5116
|
Journey by Journey / TransWilts line / Re: Melksham Railway Development Group - AGM and future meetings
|
on: August 04, 2013, 13:58:21
|
There are similarities to the Severn Beach line story here - in 2005, there was a pretty nominal service, and a plan by Atkins to rip the line up for a busway. The initial response was angry, but led in 2007 to additional services. Passenger numbers increased rapidly, and the line will see a million passengers this year. As with the trans-Wilts line, the key to success was to raise the profile initially by any means possible, leading to true co-operation between campaign groups, councils, and FGW▸ . I'm sure trans-Wilts will bear similar fruit for the considerable effort put in by MRDC and others. The impact will be felt well beyond Wiltshire, and I add my respect for the valuable work done.
|
|
|
5118
|
Journey by Journey / Swindon to Gloucester / Cheltenham / Re: Swindon to Kemble re-doubling - ongoing discussion and updates
|
on: August 04, 2013, 13:33:25
|
The South Liberty Lane depot is getting busier. I think a little more was done there than just gardening, and I think two sidings have been relaid. It only took a day or so, there was nothing fancy involved. Constellation receive bulk deliveries of wine imported through Tilbury docks here, then take it by lorry to their bottling plant. Then the bottled wine is returned to the depot, and shipped out in containers. If you drink a bottle of Banrock Station, it has been through Parson Street Station, twice. This shows what can be done with the will and a bit of imagination, although it doesn't explain why the wine isn't imported straight into Avonmouth, nor why it isn't taken to Avonmouth by train. I'm not so familiar with the line from Swindon via Kemble - any similar commercial / industrial opportunities likely to be opened with the redoubling?
|
|
|
5121
|
Journey by Journey / TransWilts line / Re: Melksham Railway Development Group - AGM and future meetings
|
on: August 02, 2013, 20:44:26
|
Melksham Railway Development Group is funding the insertion of "Trains from Melksham" trifold brochure in the next issue of the Melksham Independent News, which is the free newspaper delivered to each household in the town. These brochures have been supplied to us (free of charge, Thank You) by First Great Western.
An excellent initiative! FGW▸ will hopefully attract sufficient new passengers to cover their costs.
|
|
|
5124
|
Journey by Journey / Bristol (WECA) Commuters / Re: First Passenger Train for 50 years?
|
on: August 02, 2013, 16:37:03
|
I travelled via the Henbury Loop from Patchway to Bristol Temple Meads in about 2004 when Filton Abbeywood was being re-modelled. One XC▸ and one Cardiff to Portsmouth Hbr (calling Stapleton Rd and Lawrence Hill) per hour being diverted that route and via Avonmouth. Because of pathing the normal Severn Beach line services were curtailed with bustitution.
Me too. Bargain of the century: I seem to remember the fare from Parkway to Temple Meads was ^1. Me too. We passed intercity traffic at Avonmouth and Clifton Down, something of an event.
|
|
|
5125
|
Journey by Journey / Swindon to Gloucester / Cheltenham / Re: Swindon to Kemble re-doubling - ongoing discussion and updates
|
on: August 02, 2013, 16:27:43
|
My thanks also, ST. Things are certainly moving, and we can expect big changes in the next few weeks.
I once planned a flight to Oaksey Park airfield, for my first landing on grass. In the event, I couldn't raise anyone on the phone, so we went to Kemble instead. I have just had a look at the airfield's circuit chart, and presciently, the railway line is shown as double! The current ICAO charts still have it as a single track - I hope someone tells them?
|
|
|
5126
|
All across the Great Western territory / Across the West / Re: Turbo refresh started.
|
on: July 31, 2013, 23:30:37
|
Business is far from easy, they tell me, but one would have thought that most firms fold for lack of contracts, rather than because of them. Getting a contract like this one singed is usually enough to see the MD sigh with relief, mop his brow, and phone the shipyard to say the yacht is still on. It looks as if they may have been holding out for a deal, and blinked first. If a German company was at one time interested, another German (or French or Italian or Spanish or..) may be interested again. Hopefully, the administrators will keep this job alive.
As for Brother Crow's comment, the Government can just sit on its hands. It has sat on them, and other peoples' hands, time and again. Sometimes, the Conservative half of the political marriage made in Heaven may sit on the hands of the other half. Whitehall has, however, realised that it has been had over by the multinational computer companies, something FT, N! first told them in 1984. Now, we read in our papers of how the Government has a completely new strategy for digital Britain where we directly employ some kidz in hoodies to do, well, stuff. Apparently, the private sector quoted ^30K to amend a logo, but our man(?) with the non-Whitehall haircut, and the unseasonably pale skin did it in 15 minutes.
I was a civil servant at the time the government decided to "outsource", and I know the progression. I have also been involved, in a non-programming way, with software development in certain crucial areas of public service. Now, the emphasis seems to be on in-house IT. Maybe that will transfer to hardware, especially after that Radio 4 programme about the perils of "Casualisation". BroCro may find that his opinion is justified, after all.
|
|
|
5129
|
All across the Great Western territory / Across the West / Re: Changes to cycle policy - 3/4 Aug 13
|
on: July 31, 2013, 20:20:39
|
Good for you! You'll be amazed how quickly your muscles get acclimatised to cycling again.
I presume you'll be in the market for lycra soon?
Why wouldn't you feel happy on the Bristol and Bath?
Muscles? I have aches in places where I didn't know I had places, let alone muscles. Being serious about the Bristol and Bath, I have tried walking on it - it is strictly supposed to be an amenity shared by cyclists and pedestrians. It did not go well, and could go a long way to explain some of my earlier, somewhat intemperate, language. As for Lycra, if it were all that there was to wear, I would go naked. People may say "Whatever he's wearing, he could've ironed it", and I may have to burn the saddle, but I draw the line before Lycra.
|
|
|
5130
|
Journey by Journey / Bristol (WECA) Commuters / Re: Bristol connections: Metro, Bus Rapid Transit, PTE, ITA and local councils - discussion
|
on: July 31, 2013, 20:09:01
|
The photomontages and artist's impressions rather bring home the point that FT,N! has made several times: This looks like a road with buses on, not a rapid transit route.
Not necessarily, Red Squirrel. There may yet not be buses, at least no more than the minimum necessary to persuade DafT that this isn't just a road building scheme. I too was a bit surprised to see on the N Som website that we were back to GRIP▸ 1. They claim that none of the previous work up to GRIP 3 will be wasted, and I get the impression that actually it's largely a matter of letting the rest of the MetroWest scheme catch up. But don't the wheels grind slowly! North Somerset DC▸ have just spent money on stripping the vegetation from the track, so that GRIP 4 can begin. Presumably, they will ask it not to grow again? My own pet conspiracy theory suggests that we were lucky to stop at GRIP 1. Portishead Railway was at one time scheduled to open in 2016, a year after Bust Rabid Transit. Whatever anyone might say, the BRT▸ programme has slipped quite heavily, and will probably slip again soon. The Public Inquiry report has not yet been released, 9 months after it was due. The first bit to open is BRT2, or AVTM, Ashton Vale to Temple Meads. The business case for this route is largely based upon being able to transport a substantial number of people from the Long Ashton Park and Ride to Temple Meads. Many of the current users come from Portishead and Pill, so if the railway was open, the justification for the BRT route would collapse.That in itself is no big deal, except that BRT2 is the sine qua non for the whole ridiculous Metrobust scheme. That in itself is nothing but a Trojan horse to get a couple of roads built, to ease the pain of businesses, whose heavy lorries have difficulty getting to and from the industrial estates. Portishead Railway, despite being cheaper, technically easier, less damaging, and popularly supported, could not be allowed to open first, or the DafT folks will see the empty Park and Ride, and the trains full of commuters, happy they no longer have to drive at all, and will say "Hang on a minute..." So each delay in Metrobust will be followed by the announcement of a further delay in the Portishead line. Only once 30 tonne lorries are able to drive over Highridge Common, along King Georges Road, and through the middle of Withywood will we be able to think about improvements to public transport. It's a scandal.
|
|
|
|