Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 22:55 29 Apr 2024
- Met to pay damages to French publisher over arrest
- Power cut causes disruption at Stansted Airport
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Apr (1963)
Bristol Bus Boycott announced (*)

Train RunningNo cancellations or delays
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 29, 2024, 23:12:49 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[145] Where was I today, 29.04.24?
[109] Clan Line - by Clan Line !
[93] South Western Railways Waterloo - Bristol services axed
[92] Saturdays: Rochdale / Manchester onto the Settle and Carlisle
[57] Visiting the pub on the way home.
[34] Disabled access at Cholsey: time for a campaign!
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Why would an extra platform cost 6 million pounds?  (Read 9293 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40846



View Profile WWW Email
« on: September 24, 2013, 09:06:57 »

I'm trying to get some figures to add up ... I'm seeing 45 million for the redoubling from Swindon to Kemble, and 6 million for re-instating a track against the bare platform face in Westbury.

Passenger trains can already use the extra line that's away from the platform edge in Westbury, as happened when a 150 split the points and close platforms 1 and 2 and cut off access to the Salisbury line from platform 3, so all that's really needed is a slewing of the tracks as far as I can make out. The platform face has every appearance of being in good nick. So how does that come to 6 million pounds?   For seven times that amount they're slewing 15 miles of track and adding a second track to the north of the county,  and there's lots of impressive engineering works involved with that too as we've seen from some of the excellent pictures on here. 



P.S.  For 6 million you could build 30 to 40 rather nice houses ... I looked that up to help put it in context!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: September 24, 2013, 10:31:23 »

Didn't the entire reconstruction of Fishguard & Goodwick station (complete with new building just for looks which doesn't have any of the character of the original and doesn't do the original justice at all) cost less than ^1m? That included resurfacing of the platform AND slewing the track, though at Westbury an additional track might be planned rather than slewing the one that is there. Since it isn't next to the platform at the moment, there must be a reason for it not to be a platform line.

Could be worth challanging that cost, even if they have to put in an extra line I can't see why it would cost much more than a 15th of the cost of redoubling 15 miles of track. Unless they have to close Westbury station to do it and the ^6m covers compensation for not being able to run trains.
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
chuffed
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1502


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: September 24, 2013, 15:03:02 »

If one uses the Portishead line saga as an example, by far the greatest cost will be all the 'consultants' lawyers, appeals counter appeals, judicial reviews etc etc etc, not to mention all the over engineering and elfn safety... a bottomless pit or so it appears. The Chinese would just get on and do it all in a fortnight.
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: September 24, 2013, 17:32:26 »

They regauged the whole of the West in one weekend so the Westbury slew should be about 12 hours!
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: September 24, 2013, 17:56:19 »

Couldn't you extend the platform face out to the track?

Some of the cost could be if the line needs to be resignalled to be bidirectional if it's currently not, but it still sounds pricey.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5319


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: September 24, 2013, 18:15:47 »

They may want to keep the existing freight loop capability outside of the new platform line though? 

Unless there's some exact details forthcoming of exactly what they want to achieve, it'll be difficult to work out, but suppose they want a few signals, a few sets of points, and potentially existing signalling altered from freight to passenger standards etc.  It all starts adding up.  Then maybe a relatively fast new route across the existing east end layout to allow trains into the new platform road having come from the Trowbridge direction - a couple of new crossovers or more?

I can't remember the exact figure given in one of the railway magazines for what was called a 'signalling equivalent unit' (SEU), where any random SEU was given an average deemed cost, be it a set of points, or a signal, or anything to do with signalling.   The SEU cost would include all the alterations to interlocking, the signaller's displays, controls, communications changes TPWS (Train Protection and Warning System), ATP (Automatic Train Protection), AWS (Automatic Warning System) etc etc, and was hundreds of thousands per SEU.

Paul
Logged
Nibat
Full Member
***
Posts: 38


View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: September 24, 2013, 19:32:24 »

I don't know how much of what I'm going to say is true, but it's what I've always been told when mentioning platdorm lengthening and the costs implied...

Apparently, when NR» (Network Rail - home page) does any work on a platform, then it is consider a station modernization and all the disability access regulations must be followed for the resulting 'new' station.  So to put that platform back in service will mean that the whole station loses the old bulding excemptions and the whole station must be made disable accessible.

So that's why NR almost never does any work on any old station platform without lifts or ramps already fitted...

But, as I said, it could all be a lie that somehow makes some sense to me!   Huh
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18924



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: September 24, 2013, 19:55:20 »

Well, Westbury already has lifts installed. One of which will give access to this platform face.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
thetrout
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2612



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: September 25, 2013, 05:09:31 »

A member of station staff said there were several issues with the 4th platform at Westbury.

Apparently there are alot of cables between the platform and track which means that the platform can't just be extended out.

But when they move the track they are presented with the same problem so have to move the cables anyway.

I don't know if WSB» (Westbury - next trains) has listed building status as altering the platform may cause this to be an issue so both track and cables must be moved.

Of course I am only quoting what a staff member said to me a few months ago so I cannot say for definite if that's true or not...?!

Logged

Grin Grin Grin Grin
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4453


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: September 25, 2013, 07:30:20 »

Th station does not appear to be listed.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page