Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 13:15 29 Apr 2024
* Depardieu in custody over sexual assault allegations
- End of the road for 'Banksie' pothole campaigner
* Pete Waterman's team breaks model railway record
* Power cut causes disruption at Stansted Airport
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Apr (1973)
Patent award for Janney (Buckeye) coupling (*)

Train RunningCancelled
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
14:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
Short Run
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:02 Oxford to London Paddington
Delayed
09:10 Penzance to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 29, 2024, 13:15:39 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[164] Clan Line - by Clan Line !
[61] Visiting the pub on the way home.
[56] Saturdays: Rochdale / Manchester onto the Settle and Carlisle
[50] Labour to nationalise railways within five years of coming to ...
[47] Cornish delays
[12] South Western Railways Waterloo - Bristol services axed
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3
  Print  
Author Topic: Yes you can. You pay. Then no, you can't.  (Read 19494 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40845



View Profile WWW Email
« on: August 29, 2014, 13:07:51 »

Would welcome views / comments on this scenario, as reported to me by a person who had cycled from Melksham to another Wiltshire town and wanted to get the train back from there.

a) Person goes to station and asks at booking office if she can take her cycle on the train at xx:xx (next train) to Trowbridge.   Told, yes, she can.

b) Buys ticket

c) Is then denied boarding

Travels on next train to Trowbridge, missing Melksham connection.

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Phil
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2044



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 29, 2014, 14:20:21 »

My understanding is that the person was also very concerned because the delay meant that their car parking ticket over-ran - luckily for them however the parking authorities weren't on the ball that day, so the fine was avoided. It would be interesting to see if the fine could have been claimed back in full or in part though (doubt it somehow)
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18924



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: August 29, 2014, 16:38:22 »

Cycle space is always subject to availability. That should be communicated to a passenger making such a query though.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40845



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #3 on: August 29, 2014, 16:45:01 »

Cycle space is always subject to availability. That should be communicated to a passenger making such a query though.

... agreed.   But it was NOT communicated - they were given the clear indication that they would be able to take their cycles on the train at XX:XX, without any caveats, and on that basis entered into a contract to travel y purchasing a ticket.

Very interesting ... in that I have been talking about cycles on trains with a member of the TOC (Train Operating Company) team this afternoon, and cycles is such an emotive subject with them that I would suggest that it's one of the more difficult areas for interested parties to discuss positively and dispassionately!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
SDS
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 772


Badgerline


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: August 29, 2014, 17:03:22 »

Sorry but the train was apparently full.

Logged

I do not work for FGW (First Great Western) and posts should not be assumed and do not imply they are statements, unless explicitly stated that they are, from any TOC (Train Operating Company) including First Great Western.
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1209


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: August 29, 2014, 18:21:35 »

What you can't see in SDS's pic is that the designated cycle space is just out of shot and is full up with suitcases...
Logged
thetrout
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2612



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: August 29, 2014, 18:37:42 »

You should see what happens when someone boards a Class 150/2 with a 4th Bike. Then 2 stops up the line, someone with a Wheelchair wants to board. But a bike is now in the Wheelchair space... Roll Eyes

It put the conductor in a very difficult position and I think she had to make the decision of who she was going to annoy the least!
Logged

Grin Grin Grin Grin
SDS
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 772


Badgerline


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: August 29, 2014, 20:23:53 »

Easy

The Equality Act protects the Mobility Impaired customer. It Doesn't protect the Cyclist. So off goes the Cyclist. It all reality the 4th bike shouldn't have been allowed on in the first place 'just in case' their is a wheelchair.
Logged

I do not work for FGW (First Great Western) and posts should not be assumed and do not imply they are statements, unless explicitly stated that they are, from any TOC (Train Operating Company) including First Great Western.
lordgoata
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 415



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: August 29, 2014, 20:35:51 »

Easy

The Equality Act protects the Mobility Impaired customer. It Doesn't protect the Cyclist. So off goes the Cyclist. It all reality the 4th bike shouldn't have been allowed on in the first place 'just in case' their is a wheelchair.


Hardly equality then is it!  Wink

As an avid cyclist, full size cycles on trains p*ss me right off. They should either add space, or just ban the lot. Personally I would have converted the 1st classes on the Turbos to cycle areas, and anyone with a bike (inc folding) made to stand in there with the bikes - that would have freed up even more seats!

Even when the rules state no bikes, none of the staff stop people with them. There was a poster up at Maidenhead for months saying no bikes on Turbos that arrive at Paddington before 9:30 (I think it was), but I only ever once saw someone being stopped (and physically dragged off) - but that was when the 180 was replaced with a (2 car if I recall) turbo.

There is some guy that gets off at Maidenhead who hoiks up his full size bike onto his shoulder in the vestibule before getting off - he almost hit me so many times I moved to another area on the train just to avoid the idiot.
Logged
Phil
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2044



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: August 29, 2014, 21:25:40 »

Easy

The Equality Act protects the Mobility Impaired customer. It Doesn't protect the Cyclist. So off goes the Cyclist. It all reality the 4th bike shouldn't have been allowed on in the first place 'just in case' their is a wheelchair.


So what happens if there's, for example, no bikes but several wheelchairs? What happens if the Lower Moulding on the Scroat Wheelchair Users' Club decides to have an outing by train one day, and all 12 of them turn up at once? Are they all protected, and the TOC (Train Operating Company) required to start removing seats to make space for them?
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4453


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: August 29, 2014, 21:47:27 »

The point is that a bike is luggage and therefore discretionary. And if not a folding bike very large luggage. The bike user can travel without his/her bike. A wheelchair is essential for the user to travel. There is no contest.

Logged
SDS
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 772


Badgerline


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: August 29, 2014, 21:49:56 »

Easy

The Equality Act protects the Mobility Impaired customer. It Doesn't protect the Cyclist. So off goes the Cyclist. It all reality the 4th bike shouldn't have been allowed on in the first place 'just in case' their is a wheelchair.


So what happens if there's, for example, no bikes but several wheelchairs? What happens if the Lower Moulding on the Scroat Wheelchair Users' Club decides to have an outing by train one day, and all 12 of them turn up at once? Are they all protected, and the TOC (Train Operating Company) required to start removing seats to make space for them?

I think the "Reasonable Adjustments" under domestic law would come into play on this one. But even then under European Law FGW (First Great Western) would have to find alternative transport for them.
Cyclists should be completely and utterly banned, no exceptions. I dont care if you got a ^27.47bn brompton bike or a 99p folding bike from halfords or a ^9.99 full man-sized bike. Trains are for humans (term used loosely in accordance with the great unwashed of Reading and Glastonbury festivals) and not for stupid bikes.
Logged

I do not work for FGW (First Great Western) and posts should not be assumed and do not imply they are statements, unless explicitly stated that they are, from any TOC (Train Operating Company) including First Great Western.
CLPGMS
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 155


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: August 29, 2014, 22:45:50 »

Another problem with bikes is short platforms.  For example, due to the positioning of a signal at the end of the UP platform, HSTs (High Speed Train) calling at Evesham station have coach A (in which the cycle space is provided) 3 or 4 coaches beyond the end of it.  Train Managers usually allow bikes to be stored in the vestibules of the front 4 coaches and, if someone boards at Evesham with a bike, I have seen the train delayed at the next suitable station so that the bike can be moved to the correct place.  In Evesham's case, the next station is Honeybourne.  Here, there can be a problem with bikes stored in the rear portion of a Class 180 on trains heading towards Worcester.  The DOWN platform is only 3 coaches long. On occasions, the Train Manager has had to request the driver to draw forward to allow a bike to be removed from the train.  This results in delays.
Logged
Alan Pettitt
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 229


View Profile Email
« Reply #13 on: August 30, 2014, 00:38:52 »

The last time I took a bike on a train, some 45 years ago, it was a piece of cake, simply paid for a ticket for the bike, train arrived at Preston Park, put bike in guard's van, got on train,  got off East Croydon, sorted. I think the bike ticket cost as much as my child's fare, but I can't really remember.  Stupid idea to get rid of guard's compartments, and fares for bikes.
Logged
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1209


View Profile Email
« Reply #14 on: August 30, 2014, 09:27:36 »

Cyclists should be completely and utterly banned, no exceptions.

I do not work for FGW (First Great Western)

Thank goodness for that!
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2 3
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page