Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 23:15 28 Apr 2024
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 22/05/24 - WWRUG / TransWilts update
02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Apr (1996)
GNER franchise (Sea Containers) starts on ECML (*)

Train RunningDelayed
19:38 London Paddington to Swansea
19:53 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:44 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
21:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
22:10 Taunton to Bristol Temple Meads
23:03 Reading to Gatwick Airport
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 28, 2024, 23:16:51 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[138] Clan Line - by Clan Line !
[118] Visiting the pub on the way home.
[44] South Western Railways Waterloo - Bristol services axed
[42] access for all at Devon stations report
[27] Labour to nationalise railways within five years of coming to ...
[22] Misleading advertising?
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Network Rail Cotswold Line Double-Tracking Announcement Delayed?  (Read 13740 times)
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« on: March 13, 2008, 13:07:56 »

From the Save The Train Forum :

The expected Network Rail announcement during February has now slipped to mid-March with silence prevailing still... Angry
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 14, 2008, 18:43:27 »

I know just what is going to happen!!

Absolutely bugger all!

Oh it makes me so angry!

Besides, we all know that the best we'll get is Norton to Evesham anyway.

I mean, can't FGW (First Great Western)/NR» (Network Rail - home page) see that the full redoubling is absolutely essential. It is- think of the delays caused at the Reading bottleneck due to late running services!

Come on, this is not good enough!

 Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry Angry
Logged
IanL
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 348


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: April 02, 2008, 15:35:01 »

Now April and not a squeak from Network rail or FGW (First Great Western). I am sure the subject will be raised at the meeting with FGW on friday.
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: April 02, 2008, 17:00:24 »

Now April and not a squeak from Network rail or FGW (First Great Western). I am sure the subject will be raised at the meeting with FGW on friday.

If anyone on this forum is going, please raise it!
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: April 04, 2008, 13:31:12 »

The very latest...

http://oxfordmail.co.uk/display.var.2172240.0.rail_improvements_on_track.php
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: April 04, 2008, 14:28:07 »


Quote from: willc article
Moves to improve the Cotswold Line rail route between Oxford and Worcester took a step forward today, when Network Rail indicated its preferred option for the project.

"This would see double track reinstated for four miles from Finstock, near Charlbury, to Ascott-under-Wychwood, and on the 16-mile section from Moreton-in-Marsh, in Gloucestershire, to Evesham, in Worcestershire.

Isnt there a meeting in Charlbury tonight? What excellent timing  Grin
http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=1975.msg14682#msg14682

Are new/restored platforms at Finstock, Charlbury, Ascott-under-Wychwood and Honeybourne included in the preferred option?
« Last Edit: April 04, 2008, 16:13:58 by Lee Fletcher » Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: April 04, 2008, 16:18:16 »

From the Save The Train Forum :

Timing that's almost too co-incendental, Lee!  Wink

Good news as a first step towards modernising this main line, though I will be interested to hear more detail when they are released as to the connected infrastructure/signalling works that will be included - including the station situation.

I would imagine the section of double track will commence after Finstock station as there's no chance the linespeed could not be affected on the curve through the station with two tracks/platforms otherwise. Platforms situations at Charlbury, Ascott and Honeybourne need clarifying though - though anybody who's been to Honeybourne will recognise that the old platform is in marvelous shape still and will need little more that a bit of packing and a layer of tarmac to almost accommodate a full-length HST (High Speed Train) (plus a footbridge of course)!

Over to the Government, err, sorry, the ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about), to give it the green light.

Further article quote :

Quote from: willc article
After a ^150,000 year-long feasibility study, Network Rail has included the project in its updated Strategic Business Plan, which was submitted to the Office of Rail Regulation today.

Although the redoubling scheme is not among the improvement projects the Government has indicated it is prepared to fund from 2009-14, the rail infrastructure firm is understood to believe it has a strong business case for the plan and can show it has wider benefits for the route between London, Reading, Didcot and Oxford.

The ORR is expected to give its verdict in June.

The Network Rail Strategic Business Plan Update can be found in the link below.
http://www.networkrail.co.uk/aspx/4357.aspx
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: April 04, 2008, 18:00:10 »

Hooray!  Grin Grin Grin

This is an excellent start! This must go ahead. Cool

Unfortunately, I too am pessimistic about how much signalling/ new platforms will be done! Angry

But anything is good. Wink

Let's hope that petition, although perhaps rather redundant, will just encourage Darling to release the funds - there are 315 signatures now (well over the 200 needed for Gordon to look at it)!
« Last Edit: April 04, 2008, 19:25:35 by Btline » Logged
IanL
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 348


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: April 04, 2008, 20:24:27 »

Just back from meeting, NR» (Network Rail - home page) route manager and FGW (First Great Western) route manager there. NR manager claimed that the solution they are proposing will deliver 95% of the benefits at 33% of the cost of a full redoubling mainly due to not having to get into the Oxford signalling or tunnels at the Hereford end.

If ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) give go ahaed for funding (june decision) then first sod cut in Jan09, finished May 2010.

Platforms and footbridges included in funding plan.

Lots more said at meeting, will try and note it down in another  thread but thought that this might be relavent to this thread.

Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: April 04, 2008, 20:31:37 »

Platforms and footbridges included in funding plan.

Does that means all possibly affected stations- i.e Finstock, Charlbury, Ascott-under-Wychwood and Honeybourne?
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: April 04, 2008, 20:33:26 »

So this would leave single track sections of 9 miles at either end with a central double track section of around 30 miles. That would certainly appear to have a lot more operational flexibility than currently, and I guess the timetable would be planned that the services crossed somewhere in the middle of the double section, affording for plenty of margin for error if one service is running late.  
Logged
IanL
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 348


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: April 04, 2008, 22:00:05 »

Lee,

Finstock would still be on the single line, the doubling would stop about 0.5mile to the Oxford side of Charlbury. NR» (Network Rail - home page) manager didnt name stations but stated four footbridges.

Made the claim that this would allow at least hourly service.

Some improvements to freight lines and Bicester line to allow passenger trains to wait without blocking main line will assist in reducing problems due to remaining Wolvercote-finstock bit of single line.

The big cost for complete redoubling would be the Oxford signalling, this is not due for replacement yet, if this needs altering then the whole lot gets done which is a huge cost which would prevent it going in th strategic plan.

If and when the Oxford station environs get resignalled than a possibility not excluded by the current plan is a phase 2 to redouble the remaining work at a later stage.
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #12 on: April 04, 2008, 22:09:38 »

Thanks, IanL.
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: April 04, 2008, 23:35:26 »

Excellent news! Smiley

Shame it will take so long...  Cry
Logged
willc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2330


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: April 05, 2008, 00:42:13 »

Station work-wise there would have to be new platforms at Charlbury and Ascott-under-Wychwood, but at Honeybourne, the old island platform (Stratford-upon-Avon and Cheltenham services used the opposite face) is pretty much intact and could be brought back into use relatively easily. The question here is whether the whole length would be restored to use, as it could probably take a 2+8 HST (High Speed Train), in contrast to the three-coach platform on the single line.

Not clear on footbridge locations (though CBY and HYB are obvious), but if they are going to spend the money, then Kingham really could do with a new disabled/cycle/baby buggy-accessible bridge while they are at it, because if you can't manage steps, then you can't reach the Oxford/London-bound platform at present.

After questions about parking at Charlbury station - and people leaving cars in the town and walking down to the station - Dave Ward, Network Rail's western route director, said at the meeting tonight that he would be taking up the issue of providing adequate car parking at all the stations on the route with the team in charge of the project, as station facilities are very much part of the equation.

More parking could be tricky, as previously noted, at Shipton. And new housing at Honeybourne has eaten up what would have been an ideal area to extend into, though there is a lot of railway-owned land on the opposite side, behind the island platform, with disused sidings on, so maybe there is parking potential there.

However, if the shortlisted eco-town at Long Marston were to go ahead (and it would only make eco-sense if the rail link through to Stratford upon Avon is reinstated - and maybe even to Cheltenham via the Gloucester & Warwickshire preserved line - then they may need to reinvent Honeybourne Junction in all its four-platform glory, along with the spectacular triangular and burrowing junctions just to the east (the GWR (Great Western Railway) didn't do things by halves in the 1900s). How about a Birmingham-Worcester-Evesham-Honeybourne-Long Marston-Stratford-Birmingham circular route and Stratford-Oxford via the Cotswold Line?

And let's not forget Chipping Campden, where Gloucestershire County Council has long had aspirations to reopen the station. Until now, lack of capacity on the single line has always stymied this, but a green light for double track would change the equation here.

Certainly interesting times in these parts.

Quote
Shame it will take so long...

Give them a break - in rail project terms, this is warp speed. They are talking 15 months of work, while keeping trains running for as much of that time as possible. All told it would be just over three years from starting study work to completion, which compares pretty well with Chiltern's redoubling schemes.

Now all we've got to do is hope that D(a)fT and the ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) see sense.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page