Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 23:55 28 Apr 2024
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Apr (1963)
Bristol Bus Boycott announced (*)

Train RunningDelayed
23:03 Reading to Gatwick Airport
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 29, 2024, 00:04:19 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[129] Clan Line - by Clan Line !
[111] Visiting the pub on the way home.
[41] South Western Railways Waterloo - Bristol services axed
[39] access for all at Devon stations report
[25] Labour to nationalise railways within five years of coming to ...
[20] Misleading advertising?
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 16
  Print  
Author Topic: Severn Beach Line; trains, performance, tickets and usage  (Read 61251 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40843



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #45 on: July 05, 2017, 16:15:19 »

Are there any scheduled plans to increase the frequency of trains on this line? And improve track to allow this?

A service of every 45minutes seems ridiculous to me, surely 15 minutes at peak and 30 minutes at the rest of the day.

The line has become a scheduler's nightmare as service has built up from the occasional train on a sleepy branch in the 1970s. Single track sections mean that you have to have trains pass each other at specific places, and the mainline interaction means that you've got to dovetail in with other services coming from as far as Penzance, Aberdeen, Brighton and Cardiff.

Of course, if you ran a loop service - in the morning out via Abbey Wood and Hallen and back via Avonmouth and Clifton Down, it would only be signalling that needed upgrades ... reverse direction in the evening, Avonmouth to Severn Beach to become a shuttle.     But there would be plenty of reasons it couldn't happen ...
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
simonw
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 591


View Profile Email
« Reply #46 on: July 05, 2017, 17:19:33 »

Ah, so the Henbury loop would have been a major bonus!

Lets hope the new WoE Mayor can magic up the extra money to turn the spur into a loop!
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #47 on: July 05, 2017, 18:09:17 »

I noticed this afternoon that the 1603 from BRI» (Bristol Temple Meads - next trains) wasn't a turbo. I was under the impression that apart from the first working of the day the branch has completely moved to turbos, so wonder whether I've got that wrong?
Logged
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 9843



View Profile
« Reply #48 on: July 05, 2017, 18:32:19 »

Just for clarity I have moved the posts about problems seeing some pictures on this thread to the existing topic we have on Photobucket - http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=18408.0
Logged
phile
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1382

Language spoken Welsh as well as English


View Profile Email
« Reply #49 on: July 05, 2017, 19:01:40 »

I noticed this afternoon that the 1603 from BRI» (Bristol Temple Meads - next trains) wasn't a turbo. I was under the impression that apart from the first working of the day the branch has completely moved to turbos, so wonder whether I've got that wrong?

It's not you that's wrong.  What's wrong is that there was a Turbo failure
Logged
Kempis
Transport Scholar
Full Member
******
Posts: 73


View Profile
« Reply #50 on: July 05, 2017, 21:35:40 »

Yes -- it was back to the old order on the 18.47 tonight, which was a 150, and 15 minutes late at Clifton Down. On my outward journey, the 8.16 Turbo from Clifton Down departed on time and was about 5 minutes late at Temple Meads -- not unusual for that train.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7800



View Profile
« Reply #51 on: July 05, 2017, 21:41:37 »

I noticed this afternoon that the 1603 from BRI» (Bristol Temple Meads - next trains) wasn't a turbo. I was under the impression that apart from the first working of the day the branch has completely moved to turbos, so wonder whether I've got that wrong?

It's not you that's wrong.  What's wrong is that there was a Turbo failure

You'll get used to it.......we all did (and still do!) on LTV (London [and] Thames Valley)!
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18924



View Profile
« Reply #52 on: July 05, 2017, 22:33:22 »

Chatting with a driver today I was told that the Turbos are being limited to 5mph at Bristol TM(resolve) and Montpelier. They have to be down to that speed before the platform ramp.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7172


View Profile
« Reply #53 on: July 05, 2017, 23:16:36 »

Chatting with a driver today I was told that the Turbos are being limited to 5mph at Bristol TM(resolve) and Montpelier. They have to be down to that speed before the platform ramp.

What, never finished the gauge clearance work, then?
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18924



View Profile
« Reply #54 on: July 05, 2017, 23:28:52 »

This driver said that Turbos were cleared for all platforms at line speed back when they ran Bristol-Oxford services.

There has been no platform work done as far as I know. But maybe track profiles have changed since the Turbos were last in Bristol in 2003.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40843



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #55 on: July 06, 2017, 06:21:11 »

This driver said that Turbos were cleared for all platforms at line speed back when they ran Bristol-Oxford services.

There has been no platform work done as far as I know. But maybe track profiles have changed since the Turbos were last in Bristol in 2003.

If that is the case, it's not the only place where things have changed. We've discussed the Isle of Wight (Ryde Tunnel) situation here, and it was absurd (or premature) to do works at Salisbury that have resulted in the banning of class 153 units from platform 3 there.  We end up day after day with the 11:11 Westbury to Southampton showing as "cancelled" on Journey Check, with a new train at 11:11 running from - err - Westbury to Southampton.    As the 11:11 provides an important connection from the West Country to Southampton, the train's not a quiet one but a 153 will have enough seats for everyone  most days (shock, horror - people may have to sit next to a stranger or have their bag give up its seat!) but a wonder how many are put off by the rather unfortunate way the public are told that the train is CANCELLED when (from a passenger view point) it's just a bit more social with fellow passengers.

In a world of more specialism, we seem to loose the ability to mix and match if things get changed around ...
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
chuffed
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1502


View Profile
« Reply #56 on: July 06, 2017, 07:30:12 »

I see Chris Grayling is at Temple Meads today to ride the Severn Beach Riviera Express. Can anyone on this forum, and on his train, put in a plea for the Portishead line, the Henbury loop, electrification (lack of), and raise any other rail related matters with him. He needs to know our strength of feeling on these issues.
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #57 on: July 06, 2017, 08:47:43 »

Chatting with a driver today I was told that the Turbos are being limited to 5mph at Bristol TM(resolve) and Montpelier. They have to be down to that speed before the platform ramp.

What, never finished the gauge clearance work, then?

That's shockingly poor if that's the case. NR» (Network Rail - home page) has had how many years to plan this work, and indeed there has been a delay in the Turbos arriving because of electrification delays.  By now they should have been operating all over the area. 
Logged
chuffed
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1502


View Profile
« Reply #58 on: July 06, 2017, 13:39:53 »

Just saw and heard Chris Grayling sat on a stationery Turbo at Temple Meads, on Points West, where he said he wants to 'sort out Portishead' and as good as admitted that we have been poorly served as a region in recent years. I hope we get a longer soundbite in the evening bulletin.
Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5219


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #59 on: July 06, 2017, 15:36:16 »

Lets hope the new WoE Mayor can magic up the extra money...

No magic - it's central government having the magnanimity to allow us to spend some of our own locally-raised taxes locally!

Chatting with a driver today I was told that the Turbos are being limited to 5mph at Bristol TM(resolve) and Montpelier. They have to be down to that speed before the platform ramp.

When I got on at Montpelier yesterday I noticed that they'd repainted the edge and the 'Mind the Gap' markings. Shame if they have to come back adjust it! It was quite nice not to have to step over a yawning gap.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 16
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page