Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 06:55 27 Apr 2024
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

No 'On This Day' events reported for 27th Apr

Train RunningCancelled
27/04/24 12:01 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
27/04/24 13:51 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
Short Run
06:17 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
27/04/24 06:34 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Shrub Hill
27/04/24 06:34 Great Malvern to Bristol Temple Meads
06:38 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
27/04/24 06:55 Cheltenham Spa to Weymouth
07:33 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
27/04/24 10:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
27/04/24 11:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
12:02 Westbury to Gloucester
27/04/24 12:49 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
14:02 Westbury to Gloucester
14:10 Gloucester to Frome
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
27/04/24 14:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
27/04/24 15:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
17:43 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
18:12 Salisbury to Cheltenham Spa
18:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
19:13 Salisbury to Worcester Shrub Hill
Delayed
03:56 Swansea to London Paddington
05:15 Plymouth to Penzance
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 27, 2024, 07:11:41 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[133] Labour to nationalise railways within five years of coming to ...
[69] access for all at Devon stations report
[44] Who we are - the people behind firstgreatwestern.info
[16] Bonaparte's at Bristol Temple Meads
[2] Lack of rolling stock due to attacks on shipping in the Red Se...
[1] Cornish delays
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 39
  Print  
Author Topic: Railway bridges struck by road vehicles - merged topic, ongoing discussion  (Read 179675 times)
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #300 on: September 10, 2020, 13:11:59 »

Slightly fuller report from the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page)

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-54099591
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10119


View Profile
« Reply #301 on: September 10, 2020, 13:17:50 »

Without wishing to speculate, I guess bus drivers are fallible in the same way train drivers are when they have a stop short, in so much as they 'forget' how long their train is?  A bus driver could be mistakenly thinking their bus is a single decker - it only takes a few seconds.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40834



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #302 on: September 10, 2020, 13:28:25 »

Without wishing to speculate, I guess bus drivers are fallible in the same way train drivers are when they have a stop short, in so much as they 'forget' how long their train is?  A bus driver could be mistakenly thinking their bus is a single decker - it only takes a few seconds.

We have a number of double deck buses appearing on routes that are normally single deck in our area, and indeed a new school route D1X which is specially differed from the D1 to allow double decks on the Bath - Bradford-on-Avon - Trowbridge route which id normally limited because of the low bridge at Limpley Stoke.    I suspect that the risk of these things happening is higher at the moment with all the changes going on at short notice.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7170


View Profile
« Reply #303 on: September 10, 2020, 13:35:20 »

The latest Streetview, June 2019, shows the height warning sign is missing from one end of the bridge. I don't know whether the bus was approaching from that side. Even without that warning sign, it seems astonishing to think a double decker could fit under there.

https://goo.gl/maps/oSarBdKBs78ZWrkU7

The bus came from the other, eastern, side, where there is a height sign on the face of the bridge. There's a road narrows sign with "oncoming vehicles in middle of road" just before the bridge, and the bridge makes seeing those oncoming vehicles hard, so you'd not be unaware of it. There's also an advanced height limit warning sign that the bus must have passed, as well as one on the western approach, though neither is well positioned.
Logged
southwest
Guest
« Reply #304 on: September 10, 2020, 17:16:10 »

Without wishing to speculate, I guess bus drivers are fallible in the same way train drivers are when they have a stop short, in so much as they 'forget' how long their train is?  A bus driver could be mistakenly thinking their bus is a single decker - it only takes a few seconds.

Surely a picture of a double decker or saying the height of the bus somewhere in the drivers vision would be a simple solution to this?
Logged
GBM
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1483


View Profile Email
« Reply #305 on: September 10, 2020, 17:35:32 »

Surely a picture of a double decker or saying the height of the bus somewhere in the drivers vision would be a simple solution to this?
Most have a height sticker in the cab
Logged

Personal opinion only.  Writings not representative of any union, collective, management or employer. (Think that absolves me...........)
rogerw
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1343



View Profile
« Reply #306 on: September 10, 2020, 20:00:09 »

One in Bristol this afternoon. But not a railway bridge this time.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-54109763
« Last Edit: September 10, 2020, 20:06:39 by rogerw » Logged

I like to travel.  It lets me feel I'm getting somewhere.
CyclingSid
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1938


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #307 on: September 11, 2020, 06:54:57 »

Quote
Most have a height sticker in the cab

In the case of Reading Buses it is in millimetres, which might not immediately equate to the signs if you are used to working in Rees-Mog units.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7800



View Profile
« Reply #308 on: September 11, 2020, 08:01:17 »

Without wishing to speculate, I guess bus drivers are fallible in the same way train drivers are when they have a stop short, in so much as they 'forget' how long their train is?  A bus driver could be mistakenly thinking their bus is a single decker - it only takes a few seconds.

Without wishing to speculate, there's fallible, and then there's negligent.
Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5219


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #309 on: September 11, 2020, 09:57:11 »

The latest Streetview, June 2019, shows the height warning sign is missing from one end of the bridge. I don't know whether the bus was approaching from that side. Even without that warning sign, it seems astonishing to think a double decker could fit under there.

https://goo.gl/maps/oSarBdKBs78ZWrkU7

The bus came from the other, eastern, side, where there is a height sign on the face of the bridge. There's a road narrows sign with "oncoming vehicles in middle of road" just before the bridge, and the bridge makes seeing those oncoming vehicles hard, so you'd not be unaware of it. There's also an advanced height limit warning sign that the bus must have passed, as well as one on the western approach, though neither is well positioned.

Good safety systems accept that humans are fallible and try to remove the factors that lead to mistakes. Bad safety systems look for someone to blame and change nothing.

At a bare minimum, signage should be consistent, visible and well-maintained. The continued use of US customary units probably doesn't help.

There are 5 bridges strikes every day in the UK (United Kingdom). But we know how to design and maintain safe roads. We know how to detect over-height vehicles. It's right to bring bad drivers to book, but if we want to solve this issue we need to focus on prevention rather than scapegoating.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #310 on: September 11, 2020, 11:51:36 »

The continued use of US customary units probably doesn't help.

I really liked that bit - in school and work I have used metric units for over 50 years. In 1980 when I had to translate units for 60 year old site staff it was understandable, 40 years on not so. Even then the office staff were relieved when I finished the project for the new weigh bridge and they no longer had to teach the office juniors about tons, hundredweights (cwt)  and quarters! The people who did not learn them at school or at work must be diminishing to a very small number.

There are those who still call them Imperial Units, but we have not had an empire for longer than we have been using metric units and the countries that used to be in it don't so far as I am aware still use the old units. The only country that does, so far as I can tell, is the US and so "US customary units" seems to be the best description.

Logged
GBM
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1483


View Profile Email
« Reply #311 on: September 11, 2020, 12:16:42 »

Being very old, I was taught 'Imperial Units'.  I understood them.
When we changed to £p, that was easy.

When meat weights changed to kg/g and some measurements changed to m/mm, I still struggle, and prefer the old units.

Luddite yes Grin
Logged

Personal opinion only.  Writings not representative of any union, collective, management or employer. (Think that absolves me...........)
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #312 on: September 11, 2020, 13:10:19 »

Being very old, I was taught 'Imperial Units'.  I understood them.
When we changed to £p, that was easy.

When meat weights changed to kg/g and some measurements changed to m/mm, I still struggle, and prefer the old units.

Luddite yes Grin

I am only a couple of years off retirement and I was taught only in metric units at secondary school. I did learn the other units at primary school. Admittedly I have worked in a technical profession for all my career therefore using units on a day to day basis.  The UK (United Kingdom) construction and manufacturing industry officially went metric in 1970 - that's 50 years ago!

To have been through school learning only imperial units you would have had to be at least 70 and probably more. Only 15% of the population is over 70 and I am not sure very many of them will be driving buses or HGV's. Yet when local authorities try even to put both units on road signs they have been vilified by some lunatic fringe. 

On bridge heights it matters - it is a health and safety issue held back by nostalgia. 

Mercifully for weight limits it doesn't matter - don't tell people but actually they are already in metric tonnes!*

*However 1 tonne =0.984207 uk tons (for a civil engineer that means no difference) = 1.10231 us customary tons (now that does make a difference). 
« Last Edit: September 11, 2020, 13:21:31 by ellendune » Logged
southwest
Guest
« Reply #313 on: September 11, 2020, 13:28:45 »

Surely a picture of a double decker or saying the height of the bus somewhere in the drivers vision would be a simple solution to this?
Most have a height sticker in the cab

Yeah I believe it's at the top of the cab, out of the drivers line of vision. Surely having something within the line of vision that doesn't impede their view would solve it. Single Decker icons for Single Deckers, Double for Double deckers. Something that is a quick reference.
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6438


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #314 on: September 11, 2020, 13:42:44 »

At a bare minimum, signage should be consistent, visible and well-maintained. The continued use of US customary units probably doesn't help.

Many drivers have come to work in the UK (United Kingdom) from abroad, and our quaint archaic units are a second language to them. I was in the first year at my school to do physics education in metric, and unlike elledunne, I have already retired, so there is no need to confuse our own young people with the so-called Imperial units. They should be the sole preserve of the US , and all the other countries that still use Fahrenheit and inches of quicksilver. (OK, just the US.)
Logged

Now, please!
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 39
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page