Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 19:15 28 Apr 2024
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Apr (1996)
GNER franchise (Sea Containers) starts on ECML (*)

Train RunningCancelled
18:38 London Paddington to Swansea
19:21 Reading to Gatwick Airport
21:16 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Short Run
18:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
18:44 London Paddington to Hereford
19:35 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
Delayed
13:53 London Paddington to Penzance
15:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
17:53 Weymouth to Bristol Temple Meads
19:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 28, 2024, 19:23:09 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[256] Clan Line - by Clan Line !
[50] Labour to nationalise railways within five years of coming to ...
[41] Misleading advertising?
[14] access for all at Devon stations report
[14] Who we are - the people behind firstgreatwestern.info
[5] Cornish delays
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: National Infrastructure Commission's interim report into the East-West Corridor  (Read 7904 times)
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12366


View Profile Email
« on: November 17, 2016, 11:45:02 »

Published today - here

Quote
The Commission’s central finding is that a lack of sufficient and suitable housing presents a fundamental risk to the success of this area. Without a joined-up plan for housing, jobs and infrastructure across the corridor, it will be left behind its international competitors. By providing the foundations for such a strategy, new east-west transport links present a once in a generation opportunity to secure the area’s future success.

Quote
In March 2016, the National Infrastructure Commission was asked to consider how to maximise the potential of the Cambridge- Milton Keynes- Oxford corridor as a single, knowledge-intensive cluster that competes on a global stage, protecting the area’s high quality environment, and securing the homes and jobs that the area needs.

The Commission’s central finding is that a lack of sufficient and suitable housing presents a fundamental risk to the success of this area. Without a joined-up plan for housing, jobs and infrastructure across the corridor, it will be left behind its international competitors. By providing the foundations for such a strategy, new east-west transport links present a once in a generation opportunity to secure the area’s future success.

This interim report makes practical recommendations to that end:
•Government should go ahead with East West Rail’s initial phase, a new link cutting journey times by more than half on the route from Oxford to Bedford and Milton Keynes, ensuring it is delivered before 2024; and it should invest in developing as soon as possible detailed plans for both the next phase of East West Rail (which would complete the link to Cambridge) and for a new Oxford-Cambridge Expressway.

•Plans for these major new transport links should be drawn up with the specific intention of securing the tens of thousands of new homes this area needs.

•Local authorities, Local Enterprise Partnerships, key government departments and national delivery agencies, should work together to develop a strategic vision for housing, jobs and infrastructure across the corridor, as well as proposals for the joint governance arrangements required to deliver co-ordinated planning. This should include the consideration of ambitious new delivery mechanisms, such as development corporations focused on new transport hubs and interchanges. The quality of infrastructure and its impact on maintaining and enhancing the built environment of the corridor should be central to any strategic plan for the area.

In the second phase of this study, the National Infrastructure Commission will work with local and national government, and other stakeholders, to put this strategy in place.

Releasing the report, NIC Deputy Chair, Sir John Armitt said:

To succeed in the global economy, the UK (United Kingdom) must build on its strengths. The corridor connecting Cambridge, Milton Keynes and Oxford could be Britain’s Silicon Valley – a globally recognised centre for science, technology and innovation. But its future success is not guaranteed.

Transport links across the corridor are often slow, unreliable and congested, and the area is home to two of the least affordable cities in the UK, in part because it has consistently failed to build the homes it needs. These twin failings are already increasing costs for businesses and diminishing their ability to attract employees at all levels – including the recruitment and retention of globally mobile talent.

This area can become greater than the sum of its parts with better strategic planning which radically improves its transport connectivity whilst securing the tens of thousands of new homes it so desperately needs. East West Rail and the Oxford-Cambridge Expressway, can be a catalyst to bring the region together to deliver the housing and connectivity it will need to compete with the best in the world.

This is a once in a generation opportunity – we must grab it with both hands.

NIC Interim Report: In Brief

To succeed in the global economy, Britain must build on its strengths. The corridor connecting Cambridge, Milton Keynes and Oxford could be the UK’s Silicon Valley – a world renowned centre for science, technology and innovation. But its future success is not guaranteed.

The Commission’s central finding is that a lack of sufficient and suitable housing presents a fundamental risk to the success of the area. Without a joined-up plan for housing, jobs and infrastructure across the corridor, it will be left behind by its international competitors. By providing the foundations for such a strategy, new east-west transport links present a once-in-a-generation opportunity to secure the area’s future success.

A LACK OF HOUSING AND CONNECTIVITY ARE PUTTING FUTURE SUCCESS AT RISK

The Cambridge-Milton Keynes-Oxford corridor faces a chronic undersupply of homes made worse by poor east-west transport connectivity. Two of the least affordable cities in the UK lie within the corridor, and the area as a whole has consistently failed to build the number of homes it needs.

That shortage puts sustained growth at risk. It is already increasing costs for businesses and diminishing their ability to attract employees at all levels – including the recruitment and retention of globally mobile talent.

A JOINED-UP STRATEGY LINKING INFRASTRUCTURE AND HOMES

Investment in infrastructure, including enhanced east-west transport links, can help to address these challenges, but it must be properly aligned with a strategy for new homes and communities, not developed in isolation. This means local authorities working in partnership, and with national government, to plan places, homes and transport together. Current governance mechanisms are not sufficient to deliver the step-change in strategic leadership and collaboration needed.

A ONCE–IN-A-GENERATION OPPORTUNITY

Planning for East West Rail and the Oxford-Cambridge Expressway should be taken forward urgently. These are once-in-a-generation investments that will deliver substantial national benefits and, if designed properly, can provide the foundations for the corridor’s long-term prosperity: unlocking housing sites, improving land supply, and supporting well-connected and sensitively designed new communities, whilst bringing productive towns and cities closer together.

This corridor is a national asset, that competes on the world stage and can fire the British economy – but only with an integrated and ambitious strategy to deliver new homes, connectivity and opportunities can it realise its full potential.

In the second phase of this study, the National Infrastructure Commission will work with local and national government, and other stakeholders, to put this strategy in place.

Recommendations in full

Recommendation 1: Local authorities, Local Enterprise Partnerships, government departments and national delivery agencies, should work together to develop an integrated strategic plan for infrastructure, housing and jobs across the corridor.
•The plan should provide a framework for cross-corridor economic and transport strategies and for strategic spatial plans which, when combined, enable a step-change in housing provision and connectivity.
•The plan should also ensure that options for funding infrastructure are fully integrated into the strategy.
•The Commission will support this process as part of the second phase of the Cambridge-Milton Keynes-Oxford study.

Recommendation 2: The quality of infrastructure design and its impact on maintaining and enhancing the character of the built environment should be central to any strategic plan for the area.
•As part of the next stage of its work, the Commission will continue to work with urban planners and the design community to understand how infrastructure can enable new and expanded settlements which incorporate the highest standards of design and place making.

Recommendation 3: Local authorities, Local Enterprise Partnerships, government departments and national delivery agencies, should work together to develop proposals for the joint governance arrangements required to deliver coordinated planning.
•This work should build on and strengthen existing cross-corridor collaborations and should consider the potential for formal joint governance mechanisms (e.g. joint committees, combined authorities, sub-national transport bodies, or the creation of unitary authorities). These should include consideration of future devolved powers, freedoms and financial flexibilities.
•The work should also consider the full range of delivery mechanisms capable of accelerating housing growth, including looking at the potential for new development corporations to accelerate and drive delivery.
•The Commission will support this process as part of the second phase of the Cambridge-Milton Keynes-Oxford study.

Recommendation 4: The government should commit to delivering the Western Section of the East West Rail project before 2024 (the end of the rail industry’s Control Period 6).
•To achieve this, the government should bring forward £100m in funding to accelerate design and development, and commit construction monies as necessary to:
•avoid abortive cost (subject to the development process demonstrating rigorous disciplines in planning, cost management and value management)
•integrate construction of the East West Rail Western Section with work HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)).
•To fully maximise the benefits of the project local authorities should recognise the potentially transformational benefits of East West Rail and develop and agree, working with national government, an ambitious strategy for housing development and delivery around stations and station towns.
•The Commission will support this process as part of the second phase of the Cambridge-Milton Keynes-Oxford study.

Recommendation 5: The government should commit up to £10m in development funding to continue work on the Central Section of the East West Rail link.
•Government should provide clear guidance that a core objective for the development of this scheme should be to support the provision of new housing and connect it to local and regional labour markets.
•Local partners and national government should work together to develop a plan for the Central Section which links development work on the East West Rail Central Section to options for local housing development. *Government should explore the potential for alternative delivery and financing mechanisms for the railway. This should include consideration of how third party contributions could be leveraged.
•The Commission will support this process as part of the second phase of the Cambridge-Milton Keynes-Oxford study.

Recommendation 6: The government should commit £27m to the end of 2018/19 to fund the next phase of development work on the Oxford-Cambridge Expressway study, allowing the detailed design process to begin as soon as possible.
•Highways England should work with relevant local authorities to develop and assess the potential Expressway options and develop a proposal which maximises the scheme’s potential to unlock housing growth and connect it to local and regional labour markets, alongside delivering wider benefits.
•The Commission will support this process as part of the second phase of the Cambridge-Milton Keynes-Oxford study.

Recommendation 7: In order to maximise the benefits of new strategic infrastructure and to ensure that urban centres across the corridor continue to function effectively - Local Authorities, Local Enterprise Partnerships, government departments and national delivery agencies, should work together in each centre to define a set of credible, coherent and co-owned city centre transport strategies.
•These strategies may build on existing plans, but also ensure that national and regional level schemes are properly integrated into local thinking.
•These strategies should be consistent with partners’ wider work to develop a plan for the corridor that maximises its potential to support housing growth.
•This should include realistic proposals on funding and financing and any consideration of any devolved powers, freedoms or financial flexibilities.
•The Commission will support this process as part of the second phase of the Cambridge-Milton Keynes-Oxford study.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10120


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 17, 2016, 12:09:50 »

I was just about to post a link to that report myself.

A much needed boost to the East-West Rail scheme which seemed to have lost a bit of momentum over the last year or so.  Hopefully that advance of £100m will be forthcoming so that the western section can be completed as soon as possible.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1209


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: November 17, 2016, 13:43:52 »

Off the railway topic but...

The front cover is a bike bridge - the one just north of Cambridge station.

The report is full of talk about "limited ‘last mile’ capacity into certain centres and other employment locations", the need for "immediate, local connections into specific sites and developments", the challenge to "better link homes to employment", "build new communities around transport hubs and interchanges", "create inclusive liveable places, connecting people and communities with opportunities for work and leisure", "mitigate congestion in city centres", and so on.

So the headlines for long-distance travel are EWR and the Oxford-Cambridge expressway. Jolly good. Let's turn to the recommendations for local travel in the corridor. Oxford and Cambridge are two of Britain's five great cycling cities. There's a bike bridge on the cover. London has proved how massive investment in cycling infrastructure can have a transformative effect. Ok, this should be good.

Nope. Nothing on cycling infrastructure at all. "Bus-only corridors", "overground and underground light–rail systems", "new park and ride models using autonomous vehicles". Nothing, at all, on investing in the mode of transport that Denmark and the Netherlands have proved to be a cost-effective, pollution-free, efficient way of moving millions of people between home, transport hub and employment.

I despair sometimes.
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: November 17, 2016, 15:27:54 »

Just out of interest, which are Britain's three other 'great cycling cities'?
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1209


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: November 17, 2016, 15:32:04 »

I'd have said London, York and Bristol. But personal opinion only!
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17895


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: November 19, 2016, 18:04:17 »

Yes, Bristol is one of them.



Allegedly.  Roll Eyes
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: November 20, 2016, 10:53:01 »

Herd on Broadcasting House that Hammond might announce an Cambridge, Milton Keynes, Oxford Express (?) Way. how does that affect east West Rail?
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10120


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: November 20, 2016, 10:57:04 »

It will hopefully compliment it, though detailed studies for it haven't been done yet, so it's many years away from being a reality.  It is mentioned in recommendation 7 of the National Infrastructure Commission's report that ChrisB has quoted in this thread.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Noggin
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 516


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: November 20, 2016, 22:33:29 »

Herd on Broadcasting House that Hammond might announce an Cambridge, Milton Keynes, Oxford Express (?) Way. how does that affect east West Rail?

As per the original post, already in planning e.g. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/oxford-to-cambridge-expressway-strategic-study-interim-report. AFAIK (as far as I know) likely to be a series of upgrades rather than a whole new road.

Don't think that it affects the rail, I think most planners these days would accept that both are needed.

Logged
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1424


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: November 21, 2016, 11:00:15 »

It is almost the reverse of the East-West rail situation as the M1 - Cambridge stretch would be mainly online upgrades, whereas Bicester - M1 would be largely new build, with one of the options paralleling E-W rail corridor to a significant degree. Bicester to Oxford could be either, but it seems new build is maybe the more likely.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40843



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #10 on: November 21, 2016, 11:07:34 »

One of the very serious problems in travelling from Oxford to Cambridge is the serious congestion within both cities and their immediate surrounds.   I work from time to time at various sites in both; neither is huge, and yet when looking for somewhere to stay proximity to workplace is a significant factor that's missing in other smaller cities.

Does the proposed expressway deal with "the last miles" for either city?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12366


View Profile Email
« Reply #11 on: November 21, 2016, 11:08:16 »

Surely widening the A34 is the sensible choice for Bicester-Oxford.?
Logged
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1209


View Profile Email
« Reply #12 on: November 21, 2016, 11:17:24 »

A straightforward widening only gets you as far as Peartree, though. Beyond that, where the traffic is still very bad, you have to look at rebuilding the viaduct (again) and knocking down half of Botley. Given that the aim is to connect not just Oxford City Centre and Cambridge City Centre but also the two hi-tech regions that surround them, and that Oxford's hi-tech region is mostly south of the city (Culham/Harwell etc.), you can see why they're looking at alternatives.

(Personally I'd prefer to see a commitment to reducing the traffic on the A34 back down to manageable levels by providing sustainable alternatives, but hey ho, that seems unlikely with Hoverboard Hammond in the Treasury...)
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12366


View Profile Email
« Reply #13 on: November 21, 2016, 11:22:49 »

Given that the aim is to connect not just Oxford City Centre and Cambridge City Centre but also the two hi-tech regions that surround them, and that Oxford's hi-tech region is mostly south of the city (Culham/Harwell etc.),

Precisely why I said widen the A34.....goes straight there avoiding the city centre.

There is no way the good councillors of Oxford will allow another road into the centre of Oxford.
Logged
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1209


View Profile Email
« Reply #14 on: November 21, 2016, 12:14:07 »

Yes, but again, simply "widening the A34" means you have to knock down half of Botley - which I don't think the good councillors will be too happy about, either - and rebuild the viaduct.

Hence the consideration being given to a newbuild route instead, probably to the south of the city. OCC have been talking about this for a few years, it's nothing particularly new.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page