Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 10:35 29 Apr 2024
- End of the road for 'Banksie' pothole campaigner
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Apr (1963)
Bristol Bus Boycott announced (*)

Train RunningCancelled
11:12 Reading to Newbury
Short Run
07:00 Gloucester to Plymouth
09:23 Swansea to London Paddington
11:54 Newbury to London Paddington
12:11 Newbury to Reading
14:02 Oxford to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 29, 2024, 10:52:18 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[126] Clan Line - by Clan Line !
[69] Visiting the pub on the way home.
[57] Labour to nationalise railways within five years of coming to ...
[54] Cornish delays
[14] South Western Railways Waterloo - Bristol services axed
[13] access for all at Devon stations report
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Major Signalling Problems London to Slough - 20 Nov 13  (Read 6487 times)
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 9843



View Profile
« on: November 20, 2013, 13:02:39 »

Some major problems with signalling between London Paddington and Slough,

Only two lines are open (the up and down main).

Usual scaling back of services.  Greenford branch suspended and some services to and from Oxford skipping stops between Hayes and Paddington.  Also some Bedwyn services cancelled between London and Reading.

Not connected with this, there have been problems between Reading and Didcot Parkway all morning because of poor rail conditions.  Delays of around 20 minutes for services heading towards Swindon have been typical.

Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12366


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2013, 13:51:50 »

Also, suspension of service Gloucester - Swindon earlymorning two days running, I think because of signal problems
Logged
lordgoata
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 415



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 20, 2013, 15:09:31 »

And now:

Swindon Control Centre EVACUATED

The Integrated Control Centre (Western) is evacuating due to the fire alarms sounding.

(snip)

Further advice will be given when we return or have setup an emergency Control Centre.

Mod edit: Various mobile numbers quoted for internal use have been deleted.
« Last Edit: November 20, 2013, 15:11:33 by bobm » Logged
lordgoata
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 415



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: November 20, 2013, 18:26:34 »

Apologies for posting them, I copied it straight from JourneyCheck so I guess it was posted there by mistake.

Thanks for editing bobm, and also to Chris for the PM explaining what happened.
Logged
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 9843



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: November 20, 2013, 18:40:34 »

I must admit I didn't realise they were publically available on Journeycheck, however best we don't perpetuate the error.

Thank you for your understanding lordgoata.

Logged
BBM
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 634


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: November 21, 2013, 09:30:33 »

Fortunately I didn't have too many problems getting home last night, however at the moment the punctuality of my daily journeys appears to be suffering due to various TSRs (Temporary Speed Restriction). There's already a long-standing one on the UM at Slough and another on the DM at Southall, now there are TSRs on both lines just to the west of Ealing Broadway. The 1706 from PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains) which I take to TWY (Twyford station) is now regularly about 5 minutes late which although is only a minor annoyance to me, I've noticed it's causing regular problems with the Henley branch connection.

Is there any information available on how long these TSRs will each continue to last?
Logged
Network SouthEast
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 492



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: November 21, 2013, 11:54:49 »

Fortunately I didn't have too many problems getting home last night, however at the moment the punctuality of my daily journeys appears to be suffering due to various TSRs (Temporary Speed Restriction). There's already a long-standing one on the UM at Slough and another on the DM at Southall, now there are TSRs on both lines just to the west of Ealing Broadway. The 1706 from PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains) which I take to TWY (Twyford station) is now regularly about 5 minutes late which although is only a minor annoyance to me, I've noticed it's causing regular problems with the Henley branch connection.
The TSR on the up main at Slough has now been removed.

There has been a TSR on the down main at Ealing Broadway for a long time, however it was 100mph, so barely noticeable. However, this has recently been reduced to 50mph. The problem for an HST (High Speed Train), which you'll probably have noticed, is that it isn't possible to get up to 125mph once out of Ealing Broadway before it has to start braking for the Southall TSR.
Quote
Is there any information available on how long these TSRs will each continue to last?
Generally speaking, Network Rail only publish (in private) end dates of TSRs if they are to enable a specific piece of engineering work to take place. If it is for another reason then they can have no fixed end date.
Logged
thetrout
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2612



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: November 21, 2013, 17:08:22 »

Also fairly significant signalling problems in Frome yesterday. 21:37 FRO» (Frome - next trains) - Bristol Temple Meads was cancelled (Skipped Frome AFAIK (as far as I know)) and the 20:49 BRI» (Bristol Temple Meads - next trains) - Weymouth also skipping Frome.

I'll see the Guard of that train next week who will no doubt fill me in on what happened Lips sealed

And Signalling Problems today at Acton Main Line... Not very good FGW (First Great Western) week by the sounds of of things!
Logged

Grin Grin Grin Grin
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7800



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: November 21, 2013, 18:51:28 »

....make that 21st November too.....bear in mind now that it's got a little bit colder and there are a few leaves blowing around, that together with the evenings drawing in inevitably means that everything will start to fail  Roll Eyes ............seriously though, last few days have not been good.........the signalling along the routes out of Paddington into the Thames Valley seems incredibly fragile.
Logged
AMLAG
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 229


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: November 21, 2013, 20:55:45 »

Hardly a week goes by without significant or major signalling problems somewhere between Paddington and Reading,
causing often vast numbers of passengers to have their journey plans seriously delayed and disrupted.
It is interesting that the chances of these signalling problems happening during weekday daytimes seems greater than at other times..why ? ..this is when Network Rail staff and their contractors/sub contractors are out and about.

A few years ago Network Rail 'rationalised' their Signalling maintenance staff in the London area with resultant often slower responses to a problem as staff had to travel further/even across London to site.
Any money saved seems to clearly have been 'small fry' compared to the ongoing cost of delay payments to Train Operators.
Paddington to Reading must surely be the contender for the 2012-13 award for the most signalling problematic major rail route in Britain?
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: November 21, 2013, 21:11:49 »

Yesterday's PPM(resolve) for HSS (High Speed Services) was a meagre 35% according to FGW (First Great Western).co.uk.   Somewhat less than the target of 90%. Never mind, the last month's dire performance has guaranteed a 5% discount when I renew in January.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7172


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: November 21, 2013, 22:29:39 »

Hardly a week goes by without significant or major signalling problems somewhere between Paddington and Reading,
causing often vast numbers of passengers to have their journey plans seriously delayed and disrupted.
It is interesting that the chances of these signalling problems happening during weekday daytimes seems greater than at other times..why ? ..this is when Network Rail staff and their contractors/sub contractors are out and about.

A few years ago Network Rail 'rationalised' their Signalling maintenance staff in the London area with resultant often slower responses to a problem as staff had to travel further/even across London to site.
Any money saved seems to clearly have been 'small fry' compared to the ongoing cost of delay payments to Train Operators.
Paddington to Reading must surely be the contender for the 2012-13 award for the most signalling problematic major rail route in Britain?

I was at a lecture last night by the Western Route Asset Manager (signalling) on the current modernisation programme. At the end, I asked him about reliability - basically that faults now are far too common. the renewal programme involves a huge number of new connections made at trackside, so how much will it eventually improve? The answer only had one clear point: that initially it would get worse. That was followed by a load of stuff about how reliability is managed, which did not really answer the question. Perhaps I should have asked what level of reliability other railways achieve, and how close NR» (Network Rail - home page) would get to that.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page