Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 21:55 28 Apr 2024
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Apr (1996)
GNER franchise (Sea Containers) starts on ECML (*)

Train RunningCancelled
21:16 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Short Run
18:44 London Paddington to Hereford
Delayed
18:53 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:24 Swansea to London Paddington
19:38 London Paddington to Swansea
19:53 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:30 Cardiff Central to Warminster
20:44 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
21:30 Swindon to Cheltenham Spa
21:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 28, 2024, 22:03:13 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[156] Clan Line - by Clan Line !
[134] Visiting the pub on the way home.
[49] South Western Railways Waterloo - Bristol services axed
[47] access for all at Devon stations report
[30] Labour to nationalise railways within five years of coming to ...
[25] Misleading advertising?
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
  Print  
Author Topic: Network Rail's electrification upgrade delayed, now restarted, by government  (Read 34921 times)
Thatcham Crossing
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 793


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: June 25, 2015, 21:06:13 »

For me it was only a matter of time before they had to announce that it's not going well.

As far as I can work out (from info released today) we will still get the wires to Newbury?

I guess Bedwyn is completely out of the question now.

Logged
Rapidash
Full Member
***
Posts: 91


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: June 25, 2015, 21:12:58 »

Fat chance of anything further West than Bristol ever getting sparky then. No doubt  this will stuff up  the cascade plans and the Devon Metro will be lumbered with bloomin' D trains.....
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6299


View Profile
« Reply #32 on: June 25, 2015, 21:19:43 »

What was included in the original estimate.  Part of the justification was that the signalling needed replacing anyway and so did the trains so it was not a lot extra. 

Are we comparing the same numbers. 
Good point. This was what was mentioned on BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) Points West this evening that the estimated cost is now ^7.5bn 7 times more than the estimate in 2009. That is a very general headline figure that makes a good news story without giving detail of what that money is actually buying now compared to when it was announced that the estimated cost would be ^1bn back in 2009.
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6299


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: June 25, 2015, 21:23:47 »

Fat chance of anything further West than Bristol ever getting sparky then. No doubt  this will stuff up  the cascade plans and the Devon Metro will be lumbered with bloomin' D trains.....
Yup, I have a feeling that the company behind the D train conversation project is about to receive a lot of orders that most of if not all D stock will be required.

If they come up with a quality product for the right price then why not? Better than overcrowded trains.
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: June 25, 2015, 21:25:40 »

How was BR (British Rail(ways)) able to electrify virtually the entire East Coast mainline in the 1980's with little fuss and yet despite all our 21st century technology Network Rail are struggling with just a few miles?

I know one answer is staff with the skills are no longer working on the railways.

Paul Clifton mentioned in his report on BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) South Today earlier that they are even recruiting from Indian railways.

Wasn't the ECML (East Coast Main Line) electrification done on the cheap, manifesting itself in the wiring falling apart every time it gets a bit windy?
I seem to recall reading somewhere that the reason the ECML wires fall down more often than the WCML (West Coast Main Line) is that the southern section of the ECML project was only intended for the suburban services and hence wasn't really up to the job once the wires were extended and 125mph INTERCITY services started using them. Not sure if that's true though.

I doubt it. Everything north of Hitchin was done as part of the Edinburgh scheme, and it seems to be the 4 track headsman section between there and Huntingdon which often comes to pieces. And yes it was done on the cheap - ^300m in 1984 prices which is probably around ^1.2Bn today.  
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6299


View Profile
« Reply #35 on: June 25, 2015, 21:29:12 »

In all that was announced today one thing is certain HST (High Speed Train) lives on on the GW (Great Western) mainline! If it wasn't already planned, could we see HSTs in the new GW green livery?

It could be a long time before Scotrail see GW HSTs running north of the border. I guess that the IEPs (Intercity Express Program / Project.) being built now for the GW will go to the East Coast first of all as they can handle them being an electrified railway.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4453


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: June 25, 2015, 21:42:17 »

In all that was announced today one thing is certain HST (High Speed Train) lives on on the GW (Great Western) mainline! If it wasn't already planned, could we see HSTs in the new GW green livery?

It could be a long time before Scotrail see GW HSTs running north of the border. I guess that the IEPs (Intercity Express Program / Project.) being built now for the GW will go to the East Coast first of all as they can handle them being an electrified railway.
I don't think that is certain yet.  There does not yet seem to be a race to cut costs at any price and they know they will have to replace the HST's some time soon or do a very major rebuild that is of questionable value. 

I think the certain thing is that things will happen slower. Maybe that is right if, as it seems, we just don't have the skills any more. We need time to relearn the skills on one project before we carry on with others. 
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5318


View Profile
« Reply #37 on: June 25, 2015, 21:45:45 »

Haven't the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) got previous form for this, including e.g. Reading re-modelling and station rebuild in the 'electrification costs' in one report a couple of years back?

The latest headline figure is probably GR total route modernisation + rolling stock + Crossrail on network + WRaTH, and even Dawlish avoiding line (highest cost option) and Tavistock.  Oh and then Bristol Metro, Devon Metro, - is there anything else we could round up and include?

Paul
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40843



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #38 on: June 25, 2015, 21:46:10 »

In all that was announced today one thing is certain HST (High Speed Train) lives on on the GW (Great Western) mainline! If it wasn't already planned, could we see HSTs in the new GW green livery?

Attachment from FGW (First Great Western) press ...
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1425


View Profile
« Reply #39 on: June 25, 2015, 22:37:46 »

Reports tonight that the cost of the GWML (Great Western Main Line) electrification has gone from ^1bn in 2009 to ^7bn now. That's insane!  Shocked
The figure quoted on BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) Oxford was ^1.7bn which seems a bit more plausible, although still no clarity on exactly what this contains.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18924



View Profile
« Reply #40 on: June 25, 2015, 23:43:39 »

Fat chance of anything further West than Bristol ever getting sparky then.

Err... last time I looked at a map, Cardiff was west of Bristol.  Roll Eyes
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17895


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #41 on: June 26, 2015, 00:45:30 »

And so is Swansea.  Wink

From the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page):

Quote
Cameron quizzed on London-Swansea rail upgrade timescale

David Cameron has been challenged to say whether a project to electrify rail lines between London and Swansea will be completed by 2018.

A newspaper report has suggested the UK (United Kingdom) government plans to "scale back and axe rail electrification projects".

During Prime Minister's Questions, Mr Cameron told Plaid Cymru MP (Member of Parliament) Jonathan Edwards that ministers were committed to the London-Swansea scheme. But he said Network Rail needed to get its costs "under control".

Mr Edwards asked: "Can you inform the house and the people of Wales whether it continues to be the policy of your government to complete [the upgrade] to Swansea by 2018 and part-fund the Valley lines?"

Mr Cameron replied: "We're absolutely committed to electrifying the Great Western Main Line to Cardiff, through to Swansea. We're also contributing ^125m to the cost of the wider Valley lines electrification. It's vital that this work goes ahead. We do need to make sure that Network Rail gets its costs under control and has strong leadership in place and we'll make sure those things happen."
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12366


View Profile Email
« Reply #42 on: June 26, 2015, 05:19:30 »

That was Wednesday, this announcement was Thursday. Suspect pne supercedes the other? I suspect Seansea will get done but as with the other projects, it'll meet a delay
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17895


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #43 on: June 26, 2015, 05:29:21 »

From BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) Wales politics on Thursday:

Quote
Great Western rail electrification 'a top priority'

Electrifying the Great Western line is "a top priority", the transport secretary has said, as he announces a rethink of a ^38bn programme to overhaul Britain's railways.

Patrick McLoughlin said Network Rail's five-year plan was being "reset" as it was "costing more and taking longer". Schemes in the Midlands and Yorkshire would be put on hold, he told MPs (Member of Parliament).

Sir Peter Hendy will become the new chairman of Network Rail in place of Gwynedd-born Richard Parry-Jones.

Mr McLoughin told MPs on Thursday that the planned programme of rail upgrades was being reviewed to "get it back on track".

"Electrification of the Great Western line is a top priority and I want Network Rail to concentrate its efforts on getting that right," he said.

Responding for the Welsh government, Economy Minister Edwina Hart said: "It's got to be kept on budget, it's got to be kept on time because ourselves and industry are desperate to ensure we have the electrification to Swansea. I'm hopeful that this is an absolute commitment with the government, but we will certainly be taking them to task if they deviate."

Wales Office Minister Alun Cairns said he was "pleased to hear the strong commitment to south Wales electrification through to Swansea from the transport secretary today". "This project will transform the lives of people in south Wales by attracting investors, linking businesses to suppliers and connecting people to jobs."

David Cameron had said during Prime Minister's Questions on Tuesday that ministers were "absolutely committed" to the London-Swansea upgrade following a newspaper report that some projects would be shelved.
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40843



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #44 on: June 26, 2015, 06:45:25 »

It really wouldn't make sense (to me) for them to stop short of Oxford, (or Bristol or Cardiff!) and I would suspect that a Swansea phase is fairly safe; don't know enough about outside GW (Great Western) area to comment on those.  With Oxford and its big passenger flows, it would  seem crazy to turn electric trains back at Didcot which - although growing and planned to do so - ain't no Reading-sized hub.  Of course, you could make Swindon the end of the suburban run, with a Didcot - Oxford shuttle, but somehow I doubt that Wink.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page