Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 11:55 27 Apr 2024
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

No 'On This Day' events reported for 27th Apr

Train RunningCancelled
27/04/24 12:01 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
27/04/24 13:51 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
13:52 St Erth to St Ives
14:06 St Ives to St Erth
Short Run
09:58 Great Malvern to London Paddington
27/04/24 11:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
12:02 Westbury to Gloucester
27/04/24 12:49 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
12:52 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
14:02 Westbury to Gloucester
14:10 Gloucester to Frome
27/04/24 14:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
14:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
27/04/24 15:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
17:43 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
18:12 Salisbury to Cheltenham Spa
18:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
19:13 Salisbury to Worcester Shrub Hill
Delayed
08:51 Penzance to Cardiff Central
11:12 Salisbury to Worcester Foregate Street
13:22 St Erth to St Ives
13:36 St Ives to St Erth
15:59 Cardiff Central to Taunton
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 20:57 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 27, 2024, 12:14:34 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[97] Labour to nationalise railways within five years of coming to ...
[50] access for all at Devon stations report
[32] Who we are - the people behind firstgreatwestern.info
[11] Bonaparte's at Bristol Temple Meads
[2] Lack of rolling stock due to attacks on shipping in the Red Se...
[1] Cornish delays
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
  Print  
Author Topic: Didcot Parkway - timetable changes, incidents, barriers and forecourt improvements  (Read 54952 times)
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5318


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: January 17, 2012, 21:08:50 »

From the Oxford Mail:

Quote
Network Rail spokesman Sam Kelly said a complete rebuild was not part of its current plans, but it would ^gladly discuss it^ with the council.

She added: ^In terms of the station itself, we will be working with First Great Western, Oxfordshire County Council and Oxford City Council to review passenger flow through the station to provide better facilities in the future.

Yet only 7 months ago Network Rail's GWML (Great Western Main Line) RUS (Route Utilisation Strategy) was pretty upbeat about providing additional platform capacity at Oxford, to be done in conjunction with the next resignalling.  It even has a drawing of a twin island platform layout for Oxford Station in Appendix E...

Paul


Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10119


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: January 17, 2012, 21:31:51 »

Something does have to be done.  It's ridiculous that the main route towards Didcot/Reading/London only has one platform that trains can depart from.  Though a complete rebuild of that nature, with two new islands and a new concourse, would be very expensive.  Perhaps the south facing bay platform and an additional crossover and signal so that trains can also depart towards Didcot from platform 2 (in conjunction with the other facets of the Oxford Corridor enhancements that NR» (Network Rail - home page) have recently been talking about) would be better value for money?
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5318


View Profile
« Reply #32 on: January 17, 2012, 21:40:21 »

If I was starting with a clean piece of paper, I think I'd suggest a new platform face on the back of the down island for through down trains, leaving the existing face for some terminating trains, which could then start back south from that platform as you propose. 

With the up side bay as well (on the car park as previously proposed) that should provide a fair amount of capacity increase - and without actually having to rebuild the main station entrance?

Paul
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10119


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: January 17, 2012, 21:49:54 »

Yes, that would be a half-way house scheme they could consider.  After all, the panel box would no longer be in the way once its area of control transfers to Didcot.

From the Oxford Mail:
Quote
And it commits the council to investigate reinstatement of the rail link between Oxford, Witney and Carterton, to improve connections with the west Oxfordshire towns and RAF (Royal Air Force) Brize Norton.

They could save a little money by not bothering to progress that idea though.  13 miles of new track to serve two places with a combined population of only just over 30000?  Not a chance of it ever being financially viable with (the usual problem) of housing and business parks and other general clutter now encroaching on the original formation.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #34 on: January 17, 2012, 21:59:30 »

I have a feeling there's an influential local MP (Member of Parliament) somewhere in the Witney area... Wink
Logged
macbrains
Full Member
***
Posts: 43


View Profile
« Reply #35 on: January 27, 2012, 13:24:19 »

Yes, that would be a half-way house scheme they could consider.  After all, the panel box would no longer be in the way once its area of control transfers to Didcot.

From the Oxford Mail:
Quote
And it commits the council to investigate reinstatement of the rail link between Oxford, Witney and Carterton, to improve connections with the west Oxfordshire towns and RAF (Royal Air Force) Brize Norton.

They could save a little money by not bothering to progress that idea though.  13 miles of new track to serve two places with a combined population of only just over 30000?  Not a chance of it ever being financially viable with (the usual problem) of housing and business parks and other general clutter now encroaching on the original formation.

Have you tried commuting to Oxford from Carterton or Witney via the A40 recently? Shocked  Doesn't matter what time you start, inevitably you end up in a huge traffic queue...

I do understand your point about viability, but that also applies to lots of other infrastructure projects that get approved as well.  As for new building across the original line, that applies in a few places certainly, but with some ingenuity could be solved.

rgds
m
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10119


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: January 27, 2012, 13:50:22 »

No, but I'm well aware that it's a horrible commute, though both places are very well served with an excellent bus service.  Journey time might be unreliable, but what lovely buses are used on that route!  My point about viability remains though - I'd be surprised if that route could be reinstated without spending upwards of half a billion pounds.  That simply isn't realistic, with ingenuity or not!

Better, if not ideal, options would include major improvements to the B4044 - getting rid of that silly tollbridge would be a start - to give a proper second route into the city.  Massive, and long overdue, improvements to parking at Hanborough station would also be a start as I'm sure many more people would commute by train should there be a guaranteed parking space and a regular enough service - I'm not sure how clogged up the A4095 gets which runs straight from Witney to Hanborough of a morning?
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
macbrains
Full Member
***
Posts: 43


View Profile
« Reply #37 on: January 27, 2012, 15:26:34 »

No doubt I'm just nostalgic but I'd love to see trains in Witney once more!

Agree about the splendid bus service, with leather seats...but it isn't cheap.  Regarding Hanborough, as you say, the car park is the key unless the bus service from Witney can be improved - this has been discussed before on these forums.  But the A4095 gets clogged up in tandem with the A40 with commuters looking for any escape they can find from the jams, and thereby causing more.

rgds
m
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17895


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #38 on: February 21, 2012, 23:03:44 »

From the British Transport Police press release:

Quote
British Transport Police (BTP (British Transport Police)) is appealing for information after seven cars were vandalised at Didcot Parkway rail station.

The incident occurred sometime between 3pm on Tuesday, 14 February and 8.30am on Wednesday, 15 February when a member of the public noticed the cars had been vandalised and contacted police.

Sergeant Adrian Naylor, officer in charge of BTP's dedicated team at Oxford, said: ^All seven cars had been left in the car park and when their owners returned to them they discovered windows had been smashed or damaged, some doors had been forced open and in at least one case the cars had had valuables removed from them.^

The cars were all in Foxhall car park, and officers believe the people responsible may have used ballast to damage the vehicles.

Sgt Naylor added: ^We^ve followed a number of leads so far, including viewing CCTV (Closed Circuit Tele Vision) which appears to show someone entering the vicinity on a bicycle around 10.30pm, but our enquiries have so far proved fruitless.

^We are still in the process of speaking with the owners of the cars involved and I am now appealing to anyone who may have been in the area that night and noticed any suspicious activity to contact police ^ your information could be vital to the investigation.^

Anyone with information is asked to contact British Transport Police on 0800 40 50 40 quoting reference B11/LNA of 20/02/2012. Or call the independent charity Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111.
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17895


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #39 on: February 23, 2012, 19:53:24 »

From the British Transport Police press release:

Quote
CCTV released: Police appeal after cycles stolen from Didcot Parkway station

British Transport Police (BTP (British Transport Police)) is appealing for information after two cycles were stolen from Didcot Parkway station.

Officers are also releasing CCTV images of a group of men they would like to identify in connection with the incidents which took place on Tuesday, 17 January 2012.

PC Bob Burrowes, the officer investigating both incidents, said: ^The bikes were securely locked to the cycle rack at Didcot Parkway rail station by two local passengers early in the morning. When they returned to the station in the afternoon, they discovered the locks had been cut and their bikes had been stolen.^

Police have so far followed a number of leads including circulating the CCTV images on police intelligence sources, but to no avail so far.

PC Burrowes added: ^I am now appealing for the public^s help to identify these men. If you were at Didcot Parkway station or in the vicinity on the day and saw anything suspicious, I would urge you to get in touch.

^Unfortunately cycles are a popular target for thieves but there are several steps people can take to ensure their bikes are adequately marked and secured to help reduce the risk of becoming a victim of bike theft. The best thing to remember is to register your bike and also to ensure a solid lock is used to secure it. If a bike is adequately marked, it makes it much easier to identify and therefore reduces its desirability to thieves.^

BTP officers regularly conduct cycle crime awareness surgeries at stations to offer crime prevention advice and identify the top locations for bike theft each fortnight, targeting them through covert and overt policing operations to try and catch would-be offenders in the act.

Anyone who can name the men in the CCTV images should contact British Transport Police on 0800 40 50 40 quoting reference B9/LNA of 21/02/2012. Alternatively, contact the independent charity Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111.



Edit note: Images now removed due to expiry of copyright permission. CfN
« Last Edit: November 28, 2013, 14:09:07 by Chris from Nailsea » Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17895


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #40 on: April 18, 2012, 21:20:51 »

From the Oxford Mail:

Quote
Forecourt work is back on track



A ^6.7m project to revamp the forecourt at Didcot Parkway railway station is back on track after a year of delays.

Improvement work, first outlined in 2001, was originally due to start in March last year, but was postponed following safety assessments carried out by landowners Network Rail. In October 2011 another start date was postponed.

Demolition work finally started last week at the site off Station Road and the project is due to be completed late next year, in advance of the ^125m extension of the Orchard Shopping Centre.

The transport hub is being reorganised to make it easier and safer for cars, buses, cyclists, taxis and pedestrians to use. Disused buildings in the west car park are being demolished to create a temporary car park, paving the way for construction work to begin in the autumn.

Town council leader Margaret Davies said: ^This is excellent news and when people saw the work starting last week it caused quite a buzz. Hopefully the work will be finished before phase two of the shopping centre is completed. The scheme will also mean an end to the flooding of the station subway as work is being carried out to pump the water away under Cow Lane bridge.^

Oxfordshire County Council is providing the bulk of the funding.

Didcot county councillor Bill Service said: ^This is a significant investment and once it is completed it will be a major improvement. A lot of people living on the Ladygrove estate commute and every day you see the march from Cow Lane bridge to the station.^

The new temporary car park should be ready in the summer and will be in use for 18 months. During the first phase of work, there will be temporary traffic lights in Station Road from 9.30am to 4pm.

First Great Western spokesman John Ratchford said: ^We^re delighted the work is under way, and pleased we can work in partnership with Oxfordshire County Council and South Oxfordshire District Council.^

Didcot Chamber of Commerce president Julia Williams said: ^This is excellent news for the local economy. The forecourt needed tidying up to make it less confusing in terms of where pedestrians and other users are directed, and this is a good opportunity to create new signs showing the way to the town centre.^

TIMELINE...

2001: Plans for a new transport hub put forward in feasibility study.

2009: Oxfordshire County Council announces ^5.4m plan to revamp forecourt.

2010: Contract for ^5.7m scheme goes out to tender.

2011: ^5.7m scheme scheduled to start in February gets delayed six months and then postponed again.

2012: Work starts on ^6.7m scheme, due to finish at end of 2013.

Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Temple Meads
Full Member
***
Posts: 34


HST's are the future..


View Profile WWW
« Reply #41 on: April 18, 2012, 22:36:24 »

I can't see how they can install a gateline at Didcot, unless they give an NR» (Network Rail - home page) ticket to everyone who wants access to the railway centre, as it'd be a lot of manual swipes for the gateline assitant otherwise  Grin

It's that or building a super-duper new entrance for the centre I feel.
Logged

Passenger and  Enthusiast
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17895


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #42 on: August 31, 2012, 13:09:59 »

From the FGW (First Great Western) press release:

Quote
A new station manager and a new future for Didcot Parkway

First Great Western is delighted to announce ^2 million improvements works to Didcot Parkway Station have now started.

This includes upgrading the ticket office and station concourse and the installation of ticket gates. In addition to the ^2 million improvements to the booking hall, Oxfordshire County Council will be creating a new modern forecourt, which will be safer and easier to use.

The improvements will mean a smarter, more welcoming environment in keeping with Didcot^s status as a key station on the Great Western main line.

Dave Martin, the new Station Manager at Didcot Parkway, said: ^Let me first say hello, and how delighted I am to be taking over as Station Manager.

^At First Great Western we recognise our role in the communities we serve. These improvement works will ensure that Didcot Parkway continues to provide the services and environment our customers require.

^Every effort will be made to reduce inconvenience caused by the work, but if you have any queries or comments please speak to me or a member of our staff.^

The improvements works began on Friday 31 August, with the ticket office upgrade due to be completed in 12 weeks. Work on the forecourt will start in September with the closure of the lower level East car park.

A temporary ticket office has been set up while we make the improvements. There will be no change to opening hours, and the office will be fully staffed. Ticket Vending Machines will also be moved but will remain available for use.

Customers wishing to seek more information can do so either by speaking with a member of staff or by telephoning 08457 000 125.
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1424


View Profile
« Reply #43 on: September 05, 2012, 13:19:44 »

They have been cracking on with the work - there was nothing visible last Friday, then when I came back on Saturday most of the booking hall was boarded off and work had started demolishing the old ticket office.

One of the ticket machines is currently inaccessible behind the works. The machine outside has never reliably dispensed tickets bought over the internet so there is only one machine left which is therefore rather popular (and was out of order when I came back on Saturday). There weren't any additional machines in the temporary office in the car park on Friday, but there may be by now.
« Last Edit: September 05, 2012, 17:17:31 by didcotdean » Logged
Andrew1939 from West Oxon
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 535


View Profile Email
« Reply #44 on: September 05, 2012, 16:55:01 »

At long last! Why does it take so long to get investment projects off the starting blocks?

A friend of mine has a son who lives in Brisbane (Aus) but who came back home to work for 18 months. He said that when he left Brisbane there was a proposal to extend the suburban rail network nearer to his home. When he returned after 18 months it had been built aznd was in operation.

Then look at Chilterns modest proposal to upgrade the Oxford/Bicester line and construct a chord to link it to their main line to Marylebone. Proposed years ago but the enquiries and red tape seem to get longer and longer. Its no wonder that rail projects cost so much with many GRIP (Guide to Railway Investment Projects) studies in ever increasing detail taking years to prepare and needed before you can even seek finance for a project.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page