Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 13:15 30 Apr 2024
- BBC on board Philippine ship hit by Chinese water cannon
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
30th Apr (1972)
Brighton Belle withdrawn (link)

Train RunningCancelled
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:21 Newbury to London Paddington
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
12:53 Basingstoke to Reading
13:07 Reading to Basingstoke
13:09 Newbury to Reading
13:12 Reading to Newbury
13:28 Basingstoke to Reading
13:54 Newbury to London Paddington
13:54 Basingstoke to Reading
14:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
Short Run
11:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
13:05 London Paddington to Newbury
13:18 Hereford to London Paddington
Delayed
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
11:54 Newbury to London Paddington
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:48 London Paddington to Swansea
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:21 Newbury to Bedwyn
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 30, 2024, 13:21:45 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[106] Where was I today, 29.04.24?
[78] Visiting the pub on the way home.
[56] Train drivers "overwhelmingly white middle aged men"
[53] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[40] Clan Line - by Clan Line !
[34] South Western Railways Waterloo - Bristol services axed
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
  Print  
Author Topic: First to Lose Franchise ( Rumour )  (Read 20226 times)
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #30 on: January 10, 2008, 19:21:49 »

I hope the rumour is true, but perfect timing!

First have just about finished applying their "dynamic lines" to all their HS (High Speed (short for HSS (High Speed Services) High Speed Services)) trains!

They are starting on that dreradful livery for the "West" fleet. The Wessex one looked nicer, and you could actually read what was being said!

In my opinion, the new livery looks wrong on the Thames Turbos, the Thames Train/ FGWL livery looked "loads" better.

It will all have to be replaced. All that money wasted!

What is it with First Group and "Dynamic Lines?"

But it is just a rumour.....
Logged
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: January 10, 2008, 19:24:52 »

The fleet would look much better in plain blue like the power cars! Mind you, on the MKIII coaches the all over blue is painted and the dynamic lines are vinyl so if they did lose the franchise then they could just take off the dynamic lines!
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #32 on: January 10, 2008, 19:27:31 »

Personally I think the FGW (First Great Western) livery is very smart, and shows an identity. Meanwhile Wessex trains simply advertised places and the livery applied to the 158s wasn't exactly lavish. FGW interiors are also better. Pink and Grey really are quite depressing colours, whereas blue is uplifting. At least FGW havn't spent all the money on instantly reliverying their fleet.
 
If the franchise is lost, it won't simple be 'given' to Virgin, what would Virgin bring apart from maybe buying crap new trains, or perhaps making HSTs (High Speed Train) 4 car  Roll Eyes

Any franchise change would make the situation worse as its very fragile as it is!

Logged
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: January 10, 2008, 19:32:52 »

Personally I think the FGW (First Great Western) livery is very smart, and shows an identity. Meanwhile Wessex trains simply advertised places and the livery applied to the 158s wasn't exactly lavish. FGW interiors are also better. Pink and Grey really are quite depressing colours, whereas blue is uplifting. At least FGW havn't spent all the money on instantly reliverying their fleet.
 
If the franchise is lost, it won't simple be 'given' to Virgin, what would Virgin bring apart from maybe buying crap new trains, or perhaps making HSTs (High Speed Train) 4 car  Roll Eyes

Any franchise change would make the situation worse as its very fragile as it is!


Very true, I posted somewhere else that everything would be put on hold if they lost the franchise, including staff recruitment!
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #34 on: January 10, 2008, 19:37:00 »

I like the HST (High Speed Train) livery (well its ok).

I hate the West livery- it is dreadful compared to Wessex's promotions.

I hated the "Aphaline" livery and the PinkGrey seats as well. Blue is better.
Logged
smokey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1129


View Profile
« Reply #35 on: January 10, 2008, 19:37:22 »

My own thoughts are that First is making a Right Pigs Ear out of this franchise, however It would seem unlikely for DfT» (Department for Transport - about) to take back the Keys as First Haven't gone knocking on DfT's door asking for "MORE"*

As for Virgin taking over WELL JUST REMEMBER that VIRGIN hiked the CROSS COUNTRY FARES UP MORE than any other TOC (Train Operating Company) did.
And the Vomet Comet's are awful unit's with a rather unpleasent toilet problem which means that leakage from the toilet vacuum pipes is getting under the carpets, at least on some units. NO wonder they HUM.

* Sorry to the estate of Mr C .Dickens for any copywrite problem.
« Last Edit: January 10, 2008, 19:39:24 by smokey » Logged
dog box
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 653


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: January 10, 2008, 21:20:20 »

I hope the rumour is true, but perfect timing!

First have just about finished applying their "dynamic lines" to all their HS (High Speed (short for HSS (High Speed Services) High Speed Services)) trains!

They are starting on that dreradful livery for the "West" fleet. The Wessex one looked nicer, and you could actually read what was being said!

In my opinion, the new livery looks wrong on the Thames Turbos, the Thames Train/ FGWL livery looked "loads" better.

It will all have to be replaced. All that money wasted!

What is it with First Group and "Dynamic Lines?"

But it is just a rumour.....

Wessex livery better ..you must have lost the plot!!!!......that horrible visit Bristol livery, the 158 with Richard trevithick plastered over it complete with a 8 foot high steam engine ,the pale blue dogbox,and the 150s in maroon with big maps on them the local graffitti artists could do better ........and to top it all the Awlfuline 158 with red/pink seats in it which is probably the most uncomfortable unit of all time
Logged

All postings reflect my own personal views and opinions and are not intended to be, nor should be taken as official statements of first great western or first group policy
Shazz
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 534


View Profile
« Reply #37 on: January 10, 2008, 21:27:00 »

My own thoughts are that First is making a Right Pigs Ear out of this franchise, however It would seem unlikely for DfT» (Department for Transport - about) to take back the Keys as First Haven't gone knocking on DfT's door asking for "MORE"*

As for Virgin taking over WELL JUST REMEMBER that VIRGIN hiked the CROSS COUNTRY FARES UP MORE than any other TOC (Train Operating Company) did.
And the Vomet Comet's are awful unit's with a rather unpleasent toilet problem which means that leakage from the toilet vacuum pipes is getting under the carpets, at least on some units. NO wonder they HUM.

Sure, they might have increase fares, but dear god they transformed the franchise from what it used to be, into one of the most succesful if not the most succesful franchises in the country.

I still regard the Voyagers as some of the best stock in the country, give them a couple of extra carriages and dear god they'd be awesome. I fail to see what you winge on about. Sure they have/ had a few design issues, but these have been ironed out overtime if and were possible.
Logged
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #38 on: January 10, 2008, 21:51:35 »

When ATW (Arriva Trains Wales (former TOC (Train Operating Company))) used to run their Pnz-Man Picc service back in the good old days, I used to take that train up to Crewe over a Vomit comet even though it took over an hour longer! 158 vs Vomit comet?Huh 158 wins hands down!
Logged
swlines
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1178


View Profile Email
« Reply #39 on: January 10, 2008, 22:15:31 »

Right - further look at how SWT (South West Trains) won't be taking over the Pompey Cardiff route (although I have now heard it from one of my sources, I suspect they got it from here) - all comparisons are SX:

Class 158 fleet
11 units, of which 5 are allocated for usage until further notice (next December).
6 remaining units to play around with, 2 are currently away in the East Midlands covering EM Connect duties.
4 remaning after that, of which 2 are generally under maintenance. Until the 159 refurbishment programme is finished, I suspect the remaning 2 will all be allocated for usage on West of England line services.

Class 159 fleet
30 units, of which 24 are allocated for usage until further notice (next December).
6 remaining units to play around with of which 4 are generally under maintenance. There are 2 units currently away under refurbishment which gives us 1 unit to play around with as a remainder. Also, some of the 158 and 159s are currently at Eastleigh for PIS (Passenger Information System) mods.

Should SWT take it over - I suspect that the same old problems would remain. With the WoE upgrade program under consideration currently unit requirements will increase by about 3 159s I suspect, and 2 of the current 6-coach 159s into London Waterloo will get enhanced with 4 158s to make them 10-car trains - this is very much in the future though as 10 coach or longer trains are not currently permitted to stop at any station beyond Basingstoke on the West of England line.
Logged
mada
Guest
« Reply #40 on: January 10, 2008, 22:24:57 »

Right - further look at how SWT (South West Trains) won't be taking over the Pompey Cardiff route (although I have now heard it from one of my sources, I suspect they got it from here) - all comparisons are SX:

Class 158 fleet
11 units, of which 5 are allocated for usage until further notice (next December).
6 remaining units to play around with, 2 are currently away in the East Midlands covering EM Connect duties.
4 remaning after that, of which 2 are generally under maintenance. Until the 159 refurbishment programme is finished, I suspect the remaning 2 will all be allocated for usage on West of England line services.

Class 159 fleet
30 units, of which 24 are allocated for usage until further notice (next December).
6 remaining units to play around with of which 4 are generally under maintenance. There are 2 units currently away under refurbishment which gives us 1 unit to play around with as a remainder. Also, some of the 158 and 159s are currently at Eastleigh for PIS (Passenger Information System) mods.

Should SWT take it over - I suspect that the same old problems would remain. With the WoE upgrade program under consideration currently unit requirements will increase by about 3 159s I suspect, and 2 of the current 6-coach 159s into London Waterloo will get enhanced with 4 158s to make them 10-car trains - this is very much in the future though as 10 coach or longer trains are not currently permitted to stop at any station beyond Basingstoke on the West of England line.

Could FGW (First Great Western) sublet routes or even the entire "West Local" franchise to another TOC (Train Operating Company)? I know that Virgin used to sub contract Wessex to run a couple of routes which didn't fit into their masterplan. Ideas on a postcard?
Logged
swlines
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1178


View Profile Email
« Reply #41 on: January 10, 2008, 22:26:48 »

It's entirely possible but if I highly doubt FGW (First Great Western) are willing to admit defeat that easily.
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #42 on: January 11, 2008, 09:05:47 »

Seems unfair whilst we are stretched for stock, SWT (South West Trains) have it lying around.

Note to any DafT members reading - Give some of them to us...
Logged
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #43 on: January 11, 2008, 11:29:38 »

Why don't FGW (First Great Western) hire a couple of their 158's, short term fix!
Logged
smokey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1129


View Profile
« Reply #44 on: January 11, 2008, 16:53:12 »

I'll be the most surprised man going if First keep this Franchise for it's due term, which I think is 7 years and a possible 3 year extension. Well it's almost 2 years down with 5 to go. (Sorry if I got the length of franchise wrong), Well there's a Rumour also going aroung that FGW (First Great Western)'s passenger TAXI bill for missed connections and cancelled trains is almost ^2million since April 2007.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page