Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 23:15 26 Apr 2024
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
26th Apr (2016)
DOO strikes start on Southern (link)

Train RunningCancelled
27/04/24 12:01 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
27/04/24 13:51 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
Short Run
27/04/24 06:34 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Shrub Hill
27/04/24 06:34 Great Malvern to Bristol Temple Meads
27/04/24 06:55 Cheltenham Spa to Weymouth
27/04/24 10:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
27/04/24 11:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
27/04/24 12:49 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
27/04/24 14:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
27/04/24 15:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
Delayed
17:50 Penzance to London Paddington
22:40 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
22:46 Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 26, 2024, 23:19:47 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[141] Labour to nationalise railways within five years of coming to ...
[73] access for all at Devon stations report
[47] Who we are - the people behind firstgreatwestern.info
[17] Bonaparte's at Bristol Temple Meads
[3] Lack of rolling stock due to attacks on shipping in the Red Se...
[2] Cornish delays
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 11
  Print  
Author Topic: Worcester Parkway project  (Read 90267 times)
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #105 on: July 10, 2014, 17:18:32 »

This pointless station will either become a white elephant, or will extract users from existing stations to the extent they are closed.

(a) It's miles away from most of the population of Worcester, and people will have to hack along the clogged up Southern bypass to access the station. Are there that many conveniently placed villages that will use it? It's not like it has the location/road links of Warwick Parkway!

(b) It adds YET ANOTER Angry stop for Hereford and Malvern commuters, already tortured to extinction by stops at Hanborough etc.

(c) The Cotswold line does not offer a frequent enough service to act as a good connecting service, so there will be little new traffic on the Cotswold line. And foolish commuters who do change here will be left stranded in the middle of nowhere, probably with just a bus shelter for company...

(d) CrossCountry will not want to slow down the already pitifully slow service from the South West into Birmingham. No doubt the stops will be slapped on the Cardiff to Nottinghams, causing outrage due to extended journey times (and capacity once the train reaches Bromsgrove.)

(e) If will be urban sprawl in open countryside and - no doubt - acres of fields will be bulldozed by greedy developers for new homes.

A better solution, just needing some extra stock:

*Extend a Snow Hill line service to Gloucester every hour (calling at Tewksbury)
*Add a second hourly New Street to Worcester service (with calls at Bromsgrove/ Barnt Green) and extend to Pershore and Evesham (redoubling required).
*Improve car parking at Shrub Hill to encourage use of the Bham service.

This provides better links across Worcestershire - including the much desired link to Cheltenham for XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) connections south.
It also stops the extraction of passengers at Shrub Hill that will occur, and the crush loading of XC services into Birmingham.
Logged
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1209


View Profile Email
« Reply #106 on: July 10, 2014, 17:54:02 »

(a) It's miles away from most of the population of Worcester, and people will have to hack along the clogged up Southern bypass to access the station. Are there that many conveniently placed villages that will use it? It's not like it has the location/road links of Warwick Parkway!

Indeed, Warwick Parkway is a trifling three miles from the M40, whereas this new station will be an unthinkable, er, 1.5 miles from the M5.

Quote
(b) It adds YET ANOTER Angry stop for Hereford and Malvern commuters, already tortured to extinction by stops at Hanborough etc.

Though if they're extinct, they won't really mind, given that they don't exist any more.

(Personally I doubt I'll use it much, but only because the fares will presumably be set by CrossCountry and therefore on the high side - if I wanted to go north and was willing to pay CrossCountry fares, I'd travel via Oxford. I'm not, so I go via Worcester.)
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #107 on: July 10, 2014, 19:56:31 »

Indeed, Warwick Parkway is a trifling three miles from the M40, whereas this new station will be an unthinkable, er, 1.5 miles from the M5.

Though if they're extinct, they won't really mind, given that they don't exist any more.

(a) Warwick Parkway's main pull is the A46 which gets commuters from Coventry, Kennilworth, Stratford, Evesham etc. The M40 also attracts Redditch, Bromsgrove and Kidderminster people.

(b) Well, an extra stop is hardly going to attract them back!
Logged
Network SouthEast
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 492



View Profile
« Reply #108 on: July 10, 2014, 20:51:55 »

Could someone tell me what the passenger figures for Pershore and Honeybourne are?
2012-2013 financial year data from the ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about)

Honeybourne had 47,788 entries and exits
Pershore had 89,546 entries and exits
Logged
stebbo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 445


View Profile
« Reply #109 on: July 10, 2014, 21:13:03 »

Interesting, so Pershore has more users than Hanborough. I'm genuinely surprised at this - although my journeys on the line for the last 3 years or so have been from Kingham to London so I've no personal experience of what's going on at the western end of the line these days.
Logged
CLPGMS
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 155


View Profile
« Reply #110 on: July 10, 2014, 22:57:57 »

Quote
Interesting, so Pershore has more users than Hanborough. I'm genuinely surprised at this

I think that you mean Honeybourne. Hanborough had 172684 in 2012/3 and has now overtaken Kingham (169496). 
Logged
stebbo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 445


View Profile
« Reply #111 on: July 12, 2014, 09:58:50 »

Apologies, my mistake.

Interesting photo on the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) website where there is a reference to Worcester Parkway getting the go-ahead with a picture of a station and third rail electrification.................. Apparently the local MP (Member of Parliament) is ecstatic about journeys from Worcester to London in under 2 hours.

Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #112 on: July 12, 2014, 15:02:16 »

This pointless station will either become a white elephant, or will extract users from existing stations to the extent they are closed.

So your argument is that either it won't have any users or it will have so many that surrounding stations will close?  I don't quite see how you can argue for both those scenarios.

Noting later you suggest that stopping the Cardiff - Nottingham services there will result in capacity problems, I think you effectively discount the white elephant option yourself.

Are you seriously suggesting that any of the surrounding stations would close. Which ones do you have in mind?

Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #113 on: July 13, 2014, 19:27:20 »

Shrub Hill - confirmed by Worcester Councillors in the past - will most likely close. The main purpose of Shrub Hill is for Park and Ride passengers to Brum and Worcester. I can't find a source but it's been reported in the papers before.

Malvern Link could also close: people in the Powick region will drive to Parkway for a faster service to Brum. This is my opinion.
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17893


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #114 on: July 13, 2014, 20:07:15 »

Your posts on this forum are always interesting, Btline, and I do read all of them.  Wink

However, and at the risk of labouring the point: you aren't actually able to provide any credible evidence to support either of your most recent assertions?  Lips sealed
« Last Edit: July 13, 2014, 20:17:04 by Chris from Nailsea » Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
martvw
Full Member
***
Posts: 55


View Profile Email
« Reply #115 on: July 13, 2014, 22:53:45 »

 Great news a Worcester Parkway Station at last "what a good idea". As for Shrub Hill Station if it were to close which I would doubt ! Who would pay for the maintenance on the buildings that I think are listed, but with no trains calling!! The Park Way Station at Norton is just what the Worcester railway layout needs to bring it in to this century (a good kick up the rear). Both Worcester City Stations need to be updated to act as feeder Stations to the new Parkway Station. Perhaps London Midland trains could start calling at the Parkway Station, running to Evesham and back as has been suggested, and as passengers start to use Worcester Parkway Station this will help reduce the pressure at Birmingham New Street station a little for passengers traveling further north and south.  I don't think Malvern Link Station would close ! the passenger numbers are on the up and its just had a rebuild (very smart).
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12365


View Profile Email
« Reply #116 on: July 14, 2014, 09:05:32 »

Unless something drastic is also done to Shrub Hill infrastructure, pushing more trains through there (your suggestion of LM (London Midland - recent franchise) trains to Evesham) would be a disaster in terms of operational performance...which comes first....?
Logged
stebbo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 445


View Profile
« Reply #117 on: July 14, 2014, 10:14:43 »

Hasn't Malvern Link just had a facelift and a load of money spent on it?
Logged
martvw
Full Member
***
Posts: 55


View Profile Email
« Reply #118 on: July 14, 2014, 10:49:59 »

I see many London Midland services come in to Worcester Shrub Hill from Birmingham and go out of service (they park on the centre track or behind platform no2) . Some of these could run out to Evesham and back in the gaps in between the FGW (First Great Western) services calling at the parkway station. The infrastructure does need sorting out perhaps at the same time as the signalling ! This is on the cards to be done. Yes Malvern Link station has a new ticket office and waiting rooms.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12365


View Profile Email
« Reply #119 on: July 14, 2014, 11:00:32 »

I see many London Midland services come in to Worcester Shrub Hill from Birmingham and go out of service (they park on the centre track or behind platform no2)

And when do you suggest the drivers take their breaks? Yup, after they've parked up. Going out to Evesham would require further stock, extra driver hours....additional costs. I doubt it would be cost effective for LM (London Midland - recent franchise).

Quote
The infrastructure does need sorting out perhaps at the same time as the signalling ! This is on the cards to be done.

Errr, not quite. Been put back into Control Period 6 and likely to be CP7 before it gets high enough up the list to be done.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 11
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page