Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 15:55 27 Apr 2024
- Boy finds rare Lego toy on beach after two-year search
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

No 'On This Day' events reported for 27th Apr

Train RunningCancelled
15:09 Gloucester to Weymouth
Additional 20:57 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
21:01 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
Short Run
14:10 Gloucester to Frome
27/04/24 14:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
27/04/24 15:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
16:02 Westbury to Gloucester
17:43 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
18:10 Gloucester to Westbury
18:12 Salisbury to Cheltenham Spa
19:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
19:13 Salisbury to Worcester Shrub Hill
Delayed
14:02 Westbury to Gloucester
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 27, 2024, 15:58:43 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[97] Labour to nationalise railways within five years of coming to ...
[50] access for all at Devon stations report
[32] Who we are - the people behind firstgreatwestern.info
[11] Bonaparte's at Bristol Temple Meads
[2] Lack of rolling stock due to attacks on shipping in the Red Se...
[1] Cornish delays
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
Author Topic: Well would you believe it PART 2  (Read 18876 times)
Shazz
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 534


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: February 25, 2008, 17:49:29 »


Oh, and it was Blaenau Gwent council who proposed, and funded a large part of the ebbw vale service. Vote for someone better next time you have your local council elections Wink

I don't really think that is a fair thing to say considering the state of the Labour Gmt.

You might not, but if it wasnt for them, this whole thing might never have happened.

So its a perfectly valid point.

Oh, and you have what, 52 (?) "new" unites en route in the near future. Whereas, Wales is to get none.

So i think its fair game that you don't get atws stock, and sit and wait for just another year or so.
« Last Edit: February 25, 2008, 17:51:18 by Shazz » Logged
r james
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 223


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: February 25, 2008, 17:50:00 »

AH i never realised that it was because FGW (First Great Western) forgot to renew their 150s that they lost them!!!!!  I thought it was the DFT (Department for Transport) who simply re-alocated them.

I still do not think that 150s are the answer to FGWs stock problem - its 158s and similar that they need.  Infact they need NEW trains, which I think its time the first group considered funding towards??  
Logged
dog box
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 653


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: February 25, 2008, 17:52:50 »

The bottom line shazz is most people who read this site couldnt give two hoots if people are riding on the roof on the valley lines. only that FGW (First Great Western) increase the capacity on the Cardiff /Portsmouth by getting hold of additional stock
Logged

All postings reflect my own personal views and opinions and are not intended to be, nor should be taken as official statements of first great western or first group policy
Shazz
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 534


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: February 25, 2008, 17:54:35 »

AH i never realised that it was because FGW (First Great Western) forgot to renew their 150s that they lost them!!!!!  I thought it was the DFT (Department for Transport) who simply re-alocated them.

I still do not think that 150s are the answer to FGWs stock problem - its 158s and similar that they need.  Infact they need NEW trains, which I think its time the first group considered funding towards?? 

Oh its not like first group have money luying around*








*its not like they're making near a ^229.7m a year in profits, honest



The bottom line shazz is most people who read this site couldnt give two hoots if people are riding on the roof on the valley lines. only that FGW increase the capacity on the Cardiff /Portsmouth by getting hold of additional stock

I know, i'm just pointing out the pit falls/ many many reasons they're more than likely not to get stock from across the severn, especially as i believe it was the daft/nrs idea to extend the platforms and send extra stock atws way
« Last Edit: February 25, 2008, 17:57:48 by Shazz » Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: February 25, 2008, 17:56:31 »

The DafT specified how many units the franchise needed in their greatest hour of wisdom and therefore it was not necessary for FGW (First Great Western) to renew the lease on 8 150s...

I'd say as nice as more 158s would be, we aren't going to get any wheras we were going to get some 150s but apparantly not until 2010 so we will continue to suffer.  Roll Eyes

Why should FGW buy new trains anyway when they will loose the franchise in a few years time anyway. If the DafT really cared they wouldn't simply throw around stupid insult at FGW when THEY ARE the problem, instead they would tackle the route problem and build some bloody trains and not stand around chatting about it all bloody year  Undecided Undecided Undecided
Logged
Shazz
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 534


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: February 25, 2008, 17:59:55 »

The DafT specified how many units the franchise needed in their greatest hour of wisdom and therefore it was not necessary for FGW (First Great Western) to renew the lease on 8 150s...

I'd say as nice as more 158s would be, we aren't going to get any wheras we were going to get some 150s but apparantly not until 2010 so we will continue to suffer.  Roll Eyes

Why should FGW buy new trains anyway when they will loose the franchise in a few years time anyway. If the DafT really cared they wouldn't simply throw around stupid insult at FGW when THEY ARE the problem, instead they would tackle the route problem and build some bloody trains and not stand around chatting about it all bloody year  Undecided Undecided Undecided

Other TOCs (Train Operating Company) have, and do...

It's not like first have 3 franchises that could use new stock if they decided to become a rosco as well, and buy there own stock. And could even lease them to whoever gets the franchise come the end of the current one. And i'm sure the competition comission would welcome another rosco to sort out the stupidly high prices some trains cost to lease.
« Last Edit: February 25, 2008, 18:01:28 by Shazz » Logged
r james
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 223


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: February 25, 2008, 18:01:23 »

Its no different to how FGW (First Great Western) own some of their HST (High Speed Train) powercars. 

ANyway, who has said nothing wll be going to FGW until 2010 in terms of 150s???  I haven;t read this anywhere??  Can you confirm this? 
Logged
Shazz
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 534


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: February 25, 2008, 18:05:47 »

Its no different to how FGW (First Great Western) own some of their HST (High Speed Train) powercars. 

ANyway, who has said nothing wll be going to FGW until 2010 in terms of 150s???  I haven;t read this anywhere??  Can you confirm this? 

Thats when the remainder ( 8 ) of the 150's from EMT» (East Midlands Trains - about) will arrive at the very latest

Before, the rest cascade fgw's way sometime later
Logged
r james
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 223


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: February 25, 2008, 18:07:17 »

Do you mean London Midland?Huh  I didnt think EMT» (East Midlands Trains - about) has 150s?


Logged
Shazz
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 534


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: February 25, 2008, 18:08:44 »

Do you mean London Midland?Huh  I didnt think EMT» (East Midlands Trains - about) has 150s?





...yes i did!
Logged
r james
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 223


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: February 25, 2008, 18:09:54 »

When you say the rest transfer, what do you mean???  I didn't realise that FGW (First Great Western) wee to get every single other 150.  I would presume some would go to Northern and ATW (Arriva Trains Wales (former TOC (Train Operating Company))) also?
Logged
Shazz
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 534


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: February 25, 2008, 18:14:06 »

When you say the rest transfer, what do you mean???  I didn't realise that FGW (First Great Western) wee to get every single other 150.  I would presume some would go to Northern and ATW (Arriva Trains Wales (former TOC (Train Operating Company))) also?

midland are replacing all of there 150's with turbo stars.

As far as i'm aware they are to be allocated to fgw as part of the "1000 extra carriages" thing
« Last Edit: February 25, 2008, 18:16:20 by Shazz » Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6299


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: February 25, 2008, 18:33:38 »

This is why FGW (First Great Western) need these extra 150s:

http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=1847.0

Something that happens every weekend on the Cardiff-Portsmouth line
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #28 on: February 25, 2008, 19:06:01 »

What about the Adelantes, are they coming as well?
Logged
DanielP
Full Member
***
Posts: 35


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: February 25, 2008, 20:49:26 »

I wouldn't go getting too jealous of the Ebbw Vale area- it has pretty close to zero employment prospects and bad road links, so railway access is literally a godsend. Now people with pretty much no opportunities can get out to find better jobs etc. As for the Valley lines, did I mention that the reason that six car trains will be run is that there has been a massive station extension project including 42 stations- this isn't just using existing platforms, it is major construction and investment the like of which isn't happening in England at the moment. That is why the extra units are needed.

I can understand why folks are getting upset, but as a Welsh rail user, I mustn't forget the FGW (First Great Western) situation, but also FGW campaigners should be looking at what is happening in our area and taking notes about what CAN be made to happen. Luckily, the Welsh Assembly (up to a point) put their money where their mouth is. Having said that, our system is being done cheaply- they should really have done a Chiltern style total route modernisation (Turbostars and all!), but they couldn't come up with the money. Of course, Cardiff is a capital city, which helps, but WAG» (Welsh Assembly Government - about) have also been carrying out improvements on the Cambrian line (more passing loops) etc.

I bet there is a hell of a lot of bargaining and politics going on behind this rolling stock and I bet Mr Haines is earning his ^ in the process too. I think by the end of it, if FGW don't get extra stock immediately, it will be clear to EVERYONE (not just those in the know) that the issues are totally the DaFT» (Department for Transport - critical sounding abbreviation I discourage - about)'s fault.

Not much consolation if you are left stranded on a platform, but i (and many others) have been there too in Wales!!

Daniel

Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page