue a stop order for small locations such as Appleford?
|
|
|
|