Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 11:15 29 Apr 2024
* Power cut causes disruption at Stansted Airport
- End of the road for 'Banksie' pothole campaigner
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Apr (1963)
Bristol Bus Boycott announced (*)

Train RunningCancelled
11:12 Reading to Newbury
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Short Run
09:23 Swansea to London Paddington
11:20 Paignton to Exmouth
11:54 Newbury to London Paddington
12:11 Newbury to Reading
14:02 Oxford to London Paddington
Delayed
09:57 Exmouth to Paignton
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 29, 2024, 11:31:49 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[174] Clan Line - by Clan Line !
[65] Visiting the pub on the way home.
[54] Labour to nationalise railways within five years of coming to ...
[50] Cornish delays
[13] South Western Railways Waterloo - Bristol services axed
[13] access for all at Devon stations report
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Rolling stock maintainaince standards  (Read 2944 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40845



View Profile WWW Email
« on: January 19, 2008, 07:48:36 »

This subject has come up "hidden" within a strong thread on More Train Less Strain, and it merits its own topic.  Here's a crosspost to start it off:

Mada.. you state in a post further up i quote.... poorly maintained rolling stock... can prove this with evidence? because i know a lot of lads and lasses who work bloody hard at times when nearly eveyone is asleep to keep what stock we do have going and to get you to work.
Do you actually think the trains get themselves fuelled,serviced for the days work ahead, and dont mention the clean word,  if you see the bloody mess left by Passengers day in day  it drives you to despair.
Prehaps you should get yourself to a depot open day if they run any again ever and see what actually goes on before quoting poorly maintained rolling stock because that quote to me means you think people are not doing there jobs properly.
Trains do an a lot of mileage a day, probably more than you do in your car in a week and old kit does break down so dont blame the maintainence staff they are really doing there best to give you a train to get to work on
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40845



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2008, 11:43:46 »

Rolling stock is built with a life expectancy, and it shows something called the bathtub effect with regard to reliability through its life. They start off unreliable, have a midlife where they run pretty darned well, then all the aches and pains of old age cause a progressively less reliable time before they are retired.

The Adalante units are, it could be argued, just coming off the end of their teething troubles .... and perhaps will be much more reliable for Hull trains and anyone else who runs them.  Most of the rest are likely geting more and more difficult to keep running reliably. And with delays on completing all the facilities at the depot and staff having to work around that, it can scarceley make the job easier ....

So even if we see a dramatic fall off in train reliability (and I understand / have seen figures to show that the reverse is happening) that's very unlikely to be down to the staff.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40845



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2008, 06:52:00 »

I knew I had a picture somewhere ...

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Conner
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1041


08436 at Corfe Castle on the Swanage Railway


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2008, 09:25:59 »

So where is are rolling stick in the picture?
The Adelantes are obviously still on the downards curve.
The HST (High Speed Train)'s must have been pushed back into the middle with new engines.
The Turbo's don't seem to break down that often, I think they're in the middle.
I am not to sure about the West Fleet though. I think they were starting to go back up because FGW (First Great Western) said they're making technical modifications to improve reliabilty.
Anybody else any other ideas?
Logged
gaf71
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 305


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2008, 09:41:31 »

So where is are rolling stick in the picture?
The Adelantes are obviously still on the downards curve.
The HST (High Speed Train)'s must have been pushed back into the middle with new engines.
The Turbo's don't seem to break down that often, I think they're in the middle.
I am not to sure about the West Fleet though. I think they were starting to go back up because FGW (First Great Western) said they're making technical modifications to improve reliabilty.
Anybody else any other ideas?
A lot of the problems with the 142's at Exeter are door faults, which often can't be replicated when on the depot. We are forever booking door( and heating) faults on these units, and they just come back NFF( no fault found). This is very frustrating for train crew, when you know you have had a problem with the unit, but i suspect it's a lot more frustrating for the maintenence staff.
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: January 20, 2008, 10:33:24 »

Worse at Starcross/Eggesford as its such a high angle aswell.
Logged
gaf71
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 305


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: January 20, 2008, 18:02:20 »

Worse at Starcross/Eggesford as its such a high angle aswell.
yes. Starcross on the upside is the worst place, because of the curvature and camber.
Logged
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: January 20, 2008, 18:26:42 »

I've seen a slight improvement on the 142's though with regards to door faults?? maybe it's the fact that they are being used more they have loosened up so to speak after their months in store.
Logged
smithy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 471


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: January 20, 2008, 18:38:37 »

the maintenance is crap simple as that!
when on spm overnight the servicing is done outside,but if they come in with a fault chances of getting in shed are slim,plus fgw are short on sets they simply cannot stop them so the same old rubbish is sent out day after day.
Logged
gaf71
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 305


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: January 20, 2008, 22:09:28 »

I've seen a slight improvement on the 142's though with regards to door faults?? maybe it's the fact that they are being used more they have loosened up so to speak after their months in store.
I agree, they are slightly better than when they arrived. It' s Grahame's 'bathtub principle' in action. Smiley
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page