601
|
Journey by Journey / London to Swindon and Bristol / Re: Thingley Junctions (deliberate plural)
|
on: May 10, 2020, 15:23:53
|
I have just read through the notes I made on the Board of Trade inspections of the WSWR. The inspection for the opening in 1848 makes no mention of a west chord. It simply refers to there being no facing points on the main line. So the train had to reverse into a siding before taking the WSWR.
The other report is from 1875 after the narrowing of the gauge. Again no mention is made of a west chord, which one would expect, especially with respect to the arrangements at the junction
Thingley Junction and Bathampton Junctions (both mixed gauge) were provided with this weird single moveable blade point. Here the switch was on the common, outer rail. As the train took the points it moved onto the branch and the nearside wheels were dragged over the fixed nearside B-G rail onto the branch! The moveable rail acted as a check rail to guide the train to the branch. (The National Archives Rail 1053-57 BoT report on Narrowing of the Gauge 12/6/1875)
Accidents did happen and it was eventually scrapped.
|
|
|
602
|
Journey by Journey / London to Swindon and Bristol / Re: Thingley Junctions (deliberate plural)
|
on: May 10, 2020, 13:19:47
|
Colin Maggs in his book “The Bath to Weymouth line” suggests that the chord was laid out in the 1840s as an alternative to the Bathampton to Bradford route, which the GWR▸ /WSWR did not really want. However, like the south chord at Yeovil rails were not laid. Then in WWII▸ it became an alternative route in case of bomb damage. Relevant page attached
|
|
|
604
|
Journey by Journey / Portsmouth to Cardiff / Re: Brighton [Dotd 7.5.20]
|
on: May 09, 2020, 14:46:32
|
Have just found a photo of the upper level of the funicular railway at Devils Dyke, taken on a visit some years ago. It shows the base 'station' The second shows the Devil's Dyke itself, across which the aerial flight was constructed
|
|
|
606
|
All across the Great Western territory / Introductions and chat / Re: Just this once ...
|
on: May 07, 2020, 15:42:54
|
We loosely planned for our retirement when Marion and I got married almost 25 years ago. Then her retirement age was going to be 60. We took life decisions based on that and then, some years ago, were informed that her retirement age would now be 66. That shot serious holes in to the plan and meant that I was still supply teaching at 69, some four years ago.
It was this 6 year rise that has caught out so many of the mid-1950s women.
|
|
|
|